Tag Archives: Telecom/Technology

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

Weekly changes in short positions for the period from June 19 saw increases of more than one percentage point easily outnumber decreases to the tune of seven to two.

The largest increase was in David Jones ((DJS)), where positions rose to 10.38% from 8.36% previously. The increase came prior to the rumoured takeover proposal for the company and followed what had been disappointing 3Q sales for the retailer.

David Jones was not the only retailer for which shorts increased in the week from June 19, as positions in The Reject Shop ((TRS)) also rose to 8.18% from 6.39% previously. The changes don't appear to have been driven by any announcements from the company but reflect changes to in substantial shareholdings during the period.

Myer ((MYR)) was another retailer for which short positions increased during the period, rising to 11.67 from 10.24% the week before. Again there were few announcements from the company other than news of a new store in Darwin, while there were a few announced changes in major shareholdings.

Myer, David Jones and The Reject Shop remain among the top 20 short positions on the Australian market, along with other retailer-based plays including Billabong ((BBG)), Harvey Norman ((HVN)), Flight Centre ((FLT)) and Carsales.com ((CRZ)).

Others in the top 20 largest short positions list include Paladin ((PDN)) and Iluka ((ILU)) among the resource plays, Cochlear ((COH)) and Mesoblast ((MSB)) among healthcare and biotech companies and Echo Entertainment ((EGP)) and Fairfax ((FXJ)) among the industrial plays.

JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)) continues to be the company with the largest short position on the Australian market but as RBS Australia notes, total shorts in the stock have fallen over the past two weeks by 2.6 percentage points to 21.7%.

According to RBS the negative momentum in the TV category has eased somewhat in recent months, which gives increased confidence JB Hi-Fi can meet full year earnings guidance. Given a currently attractive earnings multiple, JB Hi-Fi is RBS's preferred exposure in the discretionary retail sector.

Senex Energy ((SXY)) also saw short positions jump to 2.11% from less than 0.5% previously, this despite the company spudding the Shocking 1 well that subsequently delivered oil shows worth testing further.

Shorts in Murchison Metals ((MMX)) increased to 2.19% from 0.95% for the week, this prior to the company announcing its intention to seek approval for a capital return to shareholders.

An increase in shorts in Cabcharge ((CAB)) to 2.01% from 0.51% previously follows news the Reserve Bank of Australia is assessing surcharge fees applied to credit card transactions. While management has indicated there is unlikely to be a direct impact on Cabcharge it adds to uncertainty in the view of Macquarie.

The largest fall in short positions was in the IShares S&P/ASX High Dividend derivative, where total positions declined to 1.33% from 3.44% in the week from June 19. In terms of specific stocks the largest fall was in Echo Entertainment ((EGP)), where positions moved to 6.09% from 7.49% prior to the group re-negotiating some debt terms but after a capital raising had been factored in by the market.

With respect to monthly changes the major increases have been in Fairfax and The Reject Shop, while Seven West ((SWM)) shorts also rose by more than two percentage points, which came prior to the company reiterating earnings guidance for this year but indicating there remains pressure on FY13 earnings.

SingTel ((SGT)) and Linc Energy ((LNC)) also experienced increases in shorts for the month from May 25, both seeing increases of more than two percentage points despite little in the way of announcements to impact on investor views on the stocks.

Bradken ((BKN)) enjoyed the largest fall in shorts for the month, positions declining to 1.33% from 3.5%, this following a report by Macquarie indicating perceived balance sheet stress for the group was a non-issue given a currently robust sales environment.

Despite a disappointing profit result late last month shorts in Elders ((ELD)) have fallen in the month from May 25 to 3.61% from 5.62%. The result suggested debt remains too high and consensus market forecasts appear too optimistic, but at the same time showed management is making some progress in turning around the business.

 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 21457044 98850643 21.71
2 FXJ 343794850 2351955725 14.62
3 FLT 12354227 100039833 12.35
4 CRZ 28615710 233689223 12.25
5 MYR 68102760 583384551 11.67
6 COH 6309219 56929432 11.08
7 LYC 178962250 1714846913 10.44
8 DJS 54856855 528655600 10.38
9 BBG 25419588 257888239 9.86
10 HVN 101809015 1062316784 9.58
11 ILU 39372102 418700517 9.40
12 PDN 78185555 835645290 9.36
13 GNS 75429556 848401559 8.89
14 TRS 2132461 26071170 8.18
15 LNC 38953547 504487631 7.72
16 CSR 38107642 506000315 7.53
17 ISO 419055 5703165 7.35
18 WTF 15206681 211736244 7.18
19 MSB 18189889 284478361 6.39
20 EGP 41894654 688019737 6.09

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

UXC Offering Attractive IT Exposure, With Yield

 - Moelis rates UXC as a Buy
 - Company well placed to compete with multinationals in IT sector
 - New contracts to boost earnings
 - Stock attractively valued at current levels

By Chris Shaw

The IT services environment has been challenging for some time, wiith companies in the sector struggling as customers have postponed or decided to cancel IT spending. 

UXC ((UXC)) operates in this sector, offering business solutions and applications and IT consulting services to medium to large entities in both the private and public sectors. With a market capitalisation of around $175 million, UXC receives little coverage in the market. There is no coverage from the eight brokers in the FNArena database.

One broker to cover the stock is Moelis, which rates UXC as a Buy with a price target of $0.65. UXC is currently the only Australian IT play carrying a Buy rating from Moelis, with the stockbroker viewing the company as a viable alternative to multinationals in terms of winning larger size contracts given the scale and breadth of the services offered by UXC.

Recent evidence supports this, as this month UXC has announced a number of new and significant key strategic contracts with Transport for NSW, Hills Industries ((HIL)), GrainCorp ((GNC)) and Toyota. Moelis estimates these contracts are valued at $34 million over the delivery period, most of which are within two years. Further contract wins are possible given results of a number of other major tenders are yet to be announced.

A meeting with management confirmed to Moelis current earnings guidance of an EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) result well ahead of the $15.3 million delivered in the previous corresponding period as realistic. Consensus EBITDA forecasts for the full year project a result of better than $30 million. This implies earnings per share (EPS) growth of 8-10% reports Moelis.

Further growth in earnings remains possible as Moelis notes all divisions in UXC are current operating below optimal utilisation rates. This is evident from profit before tax margins, which for consulting stand at 6.4% against a stated medium-term target of 12%, while applications are delivering 9% against a target of 11%.

Cost cutting should also support earnings growth, Moelis noting some cost out measures such as staff cuts have now been fully implemented and should deliver around $10 million in gross cost savings for UXC.

This expected earnings growth is reflected in the forecasts of Moelis given the expectation for EPS of 5.4c this year, rising to 6.4c in FY13 and 7.6c in FY14. This forecast translates to a FY13 earnings multiple of less than nine times.

For Moelis, such a multiple is undemanding given UXC is well positioned to delivered sustained earnings growth in coming years. This supports the Buy rating, notwithstanding the fact UXC shares have risen by 40% year to date this year.

Adding to the investment equation is an attractive yield. On Moelis's dividend expectations of 2.8c this year, 3.3c in FY13 and 4c in FY14, UXC should yield 5% in 2012, 6% in FY13 and more than 7% in FY14. Dividends are expected to be fully franked. 

Shares in UXC closed yesterday at $0.555, which compares to a range over the past year of $0.385 to $0.70. 

 
Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Deep Fibre, Clouds And Airspace

By Greg Peel

Mircowave specialist BigAir ((BGL)) has presented at Microequities' annual “Microcap Rising Stars” conference a few times now. Back in 2010 the company was trying to shake off the legacy of the retail wireless internet business it had snapped up for a song before soon releasing why the business had never been a success. Wireless internet had been introduced to homes when the concept was too immature, and then Telstra's 3G came along and blew the business out of the water. By 2011, BigAir was beginning to see the benefits of having abandoned retail while further developing the wholesale attributes of its microwave network. It was all falling into place.

BigAir no longer competes with Telstra, but neither does it lease access from Telstra or is it in anyway beholden to either Telstra or the NBN. BigAir provides its own standalone high speed fixed wireless ethernet at a business level. A company operating in Sydney's CBD, for example, can access high speed broadband via a microwave receiver on the rooftop facing a central transmitter located on another rooftop. Ethernet cabling delivers the signal from the receiver to each work station. BigAir owns and installs the infrastructure. The microwave spectrum in question is not the same as that of a smart phone internet access, which is not exactly high speed. BigAir's internet access is comparable to fibre cable.

This would seem to make the NBN a competitor, at least by the time fibre cable reaches everywhere it is expected to reach. This is not, however, the case. BigAir's wireless internet can fill the gap while a company awaits connection to fibre, but most of BigAir's clients use, or will use once fibre is connected, both. Just as buildings have a back-up generator in case the power goes down, or investment banks build whole back-up trading rooms in remote locations for use in the case of disaster, BigAir can provide a back-up high speed internet connection to supplement a land-based fibre connection which may for whatever reason be interrupted. The cost of interruption for most companies far outweighs the cost of the back-up.

BigAir also provides microwave connections as the easiest solution for more temporary structures, such as site offices on construction sites and press rooms at major sporting carnivals. But fixed corporate connections are the bread and butter, and alternative connections are becoming increasingly important as the corporate world moves into the cloud.

It was recently sent a newspaper article from Ireland, which reported on a speech made by a councillor in a particular Irish county which, like the rest of Ireland, has been suffering economically. The county should look to attract investment locally, he suggested, in two growing areas of technology – wind farms and cloud computing. For as we all know, he said (and this is not an apocryphal story), this county is always windy and nearly always cloudy as well.

Cloud computing is the new Big Thing although it's been around for some time, with Google's Gmail a prime example and offerings from the likes of iTunes also introducing the retail consumer to the concept. Quite simply, at a corporate level, cloud computing means keeping all files and file servers at a remote data management centre which becomes sort of one big offsite computer which can be accessed by anyone in the company through any means (computer, smart phone etc). Clouds save the cost of buying ever bigger servers and establishing complex intranet systems and overcomes the issue of having to transfer data to be available for access from one's phone etc.

Clouds are just another form of outsourcing. What clouds do imply, nevertheless, is a far greater frequency of internet access. Rather than installing expensive on-site systems which can be accessed by all employees in the building via the in-house intranet, a company uses an off-site cloud service with employees all accessing via the internet. When a company “goes cloud”, it will need to be damned sure of the integrity of its internet access. Were that land-based fibre, all one needs is for a guy in a fluoro vest to stuff up down a manhole and any number of companies can be offline for any number of hours.

Which is why the demand for BigAir's standalone wireless internet connections is growing – not as an alternative but as a parallel.

This growing demand ensures BigAir's microwave towers are fully employed during the day, even if they aren't actually being used. The typical working day means the towers aren't really earning anything much at night. At least that would be the case if not for BigAir's most recent push, into “community broadband”.

Once upon a time university share houses provided formative experiences for young students at an affordable rent. Today in Australia's major cities and university towns, cash-strapped students have been priced right out of the rental market. Even if three or four can afford the rent together, no landlord will pick a bunch of students out of the stack of applications. For this reason, and to accommodate the growth of the foreign student market, universities have themselves begun to invest heavily in low-cost student residences outside of existing university colleges.

For BigAir, the student share house of today – an apartment block of small rooms and shared facilities – is proving a major growth area for its high-speed wireless connections. Students can't afford to wait for fibre to arrive and even if it has, a disconnection episode could be equally as devastating. The economies of scale of BigAir's growing army of microwave towers means the company can deliver cheap high speed internet while not beholden to some government mandated national pricing scheme. This is perfect for the poor student who can enjoy internet access in residence on a prepaid arrangement.

The best thing about students is they tend to attend uni during the day, and then put in long hours on their assignments at night. While BigAir's transmitters were once idle once the sun set, now they are are buzzing 24/7. BigAir does not need to build more transmitters to exploit community broadband so it's all added margin.

And it doesn't have to stop at students. Retirement villages are increasingly calling out for internet access. Demountable mining villages which will never see fibre are an obvious customer. Construction camps for the country's resource sector and infrastructure mega-projects are another candidate.

BigAir is now the leading provider of internet access to the student accommodation market, acting as exclusive operator at some 120 locations representing some 27,000 students. Meanwhile BigAir's towers are now found in nine major Australian city and regional centres and the footprint is growing all the time. For each tower, additional customers provide increasing margin.

A month ago BigAir acquired Queensland competitor Allegro, which boasts dominant wireless coverage in South East Queensland and more recently in Mackay and Gladstone – the latter the home to the bulk of the state's coal seam gas and coal transportation industries. BigAir has the opportunity to significantly increase the margin on Allegro's existing infrastructure.

In FY11 BigAir reported $5.4m in EBITDA. In the first half of FY12 that figure reached $4.55m, and current FY12 guidance is for $9m. In a tough macro environment, BigAir's share price has risen from 24c last August to 37c today to a market cap of $57.5m.

Industry surveys in the US suggest that by 2015, 50% of all companies expects to operate the majority of their IT applications and infrastructure via the cloud. As the world becomes cloudier, reliable high speed internet access becomes ever more critical.

The cloud is just one aspect of a greater convergence underway between the once separate concepts of IT and telecommunications. Communications systems are being linked to IT frameworks, voice-over-internet is a clear convergence, and IT managed services rely more and more on communications networks. Data centres are growing rapidly and require unfettered access through varying means. For many in Australian business, the government's NBN is not a solution. While substantially faster than copper, the NBN fibre network, when it does eventually reach everywhere, will be fabulous for many applications but not as fast as other private sector solutions can provide.

Amcom ((AMM)) is an Australian company with a $260m market cap which owns and operates its own fast broadband fibre networks servicing the converging telco and IT markets. Amcom has connected Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth and Darwin through a combination of owned and third party networks. The company provides internet access, data networks, data centres, hosted voice and video over internet, IT integration, cloud services and general managed services of all of the above.

While clouds offer the outsourcing of data storage and access, the convergence of telco and IT is also leading to greater outsourcing of company IT requirements to outsourced IT solutions providers and managers. If you outsource the system you might as well outsource the service as well.

To exploit the trend towards IT-as-a-service, Amcom recently acquired L7, which boasts 130 IT professionals servicing 200 corporate and government customers. The acquisition brings to 900 the number of Amcom corporate and government clients. Amcom operates on a split of direct sales teams (servicing 78% of clients), wholesaling to other telcos (12%), and reselling Amcom products through business partners under a “white label” system (11%). Resellers currently number 160.

Of Amcom's 78% direct clients, 52% represent corporates and 26% government. A high proportion of government clients ensures greater client retention and Amcom's general recurring billing relationships ensure largely annuity-style revenues. The first half FY12 saw strong sales growth across all product lines, with fibre sales up 45% on the first half FY11. Product offerings have been broadened, allowing for cross-selling, and the L7 acquisition has accelerated Amcom's cloud penetration. Amcom has continued to invest in FY12 for the next “step change” in FY13.

On a three year compound annual growth rate basis (CAGR), Amcom's revenues have grown by 31%, profit by 33%, earnings per share by 23% and dividends per share by 26%. Amcom shares have risen from 80c in September to around $1.10 today.

Now, there's fibre and there's “deep fibre”. The best way to explain the difference is to think of the size of the water pipe feeding your shower (fibre) to the size of the mains water pipe running down your street (deep fibre). Vocus Telecom ((VOC)) is experiencing a strong uptrend in demand for its deep fibre connections. One deep fibre cable contains 312 fibre strands or 156 connection pairs (upload/download). It's speed makes NBN fibre look like dial-up. And there is even 624 strand cable available.

Whereas BigAir's fast microwave connections can either substitute for or, in more cases back up, ground-laid fibre, Vocus' deep fibre still has to be laid in underground conduits to connect CBD addresses. It costs Vocus an average of $70,000 to connect one client, and that client's internet spend will only cover that cost. But one client means access to only one of 156 fibre pairs. For Vocus, the connection of the other 155 pairs in an already laid cable means free money.

Deep fibre and related ethernet networks are the fastest growing segment of the Vocus business. (In case you're wondering, the “internet” is your world wide web of global information sharing while an “ethernet” is the network of cables which connects your computer to the internet via modems, routers and other network devices.) Vocus owns and operates deep fibre networks in the CBD and metro areas of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, provides carrier ethernet networks and managed ethernet services, and provides ethernet connection between Sydney, New Zealand, Singapore and the US.

When Vocus kicked off in FY08, its business was all internet. Vocus continues to operate Australia's largest wholesale internet protocol backbone (including voice applications) after Telstra and Optus with 21 points of presence (POP) in Australia, five in New Zealand, four in the US and one in Singapore. The company provides internet access to ISPs and telcos in all those international centres and, more recently, is now growing a direct internet offering to the corporate sector.

Through acquisition, Vocus also owns data centres in Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Auckland and Christchurch. The company leases data centre units or private suites and sells bundled connectivity and data centre sevices. And what does this all mean? Clouds.

In the March quarter of FY10, Vocus' sales were all internet based. One year on, its data centre business was providing 22% of sales and fibre/ethernet 18%. In the last March quarter, internet had fallen to 31% and data centres to 18%, leaving 51% fibre/ethernet. In FY11, 4% of sales were to corporates and 96% wholesale. In FY12 that balance should come out at 18% corporate and 82% wholesale.

The lesson here is that while the wholesale business is bread and butter, direct corporate access to deep fibre and ethernet services is only just starting out on the demand curve. And cloud computing is clearly in its infancy as well.

Vocus expects FY12 revenue growth to be 45% over FY11, and earnings (EBITDA) to be 63%. The figures are indicative of the scalability of Vocus' margins on its infrastructure spend. From FY10 to FY11, revenues were split as 54% for internet, 29% for voice, 9% for data centres and fibre/ethernet was only beginning. From FY11 to FY12 (estimated), internet will represent 45%, voice 21%, data centres 18% and fibre/ethernet 14%. Fibre/ethernet revenues are expected to have grown by 186% over the past year.

Vocus will continue to focus on growth in its now more traditional offerings of internet and voice, and is also on the hunt for acquisitions. Meanwhile, the company's enviable revenue and earnings growth is being fuelled by the expanded suite of offerings allowing customer access to a range of complementary products. In the March quarter FY10 Vocus' customer numbered 103. Last March quarter they numbered 363.

At the beginning of FY12 Vocus Telecom shares were trading around $1.30. Today they are at $1.94.

BigAir, Amcom and Vocus were all presenters at the recently held “Microcap Rising Stars” conference sponsored by analyst and fund manager Microequities. Microequities selects the “rising stars” through its own analysis and invites them to present. While there is some overlap, the three companies largely form different segments of what is rapidly becoming the Brave New World of communications-based IT connection and service – that which will dominate the progressing twenty-first century. The government's NBN, which will take years to complete, will drag Australia out of the twentieth century. The NBN will provide fast broadband to (almost) every household but the average investor should not be mistaken in thinking the corporate world has also been waiting for this development. Fibre and microwave networks have been built for and adopted by the corporate world for some time now and the new generation of IT is still in its early stages. 

Soon we will all have our heads in the clouds. 
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

Weekly changes in short positions for the week from May 28 were dominated by increases, with seven stocks seeing positions rise by more than one percentage point against just two declines of a similar magnitude.

The largest change in positions was in Mesoblast ((MSB)), where shorts jumped to 6.17% from 2.86% in the week prior to the company updating on its corporate strategy with respect to product development. Work continues on developing Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) for treating diseases such as Parkinson's and Huntington's disease, but competition in the stem cell sector appears to be increasing.

Shorts in Paladin ((PDN)) rose to 9.03% from 7.43% for the week as the company updated on production and costs for the March quarter. Brokers expect cash flows will be the main point of focus for the market in coming months given upcoming refinancing commitments.

SingTel ((SGT)) experienced an increase in shorts to 4.28% from 2.71% as the market continues to see little in the way of positive drivers for earnings in coming months, especially given the operating environment for telcos in India continues to deteriorate.

For Myer ((MYR)) shorts jumped to 12.62% from 11.24% post an investor day update from the company that left brokers with the view driving sales growth would remain the retailer's biggest challenge in the shorter-term.

The increase has reinforced Myer's place among the top 20 short positions on the Australian market, a list which continues to be dominated by consumer discretionary stocks such as JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), David Jones ((DLS)), Harvey Norman ((HVN)), Billabong ((BBG)) and Wotif.com ((WTF)). Paladin also makes the list along with Lynas ((LYC)) and Iluka ((ILU)) among resource plays and industrials such as CSR ((CSR)) and Echo Entertainment ((EGP)).

Despite indicating to the market targets for production and cash management for 2012 were still in line to be met, shorts in Linc Energy ((LNC)) increased for the week from May 28 to 6.73% from 5.41%. Shorts in Centro Retail ((CRF)) also increased to 2.28% from 1.15% the week before, this despite brokers turning more positive given some good news such as asset sale results and the settlement of a class action.

A recent trading update from Ten Network ((TEN)) indicated media market conditions remain difficult and this saw some minor cuts to earnings estimates for Seven West ((SWM)) as well. The market responded by lifting short positions in the stock to 3.3% from 2.26% previously.

Total shorts in Mirabela ((MBN)) declined for the week from May 28 to 3.1% from 4.46% as the market continues to adjust to the recent announcement of a capital raising. The raising should help reduce what had been some liquidity concerns surrounding the company.

The net largest decline in shorts was in Alesco ((ALS)), where positions fell to 2.11% from 3.16% previously. The change came prior to the pre-release of full year earnings, which the market generally viewed as solid given what remain difficult operating conditions, and a public offer by DuluxGroup ((DLX)). Alesco's board has rejected the offer.

Outside of those stocks in the top 20, increases in shorts for the month from May 4 were largest for Dart Energy ((DTE)) and Centro Retail, where in both cases shorts rose by just under 2.0 percentage points to 4.31% and 2.28% respectively. For Dart the changes came prior to the stock being removed from the S&P/ASX200 index.

Monthly falls in shorts were largest for Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) and Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)), the former falling to 1.03% from 4.72% and the latter to 2.66% from 6.31%. The changes for Whitehaven came prior to news the longwall at the Narrabri underground mine has been installed, while for Spark the market continues to adjust views in relation to the proposed acquisition of the Sydney de-sal plant.

The other fall in shorts of more than 2.0 percentage points for the month was in Henderson Group ((HGG)), where positions declined to 0.75% from 2.8% previously. The major news for the company in the period was IOOF Holdings ((IFL)) lifting its stake in the company.

 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 23734597 98850643 24.01
2 MYR 73693279 583384551 12.62
3 CRZ 28322705 233689223 12.15
4 FLT 11833312 100039833 11.82
5 FXJ 273740259 2351955725 11.64
6 DJS 58662263 528655600 11.06
7 COH 6180079 56929432 10.83
8 LYC 176783079 1714846913 10.31
9 ISO 566387 5703165 9.93
10 ILU 41017629 418700517 9.79
11 BBG 24170908 257888239 9.38
12 HVN 99837835 1062316784 9.38
13 PDN 75419878 835645290 9.03
14 GNS 75429556 848401559 8.88
15 CSR 41480002 506000315 8.21
16 WTF 16287604 211736244 7.69
17 EGP 49018195 688019737 7.14
18 LNC 34079022 504487631 6.73
19 TEN 64630518 1045236720 6.19
20 MSB 17572480 284478361 6.17

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

Changes in broker ratings over the past week have returned to the recent trend of downgrades outnumbering upgrades, with the eight brokers in the FNArena database lifting just five ratings while cutting 11 recommendations in the period. Total Buy ratings now stand at 49.07%.

Alumina ((AWC)) was one to be upgraded, BA Merrill Lynch moving to a Neutral rating from Underweight while suggesting news Chinalco is to cut output will be a positive in terms of bringing the global aluminium market into better balance. Other positives for the stock in the broker's view are some improvements on costs and improved value following recent share price weakness.

Views on Alumina were not all positive however, as JP Morgan downgraded to Underweight from Neutral on the view the current tough aluminium market conditions mean there are a lack of positive catalysts to drive the share price shorter-term. The broker is also concerned margin pressure could see dividends cut.

While a review saw RBS Australia lower earnings forecasts and price target for Billabong ((BBG)), the view is new management should be able to run the business more appropriately going forward. As well, RBS sees good relative value in the stock following recent share price weakness and so has upgraded to a Buy rating from Hold.

UBS has upgraded DuluxGroup ((DLX)) to Buy from Hold following the pre-release of full year earnings from potential target Alesco ((ALS)). The Alesco result showed enough that UBS estimates a successful acquisition by Dulux would be around 7% earnings accretive, while recent share price moves have improved the value offering at current levels.

Following changes to oil price assumptions JP Morgan has adjusted its model for Woodside ((WPL)), the result being a modest increase in price target. With improved valuation support the broker has upgraded to an Overweight rating from Neutral previously.

The changes to JP Morgan's expectations were not positive across the sector, as both Aurora Oil and Gas ((AUT)) and Beach Energy ((BPT)) were downgraded to Underweight ratings from Neutral previously on the changes to earnings expectations and price targets stemming from revised oil price forecasts.

On the downgrades side of the ledger, Ten network ((TEN)) as the only stock to suffer multiple downgrades with both BA-ML and UBS cutting ratings to Sell from Hold. The changes follow the decision by Ten Network to raise capital for programming and to strengthen the balance sheet.

UBS suggests the stock is now expensive at current levels given a soft earnings outlook, while BA-ML's view is the attempt to copy Seven's ((SWM)) strategy isn't working and a return to being a low cost broadcaster would be appropriate. Targets and earnings for Ten Network were cut across the market on news of the capital raising.

While Alesco's pre-released earnings were reasonably well received recent share price moves have the stock trading in line with valuation for Deutsche Bank. As a result, rating is downgraded to Neutral from Buy.

Macquarie was also busy with downgrades during the week, cutting Echo Entertainment ((EGP)), Qantas ((QAN)) and Telecom New Zealand ((TEL)) to Neutral recommendations from previous Buy ratings.

For Echo, a trading update saw Macquarie revise earnings forecasts and price target down modestly. A takeover could see a valuation of around $5.00 but a this suggests somewhat limited upside the broker has downgraded to a Neutral rating.

Qantas also lowered earnings guidance and Macquarie cut its numbers and price target accordingly. While seeing value at current levels Macquarie also sees few catalysts to suggest a share price rebound shorter-term, so rating is downgraded.

Increased competition remains an issue for Telecom New Zealand in Macquarie's view, as is an apparent lack of clear growth drivers. With this in mind valuation is fair rather than attractive in the broker's view.

Macquarie also downgraded Stockland ((SGP)) but to Sell from Neutral, suggesting the stock is now over-valued given consensus earnings forecasts appear too high for the medium-term. A review of assumptions sees minor cuts to earnings estimates.

Telstra ((TLS)) shares have enjoyed a solid run in recent months and in RBS Australia's view this reflects greater comfort with respect to future cash flows. The share price gains have probably run their course according to the broker, who downgrades to a Hold from Buy on valuation grounds.

While there were only minor positive changes in price targets over the week targets for both Qantas and Ten Network saw significant cuts, the former given lower earnings guidance and the latter as brokers adjusted their models for a capital raising.

From an earnings forecast perspective Whitehaven ((WHC)) and Goodman Group ((GMG)) saw brokers lift their expectations significantly, while Qantas, Ten and Echo were the stocks with the largest cuts in earnings estimates during the week.

 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 ALUMINA LIMITED Sell Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
2 BILLABONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Neutral Buy RBS Australia
3 DULUX GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy UBS
4 QR NATIONAL Neutral Buy Macquarie
5 WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LIMITED Neutral Buy JP Morgan
Downgrade
6 ALESCO CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
7 ALUMINA LIMITED Neutral Sell JP Morgan
8 AURORA OIL AND GAS LIMITED Neutral Sell JP Morgan
9 BEACH ENERGY LIMITED Neutral Sell JP Morgan
10 ECHO ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
11 QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
12 STOCKLAND Neutral Sell Macquarie
13 TELECOM CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
14 TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
15 TEN NETWORK HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
16 TEN NETWORK HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Sell UBS
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 WPL 50.0% 63.0% 13.0% 8
2 QRN - 25.0% - 13.0% 12.0% 8
3 ANZ 13.0% 25.0% 12.0% 8
4 HGG 40.0% 50.0% 10.0% 4

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 TEN - 13.0% - 38.0% - 25.0% 8
2 EGP 38.0% 13.0% - 25.0% 8
3 AUT - 20.0% - 40.0% - 20.0% 5
4 SGP 57.0% 43.0% - 14.0% 7
5 TEL - 13.0% - 25.0% - 12.0% 8
6 TLS 50.0% 38.0% - 12.0% 8
7 QAN 75.0% 63.0% - 12.0% 8
8 LLC 71.0% 63.0% - 8.0% 8
9 SGT 40.0% 33.0% - 7.0% 6
10 VBA 86.0% 83.0% - 3.0% 6
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 HGG 2.150 2.213 2.93% 4
2 TLS 3.460 3.485 0.72% 8
3 QRN 3.719 3.738 0.51% 8
4 AUT 3.870 3.874 0.10% 5

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 TEN 0.816 0.614 - 24.75% 8
2 QAN 2.120 1.638 - 22.74% 8
3 EGP 4.620 4.473 - 3.18% 8
4 LLC 9.089 8.896 - 2.12% 8
5 ANZ 24.404 24.256 - 0.61% 8
6 WPL 41.663 41.484 - 0.43% 8
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 WHC 6.957 10.371 49.07% 7
2 GMG 16.975 23.088 36.01% 8
3 IAG 25.163 25.538 1.49% 8
4 CTX 114.400 115.917 1.33% 6
5 AUT 27.953 28.168 0.77% 5
6 STO 70.088 70.625 0.77% 8
7 ALL 17.388 17.513 0.72% 8
8 PRY 23.050 23.200 0.65% 8
9 FWD 91.000 91.560 0.62% 5
10 AAX 32.860 33.040 0.55% 5

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 QAN 9.663 5.485 - 43.24% 8
2 TEN 3.525 2.328 - 33.96% 8
3 EGP 20.438 16.963 - 17.00% 8
4 SYD 5.700 5.200 - 8.77% 6
5 SGT 21.308 19.969 - 6.28% 6
6 WPL 254.843 241.337 - 5.30% 8
7 AIZ 3.211 3.056 - 4.83% 4
8 TCL 14.257 13.857 - 2.81% 7
9 BXB 40.345 39.914 - 1.07% 8
10 RIO 707.101 700.690 - 0.91% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

For the week from May 22 the largest short position increase on the ASX was in Sundance Resources ((SDL)), where positions rose from just 0.27% to 2.24%. This occurred just prior to the company presenting at a mining forum in Cameroon and agreeing some key terms for its Mbalam iron ore project.

The next largest increase was in Iluka ((ILU)), where shorts increased to 8.93% from 7.08% after the company updated both zircon sales guidance and the outlook for the zircon market in general. Lower sales volumes and a slow recovery in the market are priced into the stock at current levels in the view of Macquarie.

A jump in shorts to 8.89% from 7.46% previously for Gunns ((GNS)) comes on the back of an update from management that included news of the sale of the Heyfield timber business. Further asset sales are expected as is a significant capital raising, so changes in shorts likely reflect positioning for such an event.

Among those to enjoy significant falls in short positions for the week from May 22 were retail plays David Jones ((DJS)) and Myer ((MYR)), the former seeing a decline in shorts to 8.81% from 10.51% and the latter to 9.72% from 11.21%.

The change for David Jones came ahead of what was viewed by most as a disappointing 3Q sales result, though the result did at least give some indication sales were stabilising. The change for Myer follows a trading update that included a cut in earnings guidance, which led brokers to comment upcoming sales periods for both companies will be important for full year earnings.

Despite the falls in respective short positions both David Jones and Myer remain among the top 20 short positions on the Australian market, along with other consumer discretionary plays such as JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Billabong ((BBG)), Harvey Norman ((HVN)), Flight Centre ((FLT)) and Carsales.com ((CRZ)).

Also among the top 20 are Iluka, Paladin ((PDN)) and Lynas ((LYC)) among resource plays, Echo Entertainment ((EGP)) in the gaming sector, building materials play CSR ((CSR)), rural group Elders ((ELD)) and biotech play Mesoblast ((MSB)). Shorts in both Echo Entertainment and Paladin fell by around 1.0 percentage point in the week from May 22.

Shorts in Western Areas ((WSA)) declined to 4.66% from 6.07% the week prior after the market updated expectations to reflect higher production and sales guidance from the company, while shorts in Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) also declined to 0.74% from 1.94% as the company supplied an initial resource for the Ferndale project.

From the perspective of monthly changes in shorts for the period from April 26, Iluka experienced the largest increase with a move to 8.93% from 6.48% the month prior. Sparsely covered Linc Energy ((LNC)) also saw a jump in shorts to 5.58% from 3.34%, this despite management responding to an ASX query by confirming previous guidance for oil production and cash management for the full year.

A number of the top 20 short position stocks saw total positions increase by around 1.0% or more in the month from April 26, these including Billabong, Gunns, Harvey Norman, Flight Centre, Western Areas, CSR and Elders.

On the side of falling short positions, Whitehaven saw the greatest decline for the month, while utilities Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)) and Australian Pipeline Trust ((APA)) also enjoyed solid falls in total positions. For the former shorts fell to 2.29% from 5.46% and for the latter to 1.02% from 3.23% as the market continues to digest potential acquisitions in both cases.

Shorts in SingTel ((SGT)) declined to 3.6% from 5.93% the month before as the market viewed full year earnings as broadly in line with expectations, while a solid update indicating fund performance has been good and there is potential for an increase in fund inflows in coming months may have helped shorts in Henderson Group ((HGG)) fall to 0.69% from 2.26% previously.

Elsewhere in the market, RBS Australia notes Metcash ((MTS)) short positions have increased by more than 50 basis points over the past three weeks and now stand at 5.5%. In RBS's view such an increase is justified by weak trading conditions, which are expected to pressure independent supermarkets more than those of Coles and Woolworths ((WOW)). Such a trend would make it more difficult for Metash to sell many of its Franklins stores.

Investors should note past research conducted by RBS has shown that increasing/decreasing short positions for an individual stock can function as an early indication for the share price underperforming/outperforming respectively in the weeks/months ahead.
 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 23026494 98850643 23.29
2 FLT 11708664 100031742 11.70
3 CRZ 27135451 233689223 11.60
4 FXJ 269444917 2351955725 11.48
5 COH 6460589 56929432 11.32
6 LYC 175865064 1714846913 10.26
7 ISO 564043 5703165 9.89
8 MYR 56759223 583384551 9.72
9 BBG 24988441 257888239 9.69
10 ILU 37466989 418700517 8.93
11 GNS 75481203 848401559 8.89
12 HVN 94109184 1062316784 8.83
13 DJS 46649603 528655600 8.81
14 EGP 52714970 688019737 7.66
15 WTF 15883143 211736244 7.49
16 CSR 36894219 506000315 7.29
17 PDN 60483039 835645290 7.22
18 MSB 16644576 284478361 5.85
19 GWA 17206537 302005514 5.71
20 ELD 25258709 448598480 5.63

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

Earlier this month Western Areas ((WSA)) lifted production and sales guidance for FY12 but the news was not enough to stop the company from experiencing the largest increase in short positions for the week from May 15. Shorts in the stock rose to 6.07% from 4.66%.

The next most significant increase occurred in Goodman Fielder ((GFF)), where shorts rose to 2.9% from 1.63% the week prior. The increase preceded news Cargill was again showing interest in acquiring Goodman's Integro edible fats and oils business. The revived interest from Cargill was seen as something of a surprise given the previous approach had been rejected by the ACCC.

Among the falls in short positions for the week from May 15 the largest was in Mirabela Nickel ((MBN)), the change in positions to 2.97% from 5.17% coinciding with a capital raising by the company. An equity issue of $120 million was announced, Credit Suisse expecting the move will allay some of the market's concerns with respect to Mirabela's balance sheet.

SingTel ((SGT)) also enjoyed a fall in short positions, the total declining to 3.79% from 5.58% previously. The change followed a full year earnings result that broadly met market expectations, though Citi notes guidance for the coming year was somewhat uninspiring.

The next largest decline in shorts for the week was in M2 Telecommunications ((MTU)), where positions fell to 0.15% from 1.59% previously. As with Mirabela the change in positions in M2 follows a capital raising, as an entitlement offer raised more than $83 million to partially fund the recent acquisition of Primus Telecoms Holdings.

With none of the top 20 short positions experiencing much change over the week the consumer discretionary sector continues to dominate, with large short positions remaining in JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Myer ((MYR)), David Jones ((DJS)), Billabong ((BBG)) and Harvey Norman ((HVN)).

For the week from May 15 Flight Centre ((FLT)) and Carsales.com ((CRZ)) were the second and third largest short positions in the market behind JB Hi-Fi, Flight Centre seeing shorts increase in the month from April 20 to 11.66% from 10.09%.

Other significant increases for the month from April 20 were seen in both the aforementioned Western Areas and Paladin ((PDN)), the latter given the view in the market attention in coming months would focus on balance sheet and cash flow issues rather than production performance. For the month Paladin's shorts increased to 8.21% from 5.74% previously.

Dart Energy ((DTE)) experienced a doubling in shorts for the month from April 20 to 4.43% from 2.16% previously, this despite the company lifting its shale gas estimates to as much as 143TCF and indicating during the period its European business remained on track.

Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) enjoyed the largest fall in short positions for the month, positions declining to 1.94% from 7.26% previously at the same time as the company announced a takeover attempt for Coalworks ((CWK)), in which Whitehaven already held a 17% stake.

Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)) also saw shorts decline significantly for the month to 2.19% from 5.42% the month prior, this as brokers continue to adjust models and opinions on the stock to account for Spark's interest in acquiring the Sydney Desalination Plant.

Having previously indicated its intention to acquire Hastings Diversified ((HDF)) the need to address ACCC concerns saw Australian Pipeline Trust ((APA)) make some revisions to its proposal that Credit Suisse at least sees as increasing the likelihood the acquisition is allowed to proceed. As this was playing out shorts in APA fell for the month to 0.96% from 3.2% previously.

RBS Australia notes shorts in Telecom Corporation ((TEL)) have been edging higher over the past two months, the broker seeing this as reflective of ongoing earnings concerns over the medium-term. According to RBS, it will likely take around two years for Telecom to establish a solid base for operating gains, while an eventual re-focus on growth is likely to be somewhat painful shorter-term and require additional resources to be fully implemented. 

 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 23018840 98850643 23.29
2 FLT 11678508 100031742 11.66
3 CRZ 27060531 233684223 11.60
4 ISO 650567 5703165 11.41
5 MYR 65516262 583384551 11.21
6 FXJ 259056138 2351955725 11.04
7 COH 6238534 56929432 10.90
8 DJS 55607570 528655600 10.51
9 LYC 167718400 1714846913 9.78
10 BBG 23327926 257888239 9.02
11 HVN 95272471 1062316784 8.95
12 EGP 60321600 688019737 8.76
13 PDN 68323012 835645290 8.21
14 GNS 63345192 848401559 7.46
15 CSR 37024145 506000315 7.31
16 WTF 15263261 211736244 7.21
17 ILU 29689294 418700517 7.08
18 WSA 10906664 179735899 6.07
19 ELD 26464169 448598480 5.91
20 TRS 1516903 26071170 5.83

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

In the past week downgrades to recommendations from the eight brokers in the FNArena database have again outweighed upgrades to the tune of 14 to eight, the result being total Buy ratings now stand at 49.16%.

Among the positive ratings changes was RBS Australia shifting to a Buy rating on Campbell Brothers ((CPB)) from Hold previously, the broker taking the view there is now a buying opportunity in the stock given recent macro-driven selling across the market. Supporting the upgrade is RBS's expectation the upcoming full year result will include some positive commentary from management.

Gloucester Coal ((GCL)) has been upgraded by Macquarie to Neutral from Underweight previously, this a valuation call following changes to the broker's forex and commodity price assumptions. Similarly Macquarie has been busy changing ratings elsewhere among resource plays, with Paladin ((PDN)), Western Areas ((WSA)) and Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) also upgraded post the review. Paladin is lifted to a Neutral recommendation, while both Western Areas and Whitehaven have been upgraded to Outperform from Neutral.

Macquarie also made a change among industrial stocks by upgrading Woolworths ((WOW)) to Buy from Neutral, this as the broker sees potential upside now the company is putting together a solid strategy to deal with increased competition from the Wesfarmers ((WES)) owned Coles. Along with the upgrade Macquarie lifted its price target for Woolworths.

For JP Morgan, GPT ((GPT)) is now worthy of a Buy rating following relative underperformance against the REIT sector of late and given potential from the unlisted wholesale funds market. Some changes to earnings estimates mean an increase in price target.

Primary Health Care ((PRY)) is well placed to enjoy some margin recovery given improved market dynamics in the view of BA Merrill Lynch, and with the stock offering value at current levels the broker has upgraded to a Buy from Neutral previously. Price target has been lifted slightly.

On the downgrades side Toll Holdings ((TOL)) caught most attention, both UBS and Deutsche Bank lowering ratings to Hold from Buy following updated profit guidance from the company. Tough market conditions mean greater earnings volatility and UBS in particular doesn't see this as likely to attract investors at present. The revision to guidance saw brokers across the market adjust earnings estimates and price targets for Toll.

A below expectations quarterly from Alacer Gold ((AQG)) saw BA-ML lower earnings estimates and cut its price target, while the broker also downgraded to a Neutral rating from Buy previously given some uncertainty with respect to future capital allocation decisions. 

Valuation was behind Macquarie downgrading both Cabcharge ((CAB)) and Coca-Cola Amatil ((CCL)) to Neutral ratings from Outperform previously, while earnings estimates for the latter were trimmed post a trading update. 

Macquarie also downgraded Charter Hall Retail ((CQR)) to Sell from Buy on a similar valuation basis as the stock is now trading above the broker's price target, while Dexus (DXS)) was another property play to be downgraded by the broker on valuation grounds following recent gains. Macquarie has moved to a Neutral rating on Dexus from Buy.

Recent share price moves were also behind UBS's decision to downgrade Hastings Diversified ((HDF)) to Neutral from Buy, while Credit Suisse has made the same change for Industrea ((IDL)) as the share price has responded to a proposed takeover offer from GE of the US. 

A lack of earnings certainty with respect to Pacific Brands ((PBG)) has prompted Credit Suisse to downgrade the stock to Hold from Buy, a change reinforced by management cutting off potential M&A talks. 

Sonic Health Care ((SHL)) has acquired some additional pathology assets and the deal itself is a positive in the view of Credit Suisse, but again valuation has driven a downgrade to a Neutral rating from Buy previously. It is a similar story with SP Ausnet ((SPN)), Credit Suisse happy enough with the recent full year earnings result and capital raising but downgrading its rating to reflect recent share price gains. 

Given Incitec Pivot ((IPL)) is more exposed to soft explosives demand at present and following a somewhat lower quality profit result JP Morgan has downgraded to a Sell rating from Neutral previously, while others to cover the stock have generally trimmed earnings forecasts and price targets.

Over the week the most significant increase in price target was enjoyed by Cabcharge, while the largest cuts were for Toll, Alacer, CSR and Lynas Corporation ((LYC)). Centro Retail has seen earnings forecasts increased the most, while CSR, Toll Holdings and Australian Infrastructure ((AIX)) have experienced the most significant reductions in earnings estimates across the market.

 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup
Suisse,Deutsche<*br*>Bank,JP<*br*>Morgan,Macquarie,RBS<*br*>Australia,UBS&b0=118,99,109,102,79,140,151,122&h0=76,107,89,118,97,86,138,116&s0=41,22,25,6,32,32,11,15" style="border-bottom: #000000 1px solid; border-left: #000000 1px solid; border-top: #000000 1px solid; border-right: #000000 1px solid" />

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 Campbell Brothers Limited Neutral Buy RBS Australia
2 GLOUCESTER COAL LTD Sell Neutral Macquarie
3 GPT Neutral Buy JP Morgan
4 PALADIN ENERGY LTD Sell Neutral Macquarie
5 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Neutral Buy BA-Merrill Lynch
6 WESTERN AREAS NL Neutral Buy Macquarie
7 WHITEHAVEN COAL LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
8 WOOLWORTHS LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
Downgrade
9 ALACER GOLD CORP Buy Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
10 CABCHARGE AUSTRALIA LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
11 CHARTER HALL RETAIL REIT Buy Sell Macquarie
12 COCA-COLA AMATIL LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
13 CSR LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
14 DEXUS PROPERTY GROUP Buy Neutral Macquarie
15 HASTINGS DIVERSIFIED UTILITIES FUND Buy Neutral UBS
16 INCITEC PIVOT LIMITED Neutral Sell JP Morgan
17 INDUSTREA LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
18 PACIFIC BRANDS LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
19 SONIC HEALTHCARE LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
20 SP AUSNET Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
21 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
22 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 CRF 17.0% 50.0% 33.0% 6
2 WHC 83.0% 100.0% 17.0% 7
3 WSA 33.0% 50.0% 17.0% 6
4 CQO - 40.0% - 25.0% 15.0% 4
5 GPT 14.0% 29.0% 15.0% 7
6 PDN 29.0% 43.0% 14.0% 7
7 PRY 38.0% 50.0% 12.0% 8
8 MGX 13.0% 25.0% 12.0% 8
9 WOW 38.0% 50.0% 12.0% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 CQR 17.0% - 17.0% - 34.0% 6
2 TOL 43.0% 14.0% - 29.0% 7
3 NWS 57.0% 29.0% - 28.0% 7
4 HDF 75.0% 50.0% - 25.0% 4
5 CAB 60.0% 40.0% - 20.0% 5
6 LYC 100.0% 80.0% - 20.0% 5
7 AQG 86.0% 71.0% - 15.0% 7
8 DXS 29.0% 14.0% - 15.0% 7
9 IPL 63.0% 50.0% - 13.0% 8
10 CCL 38.0% 25.0% - 13.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 CAB 6.000 6.532 8.87% 5
2 SPN 1.003 1.030 2.69% 8
3 CRF 1.958 2.005 2.40% 6
4 SHL 13.324 13.559 1.76% 8
5 NWS 22.407 22.750 1.53% 7
6 CCL 12.911 13.100 1.46% 8
7 WOW 27.129 27.450 1.18% 8
8 WSA 5.858 5.908 0.85% 6
9 WHC 6.342 6.393 0.80% 7
10 GPT 3.353 3.364 0.33% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 CSR 2.279 1.983 - 12.99% 8
2 TOL 5.766 5.087 - 11.78% 7
3 AQG 10.196 9.067 - 11.07% 7
4 LYC 1.933 1.740 - 9.98% 5
5 PDN 2.084 1.956 - 6.14% 7
6 NAB 26.314 26.103 - 0.80% 8
7 CQO 3.502 3.478 - 0.69% 4
8 IPL 3.530 3.519 - 0.31% 8
9 CQR 3.313 3.310 - 0.09% 6
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 CRF 8.850 10.367 17.14% 6
2 TWE 19.271 19.986 3.71% 7
3 AMP 31.463 32.225 2.42% 8
4 NWS 131.424 133.151 1.31% 7
5 MIO 22.575 22.833 1.14% 4
6 CWN 57.363 57.900 0.94% 8
7 WPL 252.592 254.595 0.79% 8
8 CQO 24.667 24.860 0.78% 4
9 CPA 7.514 7.557 0.57% 7
10 BHP 323.398 325.065 0.52% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 CSR 17.488 14.775 - 15.51% 8
2 TOL 42.388 38.438 - 9.32% 7
3 AIX 18.467 16.933 - 8.31% 6
4 SUN 67.425 63.975 - 5.12% 8
5 WHC 7.267 6.914 - 4.86% 7
6 AQG 66.642 64.050 - 3.89% 7
7 IPL 27.275 26.456 - 3.00% 8
8 SWM 35.525 34.513 - 2.85% 8
9 PBG 7.688 7.475 - 2.77% 7
10 ILU 208.063 203.525 - 2.18% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

By Chris Shaw

For the week from May 1, cuts in short positions outweighed increases in shorts by around double based on a one percentage point cut-off measure. The largest change for the week was in Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)), where shorts fell to 1.72% from 5.61% the week before.

The change came post a quarterly production report that resulted in some cuts to earnings estimates in the market but prior to the company announcing a $1.00 per share bid for Coalworks ((CWK)). Success in the acquisition would offer potential for synergies at the Vickery project.

APA ((APA)) saw short positions fall to 1.44% from 3.8% the week before, this as the market continues to factor in a potential acquisition of Hastings Diversified Utilities ((HDF)). While the ACCC has raised some concerns with respect to the proposed acquisition, APA has responded with some revised undertakings that Credit Suisse suggests increases the likelihood the proposal receives regulatory approval.

Shorts in SingTel ((SGT)) declined to 3.97% from 5.89% in the week from May 1 as the market adjusted positions leading into the full year result, which largely met broker expectations. Paladin Energy ((PDN)) also saw a decline in shorts of more than one percentage point to 7.12%, this post the announcement of a convertible bond issue that brokers viewed as reducing refinancing risks for the company.

Beach Energy ((BPT)) delivered a better than expected March quarter production report and early shale fraccing is showing some promise, the report being followed by shorts in the stock declining for the week to 2.16% from 3.22%.

In terms of increases in short positions for the week from May 1, the largest was in David Jones ((DJS)) where total shorts rose to 10.83% from 8.88%. The change came as the stock continues to underperform, down almost 40% over the past year. The increase in shorts came before the announcement of some head office changes that should deliver some cost savings going forward.

The lift in short positions for David Jones confirms the company's place among the top-20 short positions on the Australian market. This list continues to be dominated by consumer discretionary stocks as the top 20 includes the likes of JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Myer ((MYR)), Billabong ((BBG)), Carsales.com ((CRZ)), Flight Centre ((FLT)) and Harvey Norman ((HVN)).

Also in the top 20 are media plays Fairfax ((FXJ)) and Ten Network ((TEN)), resource stocks Paladin and Iluka ((ILU)) and industrials such as CSR ((CSR)) and Gunns ((GNS)).

In terms of monthly changes from April 5, the largest increase is in Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)), positions rising to 6.29% from 1.43% previously. The market remains unconvinced of the benefits of the proposed acquisition of the Sydney Water Desalination plant, as while the deal would be earnings accretive management have little experience in the business.

The other largest monthly increase was in Paladin, where shorts rose to 7.12% from 3.92%. The increase comes after the company completed a convertible note issue to alleviate some refinancing risks but doesn't address some operational issues the company is dealing with.

Largest declines in shorts for the month from April 5 were in Beach Energy and Carsales.com. While the move to acquire a stake in Torpedo7 in New Zealand raised some questions about strategy for Carsales.com, brokers continue to expect solid growth in online display ads.

Among other changes in short positions, RBS Australia notes shorts in Leighton Holdings ((LEI)) have risen to 3.1% from 2.3% prior to the company releasing revised earnings guidance. A major issue for the company in the view of RBS is the group's capital position as there remains risk with respect to the need for further cash requirements.

RBS suggests Leighton will continue to underperform both its peers and the market and the broker recommends reducing exposure to the group.

 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 22332469 98850643 22.60
2 ISO 733044 5703165 12.85
3 MYR 67399279 583384551 11.56
4 FXJ 271035010 2351955725 11.55
5 DJS 56939484 524940325 10.83
6 COH 6118023 56929432 10.73
7 FLT 10009250 100031742 9.99
8 LYC 164111757 1714496913 9.58
9 CRZ 21143568 233684223 9.03
10 BBG 22990501 257888239 8.91
11 EGP 59491110 688019737 8.64
12 HVN 85880186 1062316784 8.07
13 ILU 32518188 418700517 7.75
14 GNS 61449507 848401559 7.23
15 PDN 59608465 835645290 7.12
16 CSR 33703822 506000315 6.64
17 SKI 83340340 1326734264 6.29
18 WTF 13114831 211736244 6.19
19 TEN 64363201 1045236720 6.16
20 TRS 1578168 26071170 6.07

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

By Chris Shaw

Changes in short positions for the week from April 24 were modest, only five companies seeing their total short positions change by more than 1.0 percentage point. Increases slightly outweighed decreases by three to two.

Among the increases was a 1.25 percentage point lift in Cochlear's ((COH)) shorts to 11.17% from 9.92% previously, which came ahead of a conference that led UBS to conclude the company's market share is likely to come under pressure in coming years as competitors introduce new products.

Shorts in Billabong ((BBG)) also rose for the week, climbing to 9.65% from 8.63% the week prior despite no new news from the company. Other discretionary retailers such as Harvey Norman ((HVN)) have struggled and delivered weak sales data in recent weeks, so the top short positions in the market continue to be dominated by stocks in this sector of the market.

As examples, the top 20 short positions include JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Myer ((MYR)), Flight Centre ((FLT)), David Jones ((DJS)) and Wotif.com ((WTF)). The media sector is also well represented with both Fairfax ((FXJ)) and Ten Network ((TEN)) in the top 20, while resource stocks are also included in the top 20 via the likes of Lynas Corporation ((LYC)), Iluka ((ILU)) and Paladin ((PDN)).

While not in the top 20, shorts rose in M2 Telecommunications Group ((MTU)) to 2.06% from 1.06% in the week from April 24 as the market adjusted to an entitlement offer from the company to help finance the acquisition of Primus Telecom Holdings.

Among the declines in short positions for the week the largest was in Carsales.com ((CRZ)), where total positions fell to 9.19% from 11.5%. This adjustment in positions came prior to a better than expected update on online advertising revenues, which was enough for Credit Suisse to lift earnings estimates modestly.

Shorts in Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) declined to 5.61% from 6.87% previously, brokers such as Citi remaining positive on the company given Whitehaven is now a rare breed as an independent coal producer with exposure to seaborne prices, making it the go to stock in the sector in that regard in the broker's view.

Monthly changes in shorts were more significant, both Paladin ((PDN)) and Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)) seeing increases of more than 4.0 percentage points for the month from March 30. For Paladin the changes were likely a reaction to a convertible note issue that helps address some short-term funding concerns, while for Spark the market continues to have mixed views on the proposed move to acquire the Sydney desalination plant.

Among the top 20, Myer, David Jones and Carsales.com (((CRZ)) all saw shorts decline by 1.5-2.1 percentage points in the month, while Wesfarmers partly protected shares ((WESN)) have seen shorts decline from more than 2.5% the month before to 0.1% now.

Beach Energy ((BPT)) saw shorts fall to 3.22% from 5.43% from the month before, this prior to better than expected March quarter production. On the flip side, some in the market viewed Beach's exploration performance during the March quarter as disappointing.

As noted, Ten Network is among the top 20 short positions on the market and RBS Australia sees this as reflective of ongoing TV ad market weakness and poor ratings for the network. The broker recently lowered earnings estimates to reflect these issues, which reinforced a Sell rating on the stock.
 

 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

?
ank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 21969268 98850643 22.21
2 ISO 725044 5703165 12.71
3 COH 6368476 56929432 11.17
4 MYR 64755077 583384551 11.10
5 FXJ 257611720 2351955725 10.96
6 FLT 10014423 100024697 10.00
7 BBG 24947895 257888239 9.65
8 LYC 159919500 1714496913 9.33
9 CRZ 21511549 233684223 9.19
10 DJS 46526079 524940325 8.88
11 EGP 57950189 688019737 8.41
12 PDN 69893003 835645290 8.36
13 GNS 61609897 848401559 7.25
14 HVN 76815948 1062316784 7.17
15 ILU 26640399 418700517 6.33
16 WTF 13180059 211736244 6.22
17 TEN 64330218 1045236720 6.13
18 CSR 30892376 506000315 6.09
19 TRS 1543849 26071170 5.93
20 SGT 9725769 165074137 5.89

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simple conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.