Tag Archives: Uranium

article 3 months old

Paladin Still Burning Cash

-Cost cutting to continue
-Cash flow trend still negative


By Eva Brocklehurst

Uranium miner Paladin Energy ((PDN))  has been diligent in cutting costs but unable to keep up with the falling price of the yellow stuff. Rapid falls in the uranium price this year have had a negative impact on the company's cash flow and it doesn't look like getting better any time soon.

Of the five brokers currently covering the stock on the FNArena database, two have updated commentary after the September quarter report - JP Morgan and UBS. Both brokers retain Neutral ratings on the stock, having both downgraded in August after the announcement of an US$88m capital raising. JP Morgan believes the stock is trading well below unrisked valuation. The broker's 50c price target of  reflects a 25% discount to valuation, relating to concerns over the cash flow trend. Paladin has three Hold ratings and two Sell on the database. The price targets range from 40c to 72c. The consensus price target of 57c suggests 38.5% upside to the last share price.

The company generated positive operating cash flow for the quarter of $3.4 million, but this was boosted by a $30m unwinding of working capital and low interest payments. Cash flow is still a big concern because, with uranium prices around US$35.75/lb and Paladin burning US$85m per annum in pre-debt repayments, cash is not hanging around. The cash balance at the end of the quarter was US$125m but UBS estimates, at the end of FY14, it will be reduced to US$32m at current spot prices.

Profitability was hampered by impairments in the quarter, even though revenue increased 13% from higher sales volumes. The company is committed to lowering costs further at both operations and head office. At Langer Heinrich the target is for unit costs to be lowered another 15% over FY14 and FY15. It's pushing up hill. Both Citi (Sell) and BA-Merrill Lynch (Underperform) have noted in the past that cost reductions are OK but have little impact in a realm of falling prices. Moreover, Paladin, according to Merrills, suffers from higher costs and gearing than its peers.

JP Morgan observed the improvement in operations and that costs continue to come down. Production is close to, or exceeding, nameplate. The problem is the speed at which prices are falling has been greater than the cost saving that were achieved. JP Morgan estimates the cash balance could reach US$35-45m by the end of FY14 at current trends and this makes a part sale of Langer Heinrich even more important. The company had terminated sale discussions with interested parties earlier in the year, unable to agree on an acceptable price, and instead undertook the placement to bolster the balance sheet. Paladin has indicated it would provide an update on the sale process by the end of this month.

Paladin has two producing mines, Langer Heinrich in Namibia and Kayelekera in Malawi. The company has projects in Queensland but current policy prohibits uranium mining.

FNArena noted last month there was little reason for Paladin to feel confident. The international uranium market is currently in balance on a demand/supply basis and the continually delayed re-start of Japanese reactors is the most important catalyst. Even when this happens there's not likely to be a significant rebound in prices because improvement is likely to be met with increased prices.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Buyers Re-Emerge For Uranium

By Greg Peel

As to whether last week saw some light at the end of the long, dark uranium tunnel last week is yet to be determined. Often in the post-Fukushima era we have seen the spot price rebound briefly off lows considered to be a line in the sand, only to suffer further drift-offs soon afterward. Once upon a time US$50/lb appeared to be an obvious floor, then 40 seemed ridiculous, until 35 was breached. Either way, last week industry consultant TradeTech’s spot price indicator rose US85c to US$35.10/lb.

October saw both traders and producers eager to offload unwanted inventories ahead of year-end. There has been plenty of material hanging over the market for some time, but until last month the sellers were hopeful of buying interest appearing at lower prices. Yet when that interest faded away, the sellers decided to bite the bullet, sending the spot price down US75c over the month.

Last week those eager sellers found buyers. Indeed, as the week progressed renewed buying interest saw prices increase and sellers with larger quantities back off, TradeTech reports. Seven transactions totalling 1mlbs of U3O8 equivalent were completed with both utilities and traders on the buy-side. Prices rose steadily over the week.

There were no transactions completed in the term markets last week. TradeTech’s term price indicators remain unchanged at US$37.25/lb (mid) and US$50.00/lb (long).

Floor price or head fake? Cash-burning producers can only pray.


Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Uranium Under Year-End Selling Pressure

By Greg Peel

For a short while it appeared as if the month of October would see some renewed strength in the price of spot uranium. It was not to be, nevertheless, as producers and traders began entering the market mid-month to offload material they did not wish to hold at year-end.

Cheaper prices brought out utilities and other traders but there was not sufficient demand, industry consultant TradeTech reports, to offset the downward pressure on the spot price. October saw 26 transactions completed in the spot market totalling 2.6mlbs of U3O8 equivalent. Transaction prices varied over the month depending on delivery location, delivery schedule and timing of payment.

Perhaps one glimmer of hope for uranium producers is that prices for transactions involving delivery before year-end were below prices for delivery in 2014.

TradeTech’s spot uranium price indicator closed the month at US$34.25/lb, down US75c from end-September. Four transactions were completed in the term market in October, and prices negotiated have forced TradeTech to lower its mid and long-term price indicators. The mid-term price falls US75c to US$37.25/lb and the long-term price falls US$1.00 to US$50.00/lb.

Last week closed on the first of November and there was no change to TradeTech’s US$34.25/lb spot price, which is down US60c from the week before. The week saw eight transactions totalling 800,000/lbs of U3O8 equivalent. As the week came to a close, sellers eased back their aggression, Trade Tech reports, allowing prices to stabilise.

Perhaps once producers and traders holding excess material have cleared the decks for year-end books-close the uranium price can find some fresh support in 2014. There was some good news last week, with Korea restarting one of the six of its 23 reactors that were shut down on safety concerns two months ago. With winter approaching, Korea is facing the potential of power shortages. Yet for uranium producers, many of them burning cash at current price levels, the fundamental hope is that 2014 will be the year in which Japan decides the cost of importing fossil fuels is too big a hit on an economy the government is trying to revive, and that the country’s reactors must be restarted sooner rather than later.

So far, no news.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Uranium Sellers Capitulate

By Greg Peel

A month ago there appeared to be some building interest from buyers in the short-term uranium market, and sellers were thus encouraged to hang back rather than let product go at low prices. But a hoped for rally in the uranium spot price failed to materialise, with one big order withdrawn and remaining orders failing to satisfy all sellers. The week before last, the spot market went ominously quiet. Last week, the sellers caved.

Industry consultant TradeTech reports six transactions in the spot market last week totalling 700,000lbs of U3O8 equivalent. Traders and utilities on the buy-side were happy to let the sellers close the gap, with both traders and producers looking to dispose of product ahead of year end. As a result, TradeTech’s spot price indicator fell US40c to US$34.85/lb.

One transaction was concluded in the term market last week, TradeTech reports, with a Russian producer contracting to supply first fuel for two new reactor units in China. There are various other contracts being evaluated by term buyers at present, but TradeTech’s term price indicators remain unchanged at US$38/lb (mid) and US$51/lb (long).

The world continues to await news on any escalated plans from Tokyo to restart Japan’s reactors, but with popular dissent still an issue it would not have helped the government’s cause that a magnitude 7.1 earthquake was registered off the east coast of Japan on October 25. The Fukushima plant suffered no further damage, but the quake was a reminder that aftershocks are expected to continue even this long after the 2011 disaster.

And to top things off, residents of a small Japanese island were preparing to evacuate late last week as Typhoon Francisco approached. The typhoon was ultimately downgraded, but not before TEPCO was forced to take additional precautions at Fukushima to prevent the possible overflow of accumulated radioactive water.

On the supply side, BHP Billiton ((BHP)) reported last week that uranium production at the world’s largest operating uranium mine, Olympic Dam, fell 6% in the September quarter due to lower grades and planned maintenance. Rival diversified miner Rio Tinto ((RIO)) had reported earlier that its quarterly uranium production fell 23%, largely as a result of the process of low grade stockpiles at majority-owned Energy Resources of Australia’s ((ERA)) Ranger mine, but also through lower production at the company’s Rossing mine in Namibia.


Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Uranium Market Slumbers

By Greg Peel

It’s not what struggling uranium producers want to hear. The spot market has gone dead quiet. While this implies no great urgency for holders of material to offload, it also indicates no increase in interest from uranium consumers at these low price levels. Indeed, industry consultant TradeTech’s spot price indicator has remained unchanged since October 4 at US$35.25/lb. Price recoveries are usually preceded by a final capitulation sell-off. In other words, price volatility.

TradeTech reports only two transactions in the spot market last week, totalling 200,000lbs of U3O8. There were no transactions in the term markets, and TradeTech’s term price indicators remain unchanged at US$38/lb (mid) and US$51/lb (long).

Interestingly, yesterday Japan posted its fifteenth successive monthly trade deficit, a run not seen since 1979. As a major exporter, Japan should be posting surpluses. Japan did see some improvement in exports during the month, particularly to China, but on the other side of the ledger the levels of fossil fuel energy the country has been forced to import is ensuring ongoing deficits. Yet still there is little word from the Japanese government regarding policy on the restart of the country’s nuclear reactors.

Japanese reactor restarts remain the swing factor for the global uranium industry.

There was positive news out of the UK during the week, TradeTech reports, with the UK apparently set to move ahead on two new reactors at the Hinkley Point site. Meanwhile, Canadian uranium companies have been in the spotlight, with Uranium One’s major shareholder, Russian state-owned Atomredmetzoloto (trying saying that quickly), moving to buy out the company and take it private, and Australia’s Toro Energy ((TOE)) moving forward with its acquisition of the Lake Maitland project in WA from Mega Uranium.

Low uranium prices are offering up industry consolidation.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Little Optimism In Uranium Market

By Greg Peel

Olympic Dam is Australia’s largest uranium source but outside of the diversified resource conglomerate that is owner BHP Billiton, Australia’s two “big” pure-play uranium producers are Energy Resources of Australia ((ERA)), operating in the Northern Territory and Paladin Energy ((PDN)) operating in Namibia.

ERA has become basically a binary trade as an investment stock. Having been devastated by floods over past years, ERA’s sole Ranger Mine has been undergoing rehabilitation ever since above ground. That rehab is ahead of time and budget, but ERA’s fortunes depend entirely on whether or not the company decides to proceed with the Ranger Deeps underground mine. If so, well and good, if not, goodnight. In the meantime ERA is simply processing stockpiled ore.

The story is different for Paladin. Once the great Australian uranium hope, Paladin is continuing to burn cash at current uranium prices. The company’s latest quarterly production report showed prices received above spot, but lower than forecast production due to an extended maintenance shutdown at the Kayekalera development. Having already raised fresh funding, Paladin can only pray for a rebound in uranium prices sooner rather than later.

There is little reason for Paladin to feel confident. At the International Uranium Fuel Seminar held in Texas last week, the tone was less than optimistic for uranium sellers, industry consultant TradeTech reports. The international uranium market is currently in balance on a demand-supply basis, despite the Russian HEU agreement coming to a conclusion. Japanese reactor restarts remain the swing factor, but even then there is no great expectation of a significant price rebound given any price improvement will only be met with increased production.

A total of four transactions totalling 400,000 pounds were concluded in the spot market last week, TradeTech reports, and the year to date spot transactions total of 32.2mlbs is ahead of the 23.8mlbs booked by this time last year. Yet there has been little joy in pricing terms, with the consultant’s weekly spot price indicator unchanged on US$35.25/lb.

One US utility looking for 1.3mlbs in the term market selected a supplier last week, and several other term buyers are evaluating offers. The term market is more active than the spot market at present, but TradeTech’s price indicators remain at $38/lb (mid) and US$51/lb (long).

 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Material Matters: China’s Seasonality, Uranium, Nickel, Iron Ore Production

-China's seasonality to the fore
-Uranium under further pressure
-Better outlook for nickel producers
-What's in Sep quarter production reports?

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

What is changing in patterns of demand in commodity markets? As China has evolved to be the dominant buyer of many commodities, the seasonal effects in this region of the globe have started to exert a greater influence on many markets. These effects are both weather-related and also framed by buying patterns. The impact on production and demand has greater predictability than the impact on pricing, in Deutsche Bank's view. The broker has examined the case for thermal coal and iron ore as well as the individual base metal markets in an attempt to discern pricing patterns.

Based on China's percentage of global consumption, which is around 70% of the seaborne iron ore market and 40-45% of the base metals market, these two are the most likely to be affected by seasonal effects within China. Coking and thermal coal are influenced as well, but to a lesser degree. In terms of production, China contributes nearly 50% of global thermal coal and aluminium production, around 30-35% of copper, zinc and nickel and only 16% of global iron ore.

The results of Deutsche Bank's analysis show that, in thermal coal, small variations in China's domestic demand and supply can have an impact. Demand for electric power in China peaks in July and August and dips in February. Hence, thermal coal demand follows the same pattern and this is despite the July/August peak in hydro power output. Iron ore imports, as with base metals, are influenced by the New Year holidays, with a slow start in January and February before ramping up in March. Imports of iron ore have tended to fall to the lowest levels in October because of the mid-autumn festival and week-long National Day holiday before recovering to end the year on a high.

In terms of iron ore production China's peak production month is in June or July and the average price trough for iron ore has, historically, coincided with the same months. Copper imports start low in January and February and ramp up in March, before slowing in the summer months to coincide with weaker construction and infrastructure activities. The lowest level for refined copper imports is seen in October, before a recovery occurs towards year-end. This year, Deutsche Bank notes, refined copper imports have bucked the trend and the broker suspects this was because of abnormal seasonal growth in industrial activity and a shortage of  scrap.

Uranium's spot price has fallen a further 13% to US$35/lb. The 8-year low has been driven by ongoing issues at Fukushima and further delays to re-starting reactors in Japan, which in a normal year would represent 12% of global uranium demand. JP Morgan has reduced earnings estimates for Australian uranium stocks as a result. The broker thinks these problems in Japan have resulted in an inventory overhang which, despite the expiry of the Russian HEU contract at the end of this year, and the fact that current uranium prices are less than half of estimated inducement prices, has made utilities reluctant to secure long-term supply and drive prices higher. JP Morgan has lowered forecasts by 8% in 2013 to US$39/lb, by 22% in 2014 to US$45/lb and 14% in 2015 to US$60/lb.

The broker retains an Underweight rating on Energy Resources Australia ((ERA)) as the stock is trading above the risk weighted price target of $1.30 a share. The other Australian uranium stock, Paladin Energy ((PDN)), is being hampered by weak uranium prices and struggles to deliver positive cash flow at a time when costs are being managed better.  In this instance, the stock is trading well below the broker's unrisked valuation so a Neutral rating is retained.

Nickel miners have garnered scrutiny from Macquarie, resulting in changes to the modelling of Western Areas ((WSA)), Independence Group ((IGO)) and Panoramic Resources ((PAN)). Sirius Resources ((SIR)) and Mincor Resources ((MCR)) have now been added to the broker's coverage. Western Areas is the top preferred stock but Sirius is also preferred. The broker may have recently downgraded short and medium-term nickel price forecasts to reflect the oversupply of the metal, but still forecasts a strong recovery over the next five years. The compound annual growth rate over those five years is forecast at 7% for US dollar denominated nickel prices and 12% for Australian nickel prices. Assumptions include a negative 4% compound annual growth rate in the AUD/USD exchange rate over the same period.

This price improvement should mean profitability for Australian nickel producers is significantly better in years to come. Based on Wood Mackenzie's global nickel cost curve and Macquarie's estimates, most Australian nickel producers are not generating meaningful cash flow at current spot prices. A recovery to the extent implied by Macquarie's modelling should enable most producers to be back in the black by 2015. Aside from Sirius, where Nova production comes on stream in FY17, other producers that won't generate meaningful earnings in FY14 are Panoramic and Mincor. Independence is considered much less sensitive to movements in nickel prices because it is more diversified.

Iron ore exports from Australia increased in the September quarter and UBS expects production to have followed this trend. Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) is expected to reach nameplate production and UBS estimates iron ore shipments of 28m tonnes in the quarter, up 17%. Atlas Iron ((AGO)) has stated it shipped a record 960,000t during August and is on track to ship 2.3-2.4mt in the quarter. Rio Tinto ((RIO)) also had a strong month in August, shipping 22.8mt. BHP Billiton ((BHP)) is expected to drop slightly from the June quarter. UBS forecasts September quarter production of 45.2mt, down 5%. BHP's metallurgical coal production is forecast to fall 15% quarter on quarter because of scheduled maintenance, while energy (thermal) coal is expected to be down 1%. BHP's copper production is forecast to be down 2% in the quarter. In the gold sector, UBS expects most producers will report improved cost metrics over the September 2013 quarter with Newcrest Mining ((NCM)) the exception because of lower expected output at Lihir.

Of interest, during the September quarter three of of the resources companies covered by UBS received proposals that could result in a change of ownership. Inova ((IVA)) received a bid from Shanxi Donghui, Perilya ((PEM)) received a proposal from its largest shareholder, Zhongjin Lingnan to acquire the outstanding shares and Discovery Metals ((DML)) received a recapitalisation proposal that would see the Singaporean domiciled Blumont Group take a 60% stake.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Uranium Ticks Up

By Greg Peel

Activity in spot uranium remains limited while term market interest is building. The uranium term market is what we might call the “real” market, featuring global nuclear utilities arranging delivery contracts over periods of time on the buy-side and actual producers of uranium on the sell-side. Such contracts are tendered and negotiated and things move slowly. When you are looking for, say, five years’ worth of U3O8 supply, there’s no real need to rush.

The spot market, on the other hand, is the forum for utilities to jump in to cover inventory shortfalls or for producers to cover shortfalls on contract obligations. To do so requires speculators in the market – uranium traders and hedge fund commodity investors – to offer up liquidity as they try to exploit the short-term needs of the “real” players. When the uranium market is “hot”, as it was in 2006 for example, the spot market becomes a hot bed of speculation and liquidity. When it is “cold” has it has been post Fukushima, no one much wants to play.

Last week three utilities and two intermediaries concluded spot purchases totalling around 600,000lbs of U3O8 equivalent, industry consultant TradeTech reports. TradeTech’s spot price indicator has been range-trading of late and having fallen US25c the week before, last week the indicative price rose US25c to US$35.25/lb. While prices under US$40 offer up doldrum territory for the commodity, sellers are reluctant to be too aggressive given the balance of apparent supply in the term market.

New demand continues to emerge for term supply contracts, TradeTech reports. Three global utilities are currently evaluating U3O8 delivery offers, one for 1.3mlbs in 2016, one for 1mlbs in 2015-19, and one for 1.2mlbs over a six-year period. Another utility is seeking 900,000lbs via UF6 or highly enriched product for 2015-20. It’s not if the demand isn’t there.

It’s just that no one is in a hurry. TradeTech’s term price indicators remain unchanged at US$38/lb (mid) and US$51/lb (long).

Meanwhile, Australian producer Paladin Energy ((PDN)) last week updated the market on the cost-cutting program it announced a year ago. Costs at the company’s Namibian operations are to be reduced by 25% and 22% at Langer Heinrich and Kayelekera respectively, with salaries for the board also to fall by 10%.

Analysts at UBS applaud the cuts but note such expectation was already priced in, with spot uranium doldrums and subsequent cash burn remaining the company’s critical issue.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Longer Term Weakness For Uranium?

By Greg Peel

The short burst of enthusiasm witnessed on the spot uranium market two weeks ago ran out of legs last week once the handful of prospective buyers were filled on their orders and left, industry consultant TradeTech reports. While further interested parties, including utilities and traders, entered the market last week, sellers, including producers and traders, were quick to respond.

The result was six transactions totalling 700,000lbs of U3O8 equivalent but a drop in TradeTech’s spot price indicator of US25c to US$35.00/lb. Tradetech’s term price indicators remain steady at US$38.00/lb (mid) and US$53.00/lb (long).

The week ended on a slightly brighter note, nevertheless, when the Tokyo Power Company requested safety inspections ahead of the restart of units 6 and 7 at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant 200k up the coast from the capital. The seven-unit K-K nuclear plant is the world’s largest, and units 6 and 7 the world’s newest reactors.

The restart of Japan’s reactors is pivotal to rebooting the global uranium market, most believe, and thus to stronger spot pricing. The K-K units bring to fourteen the number in Japan on the pending restart list. The market had been hoping for swifter action when the new, pro-nuclear Abe government was elected late last year, but has been disappointed to date with the ongoing delay.

BA-Merrill Lynch is one broker forced to reduce its 2013-15 forecast uranium prices based on this delay. Merrills has downgraded its 2014 spot forecast by 24% to US$47.50/lb, expecting 7 million pound surplus of U3O8 at the end of 2014 rather than the 14mlb deficit earlier forecast.

Yet while the Merrills analysts are responding only to the Japanese delay, peers at Macquarie now believe the uranium market will remain in surplus throughout their five-year forecast period, Japanese restarts or no Japanese restarts. Macquarie has also swiftly dismissed the end of the US-Russian HEU supply agreement as offering little impact as well.

One issue for Macquarie is the difference between the growing demand for nuclear capacity, which is assumed will drive growing demand for uranium, and actual demand for uranium. Various global regulatory hurdles, including post-Fukushima regulation tightening, have delayed reactor projects, the analysts note. Hence while pending start-ups might add to incremental global nuclear capacity, the start-up uranium required was actually purchased some time ago.

Note that reactors require a significant level of uranium to start them up but comparatively little to keep them going.

Beyond that disappointing truth, uranium inventories across all major consumers sit at record highs, Macquarie notes. In Japan alone, the 7500 tonnes of material accumulated since the Fukushima accident is enough to cover the needs of the twelve reactors having applied for a restart (which has now grown to fourteen). In the US, inventories sit near levels representing two years of consumption, the highest level in decades.

At least the market can be relieved that China, which has the most number of reactors planned or in development, just keeps on buying uranium. Indeed, year to date 2013 imports exceed the equivalent 2014 period by four times, Macquarie exclaims.

But as has long been the case, China does not operate under a system of buying materials when they are needed and not when they are not. The many state-owned enterprises ensure China the luxury of stockpiling material when prices are low and then de-stocking when prices rise. Hence China is no longer likely to be a price supporter (as was the case in the noughties commodity boom), rather a price taker. And on the upside, China is an effective price capper once stocking turns to de-stocking.

Macquarie nevertheless admits there hardly is an explosion occurring on the uranium supply side either. Kazakhstan is providing the only meaningful growth among major producing regions, while Areva’s operations in Niger are being disrupted, Energy Resources of Australia’s ((ERA)) Ranger mine is currently only running down stockpiles and Cameco’s huge Cigar Lake development in Canada has yet again been delayed.

But Cigar Lake will eventually ramp up one way or the other, Macquarie warns. And while the end of the HEU agreement means the end of years of dismantled warhead supply, the hole left will only prove incremental, say the analysts, given supply of alternative Russian secondary material and growing supplies from global reprocessing.

The good news is that Macquarie suggests the global uranium surplus will indeed narrow over the next couple of years given an entry cost level of some US$40-45/lb for new mined supply. But any price rebound will be slow and gradual and then capped at around US$60/lb (2013 dollars), as this price is enough for postponed mining projects, mostly in Africa, to fire up once more.

Macquarie’s dour predictions contradict the greater level of medium to long term enthusiasm suggested by industry consultant UxC’s survey of attendees at the World Nuclear Association Annual Symposium, held last month, which suggested belief in prices down the track well in excess of US$60/lb.


Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Material Matters: Coking Coal, Iron Ore, Prices, Production And Productivity

-Coking coal outlook robust
-Iron ore prices find support
-Uranium, gold price forecasts eased
-Copper tops base metals for Merrills
-Goldman: focus on productivity not cost

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

Prices for coking coal produced a wild ride for US equities in recent years. Bumper profits helped, but JP Morgan suggests this connection is now at an end and the impact of falling coking, or metallurgical, coal prices on equities is probably over. Having said that, the broker thinks US producers of the black stuff face significant headwinds. The Australian benchmark price has been reported to have settled at US$152/t, a better look after the spot price fell as low as US$129.5/t in July. What's disappointing for US-based coal producers is that the most recent reports show the (FOB) price for equivalent US coking coal is US$10/t below the Australian level. This difference in the price for the Pacific and Atlantic regions highlights the dichotomy of stabilising Chinese demand and weak European and Brazilian demand.

The biggest driver of the higher benchmark price has been the recovery in the Australian dollar from lows of US89c to the recent level around US94c. Now, the broker is not of the view that the Australian dollar drives the coking coal benchmark but that both the coal price and the Australian dollar reflect changes in Chinese demand for raw materials. The lower local currency also lowers the marginal cost of production. US producers were helped when the Aussie was holding well above parity. With Australian miners now more competitive and planning to expand production, the broker suspects US miners will be deeply pondering the upcoming contract renewals with the US steel makers for 2014.  JP Morgan expects a mild recovery in metallurgical coal prices in 2014, averaging US$161/t for the Australian benchmark.

Production costs among metallurgical coal producers in Australia fell 14% in the first half of 2013 relative to the second half 2012 but Goldman Sachs expects excess capacity and falling costs will limit further improvement. This is because spot prices are already at US$150/t , the broker's upper estimate of cost support, while seaborne prices have overshot relative to Chinese domestic prices, suggesting that Chinese import volumes could ease in coming months. On that basis, Goldman's 2014 forecasts are raised to US$150/t but 2015-17 forecasts are unchanged. Further production cuts are seen as necessary over 2013-15 in order to offset the incremental supply from growth projects that are coming on stream and allow for some pricing tension to emerge.

Australian production costs have benefited from several tailwinds and the local coal sector appears robust to Goldman as well. Recovery from the 2010-11 floods means mines affected by water management problems are now at full production. Production volumes across six BHP Billiton ((BHP)) mines are in line with the same period prior to the floods. More broadly for the Australian coal sector, port throughput at the main coal export terminals in Queensland looks like exceeding previous record levels, set in 2010. Goldman also thinks the depreciation of the Aussie has been beneficial for producers, since approximately 70% of operating costs are denominated in local currency. The recent focus on efficiency and cost control has reduced overhead costs, put greater pressure on commercial terms with suppliers and contractors, and generated higher volumes.

Macquarie observes 2013 as a year where commodity demand has exceeded expectations. This is the first in four years that the analysts have increased demand forecasts mid year. Nevertheless, prices are still reflecting excess supply characteristics. Coal supply is seen starting to react to this pressure and the analysts have reduced expectations for metallurgical coal.

Macquarie has raised near-term iron ore forecasts to US$90/t CFR China (62% iron) from US$80/t previously. Macquarie expects prices to average over US$100/t in the medium term. After analysing steel demand and both the Chinese domestic iron ore industry as well as the seaborne market, the analysts conclude that iron ore prices will remain above US$115/t over the next two years and be above US$100/t out to 2020. Looking at the Chinese domestic ore situation, Macquarie finds that nearly 40% of Chinese capacity will be uneconomic by 2018 under base case forecasts. Also, financial and political incentives to support a loss-making sector are no longer present. In terms of seaborne expansion, half of the proposed projects will require a long-run price of over US$100/t to generate a good return and subsequently, depending on the timing to market, many could be at risk. Hence, Macquarie's base case seaborne supply additions of 380mt through 2020 are well below market expectations, as many prospective additions are not expected to develop.

One aspect of the analysis suggests there'll be less volatility in iron ore prices, with a 200mtpa annualised swing from peak to trough in iron ore demand within any given year. This may be affected by the incentives and displacement of marginal tonnes at various points in the cycle but Macquarie sees the upper end of the curve flattening, resulting in lower levels of volatility over time. The potential for overshooting and undershooting the price estimates will stand, but the lower volatility could be the catalyst for positive re-rating of equities. The broker's view is that US$85-90/t represents a floor in cyclical price swings and this favours the major producer as their top tier assets mean they will not be subject to the competitive behaviour smaller companies will be engaged in.

BA-Merrill Lynch has also reviewed iron ore price forecasts. Inventory is seen elevated and the modelling suggests some downside to prices. However, while inventories at mills are high they have not reached alarming levels. Downside should be limited and the analysts are comfortable with a Q413 price forecast at US$125/t. For 2014, the analysts' price estimate is unchanged at US$110/t. Preferred iron ore exposures in this scenario are Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) and Atlas Iron ((AGO)).

Citi is more bearish on short-term iron ore prices, with a 3-month price forecast of US$115/t. Moreover, the analysts believe risks are skewed to the downside. Chinese demand is expected to be pressured by credit tightening that began in the June quarter and intensified over the northern summer. Recent data is also less reassuring. Strong Chinese steel production and iron ore imports in recent months have masked weaker fundamentals, in Citi's view. Excess steel production has been pushed onto international markets, while iron ore inventories have been rebuilt at lower prices. Citi expects expect weaker steel production and softer demand for imported ore in Q413. A surge in seaborne iron ore supply is expected over the coming months, driven by increases in Australian exports from Rio Tinto ((RIO)), BHP Billiton ((BHP)) and Fortescue Metals. This has led to expectations that Q413 production will increase by a record 34mt year on year and 12mt quarter on quarter. Large quantities of Brazilian ore are also currently in transit as a result of inventory drawdown after rail problems were resolved.

BA-Merrill Lynch has reduced gold price forecasts as the US Federal Reserve's decision to taper QE creates headwinds. Prices may remain supported in the run-up to the US fiscal debt ceiling. The gradual normalisation of monetary policy in the coming quarters should bring sustained pressure to gold prices and the analysts have lowered 2014 price forecasts by 17% to US$1,294/oz. The broker's preferred gold stock is Alacer Gold ((AQG)).

The broker has also taken the blade to earnings from uranium producers because of large downgrades to forecast spot prices -11%, 24% and 8% in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively - and contract uranium prices - 4%, 6% and 7% in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively. Prices have been lowered because of soft Japanese demand as nuclear reactor re-starts are delayed. As a result, the previously expected uranium supply-demand balances has turned from a around 14mn lbs deficit at the end of 2014 to a 7mn lbs surplus. Preferred uranium stock is Energy Resources Australia ((ERA)). As a result of the supply headwinds, Macquarie has also made significant downgrades to uranium and molybdenum prices for the coming years.

Copper remains the top base metals pick for Merrills. While prices have stabilised, stronger economic activity in China has had only a limited impact on the physical market, partially because market participants have continued to de-stock. In Merrills' opinion the reduction of stocks will gradually subside and along with higher growth in China, the US and Europe, copper should average US$3.27/lb in Q413. Preferred copper stocks are PanAust ((PNA)) and OZ Minerals ((OZL)).

Finally, productivity - the third 'P'. Over the past decade, Goldman Sach,s observes productivity within the Australian mining sector fell around 30%, as mining companies were focused on volume rather than value. That focus, coupled with rising commodity prices, delivered profit growth but masked falling productivity. Now that growth is more subdued a renewed focus on productivity is required. In fact, the broker thinks shareholders should demand it. Goldman's analysis shows that the combination of commodity currency deflation, a cyclical downswing in consumables and improved productivity has the potential to reduce costs by more than 15%. So, rather than judging companies on cost cutting strategies investors should attend to the productivity measures that the companies are targeting. To Goldman, this is a better reflection of operational quality and provides a more sustainable path to cost reduction.

Improving productivity would ultimately deliver the benefits of greater volume and falling costs. A cost cutting scenario is not the broker's base case, but Goldman thinks it could drive significant reductions in commodity price forecasts, margin compression and value destruction. Assuming long-term marginal cost support falls 10% across all commodities, valuations for mining companies within the broker's coverage would be 11-27% lower than base case. BHP remains the broker's preferred exposure in the sector due to the relative valuation, lower downside risk in a cost-cutting scenario and asset diversification.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.