Tag Archives: Agriculture

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report (Monday): A New Deal For Bear Stearns

By Greg Peel

I trust everyone had an enjoyable Easter break. For FNArena this meant a weekend out on the company's luxury cruiser, on which we soon hope to be hosting lavish harbour cruise events for our subscribers. A photo of me on the bridge appears below.

The big news on Wall Street last night was JP Morgan's increased bid for Bear Stearns. The market recognises that the original US$2 bid, which was agreed between JPM, the Fed and Bear Stearns, was largely symbolic. In other words, Bear was actually bankrupt. But there has been a big Bear shareholder backlash ever since, particularly given the US$236m bid was well short of even the US$1.2bn value of Bear's New York headquarters.

JPM has now raised the bid to US$10, with the Fed's approval. By doing so all parties believe this will put a deal to bed that needs to be put to bed as quickly as possible. One assumes JPM was probably happy to pay this amount in the first place but was under instruction from the Fed. For it is still, in reality, the Fed's deal. JPM is just the conduit.

Under the deal the Fed will lend JPM US$30bn against the Bear portfolio, which will in turn be managed by fund manager BlackRock. JPM will take the risk on US$1bn only of that US$30bn, while the Fed will participate in any profits derived from the orderly unwinding of the portfolio. In other words, it's as good as a temporary nationalisation. Bold speculators who bought Bear at UD$5 after the US$2 announcement have done well, and the shares closed at US$11.38, up 88%, as some traders are still prepared to speculate on a separate white knight appearing.

Either way, it was good news for financials as it implies there was more value in Bear than initially assumed. While financial sector stocks had a mixed session after the big rally on Friday, the broad market found another reason to be more confident. Adding to the happy glow were the latest housing data.

New home sales in February rose 2.9% - the first rise since October. The market was expecting another decline. Inventories fell 3%. The clue to the good result no doubt lies in the house price index figure, which at -8.2% year-on-year was the biggest decline since the National Association of Realtors began their tracking service in 1999. Now that house prices have fallen significantly, the buyers have started to get interested. And throw in what the Fed is doing, and what the government is doing for the sponsored mortgage lenders, and then a mortgage is becoming a little bit easier to obtain.

The home building sector jumped on the news, and helped the Dow to its 187 point, or 1.5%, gain. The S&P also added 1.5%. The other sector (outside of financials and home builders) to see renewed buying interest is the tech sector. The Nasdaq jumped 3% last night, to add to its 2.2% rise on Thursday. That's the best two-day session in five years.

Tech has been another recipient of the switch trade, the one in which everyone is getting out of commodity stocks. It was a mixed night for commodities, following on from two sessions of solid weakness. The US dollar eased slightly against the euro, but continued its recovery against the yen, to be back over 100 yen. London metal markets were closed for the holiday.

So there were no movements in base metals. Gold pulled back from the precipitous fall of the past two sessions, adding US$5.10 to US$915.20/oz.. Silver also managed a slight bounce - US28c to US$16.99/oz. Oil continued its weakness, falling US98c to US$100.86/bbl, although the solid housing numbers did stem the tide of selling somewhat. There were also bounces amongst some of the softs. Wheat rose 3.3%.

The Aussie dollar - which has been yo-yoing on interest rates, carry trades, and its "commodity currency" status these past few sessions, managed to pull back about US0.8c to be US$0.9072. This means there has been little change since the Australian close on Thursday.

The SPI Overnight was closed last night, which leaves us with a total 447 point gain in the Dow since Australia took off for the holiday, but only 11 points up in the SPI in the Thursday session. One presumes we'll do better than that today in the market, although it should be noted that BHP Billiton ((BHP)) and Rio Tinto ((RIO)) were each down over 5% in London on Thursday night. London was closed last night.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Dow Fails, Commodities Crucified

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed down 293 points on its lows or 2.4%, while the S&P gave back 2.4% and the Nasdaq 2.6%.

It's heartbreaking stuff, but it may yet prove to be all part of a protracted bottoming process.

Just when Wall Street believed it was safe to go back into the financial sector water news came out that Merrill Lynch may have to write-down a further US$3bn which it had not anticipated. This is due to an insurance firm questioning its obligations to pay Merrills on coverage of US$3bn of credit default swaps. Merrill Lynch intends to sue the insurance firm to recover the money, but another seed of doubt has been sown in Wall Street's financial sector.

The news overshadowed a first quarter result from Morgan Stanley which mirrored the results of Goldman Sachs and Lehman Bros yesterday. Morgan lost 42% compared to the same quarter last year, but it did beat the Street on earnings estimates. Its shares rallied initially on the news, until Merrills-related selling saw them pull back to only a slight gain.

It was not the case elsewhere in the sector. After euphoric gains yesterday, Merrills lost 8%, Goldmans 5%, Lehman 9% and Bear Stearns 11%, for what the latter is worth. The commercial/investment banks held up better, with Citigroup only losing 1.5% and JP Morgan 0.5%.

But while the financial sector turnaround was disappointing, the sector that really copped a beating today was materials.

The word on the Street is that in light of the Bear Stearns collapse, the implications thereof for all investment banks, and the lifeline provided by the Fed rescue package, investment banks are telling their hedge fund clients that the days of extreme leverage are over. At the very least, positions running in the realms of 10x leverage will need to be pulled back to more like 5x. To achieve this, hedge funds are thus forced to reduce some of their high leverage investments.

And what has been the popular target of hedge fund investment lately? Commodities. Last night saw a major rout across the commodity spectrum, from gold to oil to metals and grains.

Gold fell US$37.90, or close to 4%, to US$943.50/oz. Silver fell US$1.28, or 6.5%, to US$18.37/oz. Platinum, which traded close to US$2300/oz this month, has now fallen to US$1907/oz.

Oil fell US$4.94, or 4.5%, to US$104.48/bbl. Oil was not helped by the weekly figures that showed demand for both heating oil and gasoline had actually fallen. Wheat fell 7.7%.

Aluminium and copper were down over 2%, nickel and zinc were down around 4%, and lead was down close to 5%.

The sell off in commodities hit the materials sector, which in turn dragged down the indices. Dow components Exxon, Chevron, Alcoa and DuPont accounted for 40% of the Dow fall alone. Another catalyst for the selling was the fact the US dollar had another stable-to-up day, falling against the yen but rising slightly against the euro and significantly against the pound.

Expectations are that while the US has had Bear and a Fed bail-out, the next market to feel such pressures will be the UK. In the meantime, yen buying and a higher US dollar elsewhere is a double-whammy for the Aussie, which lost over US1c to US$0.9125.

The good news in the financial sector last night was the listing of Visa. The credit card giant was expected to settle its IPO in the US$37-42 range but achieved US$44. On listing the shares immediately shot up 33% to US$57-ish and managed to hold that gain as the rest of the market crumbled. One might be reminded of the similar Blackstone listing - one which occurred just before the credit crunch hit and private equity deals evaporated - and thus one might also wonder at the popularity of a credit card company listing ahead of a likely consumer spending freeze. However, one of the great success stories on Wall Street these last two years has been that of rival Mastercard, which listed under US$40 in May 2006 and closed last night at US$208, having fallen only slightly (in a relative sense) from its 2007 high of US$227.

The other good news on Wall Street last night related to housing. There have been strong cries across the market that the government should stymie the housing crisis once and for all by jumping straight in and buying distressed prime mortgages. These cries have been met with visceral criticism from others who bemoan the socialising of the market. However, the government did reach a compromise last night by reducing the capital ratio requirement of the government sponsored mortgage lenders from 30% to 20%.

The result is a fresh US$2bn-odd of capital that can be used to buy mortgages. Throughout the credit crunch the Fed has been slashing the cash rate, but despite an initial drop, the 30-year mortgage rate began to rise again in 2008 as banks simply refused to lend money to mortgage securitisation, no matter how AAA, prime, safe-as-houses those mortgages were. This has meant that while the Fed has saved first the commercial banks, and now the investment banks, it has been incapable of actually getting any relief at all to the source of the problem in the first place - the housing market.

This news sent the Fannies and Freddies of the world shooting up 10-15% last night, and provided yet another element to the relief package being worked through between the Fed, the Treasury and the regulators. However, it could not save Wall Street, which still needs to go through the deleveraging process.

FNArena has suggested, right from the beginning of this crisis, that the crisis will not end until all the leverage is out of the market. Or at least back to the manageable levels of yesteryear. From margin lending in stocks, to margined mortgage securities, and now to margined speculative commodity funds, that process is still its way working through. Traders have spent the last several months switching between bonds and equities, between failing sectors (financials) and safe sectors (tech), and between traditional investments and new kids on the block (commodity funds). Then they have switched back again. Deleveraging means taking overblown valuation out of all markets.

The bad news is it takes the prices of all markets down. The good news is it ultimately takes prices down to where they are cheap.

The SPI Overnight closed down 100 points.

In keeping with the pagan origins of the Easter period, Wall Street will see quadruple witching tonight, meaning quarterly stock options, index options, stock futures options and index futures options all expire, in what could be a fun session.

A reminder that the US does not celebrate Easter Monday, so there will be an Overnight Report for both tonight's trading and Monday's trading before Tuesday morning. As to when exactly depends on whether I can squeeze in some kind of break. Happy Easter to all our readers.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Wall Street Agonises Over Whales And Cockroaches

By Greg Peel

Do not underestimate, say the wise heads on Wall Street, the monumental nature of the Fed's actions over the past few days. In invoking an obscure clause in its charter, unused since 1932, it has signalled to the market it is prepared to put its own balance sheet behind the US financial system in order to restore confidence.

In so doing, the Fed has not "bailed out" Bear Stearns, supporters are quick to point out, and not taken the "moral hazard" to new levels at the expense of the American taxpayer. Bear Stearns has effectively gone under, given its US$2 offer from JP Morgan which values the firm at US$236m against one analyst's quick calculation that its businesses if operable are worth US$7.7bn. Thousands of employees will lose their jobs and most were shareholders. Management, as individuals, have been financially wiped out.

That Bear could capitulate to a US$2 offer speaks volumes about the extent of toxic waste which must lie on its balance sheet - positions that were 30x leveraged, that sparked a run on Bear liquidity and, most importantly, a crisis of confidence around the world. It is this crisis of confidence that the Fed needed to address as swiftly and definitively as possible, for no longer was it a story of earnings potential or even available funds - it was a story of potentially destructive panic wrought by simple human emotion.

The Fed elected to throw its support behind JP Morgan - a commercial bank large enough to resolve the situation. The Fed provided backstop liquidity to Bear via JPM as the latter worked furiously over the weekend to come up with a package. That package ultimately is a big win for JPM, as not only has it picked up Bear (yet to be finalised, but not expected to be countered) for US$2, including its valuable brokerage and clearing operation, it has been given a guarantee by the Fed for US$30bn to cover "Level 3" assets - those assets which do not trade often enough to determine a market value, such as CDOs. It has further been granted indemnity from any class action that may be taken against the former Bear Stearns.

JP Morgan shares rose 10% last night.

The Dow closed up 21 points. It had opened down 195 points on the bell as the market's initial reaction was more doomsday than rescue. From there it rallied back into the green briefly before collapsing again. It turned positive once more and this time surged forward to be up 125 points. Finally it lost momentum toward the close.

The Dow's was the only positive result of the three majors. It was supported by component JP Morgan. In the broader market it was a case of more weakness in the greater financial sector. The S&P500 closed down 0.9%. Tech stocks were turned into cash as the Nasdaq fell 1.6%.

Financial sector panic was no more evident than in the day's trading of Lehman Bros. Lehman is another investment bank which specialises in mortgage securities, and despite being due to release its earnings tonight it lost 48% of its value at one point in the session, before recovering to be down 20%. Lehman was last night a bellwether of whether Bear Stearns would prove to be the whale that signals the bottom of the market, or the cockroach that indicates there is more trouble elsewhere.

Similar volatility was seen in other investment banking stocks, with Merrill Lynch down 5%, Morgan Stanley down 8%, Goldman Sachs down 4% and Citigroup down 6%.

While half of the market was in panic mode, the other half was noting bottoming signals. The VIX volatility index shot back above 30%, which is as high as it usually reaches and indicates a peak in the panic. Many stocks on the NYSE established new lows in the session, another occurrence that usually precedes a rally. And the Dow did actually close in positive territory - a good sign. Although we have had many a false dawn before now.

Lost in all the Bear Sterns mayhem has been the fact that one of the biggest IPOs the market has ever seen will list tonight - that of Visa. Traders will be watching closely to see whether this listing will be well supported, particularly given many missed out on what proved to be a very successful listing of Mastercard in 2006.

In the meantime, last night was all about a dash to cash. It was a time to deliver everything and restock the coffers for what could be another wave of disaster in the liquidity crisis or what could be an opportunity to pick up some shattered stock names cheaply. The victim last night was commodities. This was a bubble waiting to burst anyway, and clearly many speculators have been directing their leveraged funds towards this market while other markets have wavered, given the falling dollar and inflation fears.

Gold actually closed up US$2.50 from Friday's close to US$1005/oz. However, this belies a big sell-off in the New York session following an earlier rise as high as US$1028/oz in Asia yesterday.

Oil fell US$4.53 to US$105.68/bbl. Oil had earlier touched US$114/bbl.

Across the board, commodity prices fell for everything from platinum to grains and coffee. Many moves were substantial.

Base metal markets in London were similarly hit. Nickel fell 9.7% in the late London session. Aluminium was down 4.5%, copper 4%, and zinc and lead 5%.

Commodities markets were not assisted by economic data released last night. US industrial production fell 0.5% in January against a 0.1% expected fall. The Empire State (NY) manufacturing index fell to -22.23 in February from -11.72 in January. A figure of only -6.3 had been expected.

The global financial markets are now in a rush to deleverage. Bear Stearns has shown just what can happen if you find yourself overextended. Everyone is trying to get out at the same time. There was a familiar flight to quality, as the US two-year bond yield fell 14bps to 1.35% and the ten-year 14bps to 3.30%. The market expects the Fed to cut the cash rate tonight by 100bps.

Yen carry trade unwinding is part of that deleveraging process. As the US dollar fell to 97.35 yen over yesterday and last night, the Aussie fell US1.7c to US$0.9202.

Such a Fed cut will be another piece of the rescue package, and cement the view that the Fed has stepped up to a new level of pro-action. While all around are bringing cash back onto balance sheets, the share market is indicating a possible return to confidence. Deleveraging has already largely occurred in the share market, as share prices have been decimated by ongoing margin calls.

There was also a slight easing of credit spreads last night, which is also a good sign. Wall Street is heartened that the Fed has now moved away from its concentration on trying to reinvigorate the market via the commercial banks alone. It has effectively taken investment banks into its domain and granted them commercial bank status. The question now is to as whether the plan will work.

In the meantime, Congress will be working furiously on tightening up derivatives market regulations and mandatory capital requirements. But this will take time, and is still a case of shutting the gate after the horse. What will emerge from the dust, however, will be a very different US investment banking system.

Whatever happens, there is currently still no end in sight for the US housing crisis, which is at the heart of the entire global credit collapse. Until the Fed's actions are backed up by some equally extraordinary fiscal measures from the government in an attempt to save mortgages, then the problem has not gone away.

So it is a case of pure confusion and uncertainty. Some are calling Bears Stearns the whale which will ultimately mark the beginning of the end of the credit crisis. Others are terrified Bear is only the cockroach which appeared from under the fridge. Shift the fridge, and a whole lot more cockroaches will go running. In which case it may yet be another beginning.

The SPI Overnight was up 4 points.

article 3 months old

Oil Expected To Stay Over US$100

By Chris Shaw

In what was a timely move given the current state of commodity markets Barclays Capital held its fourth annual Commodity Investors Conference last week, with surveys of the investors in attendance offering some insights into expectations for the various commodity markets.

One conclusion from the conference is volatility in commodity markets is set to increase as a majority of investors indicated they would be likely to move beyond simple index exposure to the adoption of more active management strategies going forward, more than 60% of attendees intending to either combine passive and active strategies or adopt totally active strategies.

Interest in new markets and products is also high judging by the responses of those at the conference, particularly as it relates to investment in products linked to climate change. For many respondents this means gaining exposure to emissions markets as this is seen as a growth area with significant potential, with 40% intending to do so via direct exposure to alternative energy equities and 36% seeing carbon emissions trading as the preferred method of gaining leverage to the climate change market.

In terms of where money is likely to be made in coming months Barclays notes more than half (53%) of those at the conference saw agricultural commodities as offering the best returns among the various commodity markets in 2008, which fits in with the current conditions as traditionally during periods when global recession is a concern it is the agricultural and precious metal markets that tend to outperform the energy and base metal sectors given the latter two are more closely linked to the economic cycle.

As Barclays points out the current cycle is somewhat different given there are binding supply constraints throughout the supply chain at the same time as there is strong demand from emerging nations such as China and India, meaning base metal and energy prices have gone against history somewhat in terms of recent performance.

Concerns over the global growth outlook have not prevented an overall bullish outlook on oil prices being formed as Barclays notes a majority of those in attendance expect the oil price to average more than US$100 per barrel over the next five years.
article 3 months old

Incitec Bid For Dyno Nobel Seen As A Win-Win

By Chris Shaw

Since it took a 13% stake in Dyno Nobel ((DXL)) the market considered it a matter of time before Incitec Pivot ((IPL)) made a full bid for the company and yesterday these expectations were met as the company launched a scrip and cash offer valuing Dyno Nobel at $2.80 based on Incitec's pre-bid share price.

With Incitec indicating the deal would be as much as 10% earnings accretive in year two most in the market are positive on the bid, Citi suggesting it will be a win-win outcome for both parties while conceding the issues surrounding Dyno's Moranbah ammonium nitrate project mean the price being paid is a full one.

On the plus side for the deal the broker notes the fact it is a combined cash and scrip offer means Incitec retains enough balance sheet flexibility to pursue additional growth options, which is a particular positive given the current tough credit environment.

JP Morgan likes the deal as it would provide Incitec with a more reliable and less risky earnings platform though it notes the key elements of the deal will be the synergies and benefits it delivers, which together could total as much as $100 million on the broker's estimates.

UBS points out the Moranbah project means there is as much as $200 million in value that may or may not be realisable, so Incitec's ability to generate anything out of this will impact on the returns the company achieves. Citi agrees and notes the company has based its bid on the notion the project carries a negative $200 million impact on Net present Value (NPV), though it will proceed with the project if it can be shown to make financial sense.

For Deutsche Bank one positive in the deal is the scrip component allows Incitec to take advantage of its elevated share price, but the broker estimates the return on capital will only be 8.9% and this is well below its stated target of 18%. With Incitec shares trading at a significant premium to its global peers the bid has not encouraged the broker to shift from its Sell rating.

Deutsche is the only broker in the FNArena database with such a rating, compared with two Buys and three Hold recommendations. One of the Holds comes from JP Morgan, who suggests the recent share price weakness may present an entry opportunity though on valuation grounds it sees its rating as appropriate. The broker also suggests Dyno Nobel shareholders should take advantage of the price strength resulting from the bid and take some profits at current levels.

Merrill Lynch sees little chance of a higher offer emerging but continues to rate Dyno Nobel as a Buy, as do ABN Amro and Credit Suisse, though neither broker has yet updated its rating since the bid was announced. The stock also scores six Hold recommendations.

Factoring in the terms of the bid the database shows the average price target for Dyno Nobel has increased to $2.53 from $2.44 previously, while Incitec's average price target has come down slightly to $154.20 from $160.78 previously with Deutsche remaining way below market with its $85.00 target.

Shares in Incitec have strengthened today in line with the stronger overall market and as at 1.05pm were up $5.15 or 3.9% at $136.09, while Dyno Nobel shares were trading 2c higher at $2.51.
article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Fear Grips The Street

By Greg Peel

The US went on to summer time on the weekend, which means the NYSE now closes at 7am Sydney time. At the end of this month we go off summer time, at which point the Dow will close at 6am Sydney time.

Last night the Dow fell 153 points, or 1.3%, to 11,731. The S&P fell 1.6% and the Nasdaq 2%. It was not a rollercoaster of bad news and good - it was simply a steady decline on increasing fear and uncertainty.

The economic data for the session were actually positive. Wholesale inventories rose a more than expected 0.8% in January, suggesting that despite recession fears the wholesalers are buying in stock. One could suggest this seems foolish, accept that wholesale sales in January rose by a surprising 2.7%, which is the biggest rise since March 2004. Is this a bucking of the sentiment trend, or will it be retailers who get caught?

But that was about it for anything positive. Blackstone Group - the private equity firm which "rang the bell" at the top of the market last year when it listed at a ridiculous premium just before Bear Stearns announced problems at two of its hedge funds - posted a fourth quarter loss and a big write-down due to the credit market in general and a stake in a bond insurer in particular. Nevertheless, the market was not expecting anything different, and the shares actually managed to rise.

The real concern came from the aforementioned Bear Stearns. As Moody's moved to downgrade several tranches of Alt-A mortgage securities issued by the brokerage firm, rumours grew that Bear Stearns was having liquidity difficulties. While management denied the claims, the mechanics of what was being suggested were hard to deny. It started with Thornburg Mortgage last week.

Thornburg was last week unable to meet its margin calls, and candidly suggested it was struggling to remain a growing concern. Banks are increasing margins, imposing stricter lending standards and raising borrowing rates. The next step down the chain from the mortgage lenders is the brokerages, who find themselves in a similar position with margin calls. This has forced the swift sale of assets, many of which can find little buying interest. Brokers and banks are together squeezing hedge funds, another step in the chain. The market is de-leveraging as it must, but on to whom does it unload the risk? Asset prices can only go lower.

Shares in bear Stearns fell 11% last night, and the rest of the brokerage and banking sectors were dragged along with it. Right from the outset, there has been a belief the credit crunch will produce a "whale" - a big brokerage or bank that will hit the wall. There have been various victims to date, some very near victims, and other victims being rescued as we speak. But Wall Street is now really beginning to fear the big one. To put things into perspective, last week a credit default swap on Bear Stearns was trading at 400 points over Treasury. Last night that blew out to 610 points.

It didn't helped last night that FBI agents moved into the offices of major subprime lender Countrywide following allegations of fraud. Or that Thornburg was further downgraded by brokers.

It made no difference either that McDonalds posted strong February sales. Such news is hardly counter-recessionary, given McDonalds is a "staple" for Americans and that increased sales are probably offset at other establishments selling actual food.

Expectation is building that the Fed will have to step in with another emergency rate cut ahead of the March 18 meeting, just as it did in January. The market is factoring in a 75 point cut. Whether this will affect any sustainable bounce in stock prices is debatable, as it is now recognised that nothing the Fed is doing is helping. There is not a lot in the way of important data due out in the US until Friday, when the February CPI is released. The CPI may yet force the Fed to think twice. For the oil price hit US$108/bbl last night.

Back in 2006, when oil was scaring everyone by rising into the US$50-60 zone, analysts at Goldman Sachs released a report suggesting oil could go to US$105/bbl. It seemed a bit far-fetched at the time. Well, on Friday the Goldmans analysts were back, both with an "I told you so" and a new target. If there is any sort of supply disruption ahead, said Goldmans, oil will go to US$150-200. That was enough to send the price up over US$108 last night, before it settled at US$107.90/bbl, up US$2.75.

As a commodity however, oil was a loner last night. Elsewhere commodity prices fell as the US dollar was mixed and general recession fears gained more momentum. Funds have stepped aside, and opened up a hole under recent commodity price levels. Softs all fell, and base metals dropped an average of 3% in late London trade. Gold fell US$1.70 to US$971.60/oz.

The Aussie dollar has finished down more than a US cent to US$0.9164 from Friday's close to this morning.

The SPI Overnight fell 82 points. The close yesterday at 5180 in the ASX 200 put it just below the January 22 close - the day the market fell 7% - of 5186 (which was also the intra-day low). You have to go back to September 2006 to find the last time The ASX 200 did some work at 5000 before commencing its push to 6851 in November 2007. If it falls to 5100 today, that's a fall of over 25% from the high.

article 3 months old

Commodity Stock Underperformance

By Greg Peel

As we are all now fully aware, global commodity prices have been going through the roof in 2008, prompting comparisons with the high inflation era of the 1970s. This is how soft commodities compare:

Hard commodities are also rampant, with the oil price now above its real 1970s price and coal looking at making a price jump this year of at least 100%.

While there has been value gained in riding the soft commodity boom in some stocks, such as leading global fertiliser producer Incitec Pivot ((IPL))...

...it hasn't been the same story for the world's hard commodity producers. As the analysts at GaveKal note, diversified miner/oil producer BHP Billiton ((BHP)) is down 2.8% year to date, while its diversified miner target Rio Tinto is down 0.1%. Among the big oil producers, America's Exxon is down 6.9%, China's PetroChina is down 22% (it was recently listed on the NYSE) and France's Total is down 12.6%.

What does an investor have to do to make money out of this boom?

One of the problems for the traditional share market investor has been the competitive rise of the exchange-traded fund (ETF). Miners and drillers might have significant leverage to commodity prices, but they are also exposed to the problems and costs of actually trying to get the stuff out of the ground/sea and on to market. The rapid growth of ETFs have allowed investors, particularly in the US, to invest directly in the commodities themselves. Trading ETFs is just like trading shares (without the dividends) as the investor owns a financial instrument the price of which is directly tied to a commodity price, or perhaps to a basket of commodities or recognised commodity index. Previously an investor would either have to buy and store an actual commodity, or trade via the volatile and risky futures markets.

ETFs are thus in direct competition to mining stocks as a means of exposure to the commodity boom. There has been a surge in fund manager activity in these instruments in recent years as both an investment and a direct hedge against inflation (and if you're American, an even more direct counter to the falling US dollar). No more being disappointed by production delays and infrastructure constraints at your average mine. In fact, such impediments become ETF price drivers.

Another reason commodity producers shares have underperformed is as an indirect result of the credit crunch. While this has impacted on highly geared and speculative stocks directly, the big cash flow giants such as your BHPs have been hit by the wave of forced selling along with the rest of the market. Even the gold price can suffer heavy falls in contradiction to increased risk in the equity market, given margin-called stockholders are forced to sell whatever assets they have to raise cash. So if you're underwater on, say, your financial sector investments, and your broker is at the door, you have no choice but to dump even your prized investments.

Another reason the producers have underperformed goes back to point one - those costs. Shortages of equipment and skilled labour have forced costs through the roof as well, along with price increases in water and electricity.  There is a Catch-22 relationship here, as rising costs of production contribute to higher commodity prices and what we end up with is an upward spiral largely self-driven. But while the direct commodity investor benefits from the commodity price alone the stock investor suffers earnings erosion from those rising costs.

In the case of Australian commodity stock investment, the falling US dollar has helped to push up prices, but the subsequently rising Aussie dollar undermines local earnings and thus share prices.

The other bad news is that there's a grand total of one commodity ETF listed on the ASX - the GOLD fund. To invest in anything else means going offshore and then having to deal with currency risk.

However, GaveKal makes the point that if ever there was a time in history when free cash flow was a most attractive proposition, it's right now amidst the credit crunch. So while the resource sector may have still performed a lot better than other sectors in the stock market, a longer term view is making such stocks must-haves, particularly given their absolute underperformance.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: It Was All Just A Dream

By Greg Peel

Once upon a time, real commodities (as opposed to financial ephemera) used to trade quietly amongst wholesale suppliers and consumers, ticking up and down the odd cent each day. Only a handful of speculators played the market, patiently riding out bigger picture views. Today real commodities are no longer just "stuff", but an asset class all of their own. They have become as much a form of financial ephemera as any stock index or bond spread. Fund trading has taken control of the floor, and the real suppliers/consumers are just periphery.

OPEC recognises this fact. There had been expectation that OPEC would announce an increase in production at its meeting last night, given the price of oil was at US$100/bbl. OPEC, one the other hand, has scoffed at the inflated oil price, suggesting it was a mirage and that real demand was actually falling. OPEC even threatened to cut production. Whatever they might have decided, it is well known that the individual members will pump out as much oil as they can anyway - no matter what the quota - but it is also suspected that collectively OPEC is already running at peak levels, and actually has little scope to raise production even if it wanted to.

Last night OPEC decided to leave its production level where it was. At the same time, it was announced US inventories had actually fallen this week after several weeks of continuous increase. Observers have been waiting for the oil price to collapse, given the US slowdown and those rising inventories which point directly to reduced demand. While weekly inventory numbers tend to be fleeting and volatile, the market - now dominated by commodity funds - was not going to argue the toss. Oil rose a full US$5.00 last night to close at US$104.52/bbl. This was the biggest one-day rise since oil futures were listed in 1983. By just about any measure (and there are several) it was a new all-time high in real terms, surpassing the 1980 peak.

Suffice to say, the bout of profit-taking which occurred in commodity markets on Tuesday night was rapidly reversed and it was back to Inflation Central, helped along by renewed weakness in the US dollar. Gold rallied US$24.70 to US$988.70/oz. Silver jumped a remarkable US$1.04, or more than 5%, to US$20.78/oz. Platinum was higher, palladium was higher. Wheat, corn, rice and soybeans were higher.

Base metals exploded back to the upside, having started the session lower. The London official closing prices (which are marked mid-session) showed steep falls, on a catch up from Tuesday's late sell-off and early morning weakness. But the late session, which is best illustrated by the New York prices, saw a big turnaround. Copper, aluminium, zinc and nickel ultimately added around 3% each by the London close.

The Dow finished the day up 41 points, or 0.3%, having first been up 136 and then down 73. The S&P and Nasdaq both closed 0.5% higher.

The early strength in the Dow was a result of some not-quite-so-bad economic data. The Fed Beige Book - an anecdotal assessment of twelve separate economic regions - revealed two-thirds of the regions were experiencing a "weakening pace of business activity", while the other third was experiencing "subdued, slow, or modest growth". This was hardly a shock, but while indicative of weakness Wall Street seized on the fact that not one region was actually receding.

They also seized on the fact the ISM non-manufacturing index (about 85% of the wholesale economy) posted a 49.3 in February, bouncing back from the market-shattering January number of 44.6. It was a better than expected result, and a fillip for stock market gains. A 2.5% reduction in factory orders was overlooked, as was the ADP employment number which, when extrapolated, suggested only 2,000 jobs were added in February compared to the market's expectation of 20,000.

The ADP number can end up being vastly different to the government's number, which is released on Friday.

But the strength in the market was sapped at lunch time when monoline insurer Ambac announced a US$1.5bn issue of new capital. A consortium of banks has been working to save Ambac's AAA rating, which basically means propping up capital. This was the best they could do? Where were the sovereign funds, the billionaire white nights, the heroes come to save the day? By throwing it out to the market - an offer of picking up diluted capital in a distressed company which is still teetering on the brink - the consortium dumfounded Wall Street and the financial sector was rapidly sold off.

However, it emerged in the fine detail that US$1bn of the issue was in ordinary shares, which have been fully underwritten by said banks and, supposedly, already subscribed. The other US$500m was in convertibles, and said banks have themselves bought another US$500m. Weighing it up, Wall Street decided it wasn't quite as bad as it looked, and so the market recovered.

The US dollar fell to new lows against the euro, however, although it did post a bit of a rally against the yen. This allowed the Aussie to bounce, rising back a half cent to US$0.9325. The US bond market went back into inflation mode, as after another choppy day following the fortunes of the Dow the two-year closed unchanged at 1.65%, but the ten-year added 9bps to 3.70%. The curve continues to steepen.

The SPI Overnight added 57 points as it charged to a close. This is the second night in a row the SPI-O has moved in points terms more than the much higher-indexed Dow. Yesterday it was down 46 but the ASX 200 opened up about 75 before giving it all back. The Ausralian market is currently very volatile.

article 3 months old

US Dollar – Commodity Price Relationship Still The Strongest

By Chris Shaw

As commodity prices have enjoyed rapid gains in recent weeks attention has turned to whether or not the price moves are a reflection of stronger demand or weakness in the US dollar, which would imply a re-pricing of commodity costs into other currencies.

To attempt to determine whether the gains are demand or currency related Silicon Valley Bank senior advisor Laurence Hayward has completed an analysis factoring in the US dollar and five other currencies - the euro, the British pound, the Canadian and Australian dollars and the yen, along with five commodities - gold, oil, natural gas, wheat and corn.

The result of Hayward's analysis done on prices from the end of September to the end of February is as currencies strengthen agains the US dollar so too do commodity prices, but also evident is the fact the increases in percentage terms in commodity prices were significantly larger than were the movements in currencies.

As evidence of this Hayward notes currency movements in the period ranged from a gain of around 5% for the Australian dollar to near 10% for the yen, but the Commodity Research Bureau Index rose more than 23% during the same period.

Hayward argues this supports the conclusion while commodity costs in non-US dollar terms have increased the changes have not been to the same extent as the changes in US dollar terms, meaning while there is a directional relationship between commodity prices and currencies there is no evidence of a de-coupling of commodity costs away from US dollars.
article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Commodities Blow Off, Dow Bungie-Jumps

By Greg Peel

Last night the Dow closed at 12,213, down 45 points or 0.4%. At its low point it was down 226 points to 12,032. The post-subprime low close in the Dow is 11,971, posted on January 22. The intra-day low was 11,508, posted in the blink of an eye that morning when Wall Street came back from a long weekend to find Europe had collapsed (which later turned out to be due to SocGen's rogue problem). The Fed made its historic 75bps emergency cut that morning and the Dow came back from oblivion.

Last night the S&P 500 closed at 1326, down 5 or 0.3%. At its low point it was down 24 points to 1307, which is below the January 22 low of 1310. As the S&P is the broad market index, its movement has more currency as a stock market indicator than the 30-stock Dow. Thus the January low was breached. The similar blink-of-an-eye intra-day low was 1270.

Last night the Nasdaq closed at 2260, up 2 points or 0.07%. The January 22 close in the Nasdaq was 2292, so that level has already been breached, and indeed was breached on February 29.

Wall Street began to turn around after 2pm when the New York State Regulator announced the rescue deal for monoline insurer Ambac was "progressing". A consortium of banks has come together to restructure and recapitalise Ambac in order to save its AAA rating. Its first rescue package was rejected by the ratings agencies. There is no guarantee this second one won't be either, but Wall Street wasn't taking any chances. The turnaround gained extra encouragement, particularly in the Nasdaq, when the CEOs of Cisco and Amazon both independently came out with positive views on their businesses.

So why did Wall Street bounce? The answer lies in the speculative side of the market. Speculators are short, short, short. The open interest in index put options is currently off the dial. It has been a common theme that the stock market needed to retest the January lows. On the S&P move last night it did. What would it do next? Collapse or bounce?

As it was, it bounced on the above news. Technical levels are all well and good, but anyone with a coin has as much chance of finding them useful. The ASX 200 bounced several times off 5500 before gapping through. Support levels can be made of concrete one day and paper the next. The shorts responded specifically to the Ambac news, and staged a typical get-me-out rally as everyone else moved to the back of the room.

The reason the Dow was so weak earlier in the session was once again due to the financial sector. Firstly, Merrill Lynch analysts reduced their earnings forecast for Citigroup, suggesting the bank would write down yet another US$18bn of mortgage-related valuations in the first quarter. Citi is not finding this stuff under the rug. It is marking to market as required and the fact is the mortgage market is now worse than it was last year despite anything the Fed has thrown at it. The Fed cash rate is 3% and quickly heading to 2%. The 30-year mortgage rate for jumbo (specifically +US$417,000) loans is 6.82% and rising. Defaults are on the increase despite attempts by the government to promote mortgage relief.

In fact, so bad has the situation become that Fed chairman Ben Bernanke last night pleaded with banks to resolve the crisis by actually reducing the level of principal owed on mortgages. In other words, Ben wants the banks to effectively forgive part of a mortgage. Is he kidding? Not at all. With any equity in their houses totally blown away US home owners are simply walking away from their properties. The bank then has to sell that property at possibly 50% of its loan value. Were the loan value to be reduced, the home owner could continue to service the loan into the future and, eventually, the market would recover. Banks would ultimately stand to lose at lot less.

It was a daring appeal, and seemed like a panicked one. Back at Citigroup, management was busy denying a specific statement by its Dubai investors that the bank would need to raise yet more capital. Citigroup's shares are now at a nine-year low. The S&P Financial Index has breached its January low.

While it was a rollercoaster ride on the stock market, the bond market did not take to the sidelines. The two-year traded as low as 1.5% when the Dow was at its nadir (money flowing out of stocks will usually first flow into bonds). The last time the two-year was at 1.5% was in 2004 when the Fed funds rate was 1%. Last night it bounced hard with the stocks, closing back at 1.64%. But this hasn't stopped bond traders predicting the Fed will shortly make an emergency cut of 50bps ahead of the March 18 official meeting, at which it will make another 50bps cut. That would take the nominal cash rate to 2%, and the real rate well into the negative.

But now to commodities. It's always hard to know who was leading whom, but last night but Dow weakness was exacerbated by a sudden turnaround in across the board commodity prices. Yes - the inevitable happened as the recent parabolic trajectories of commodity prices reached a peak. Profit-takers moved in, and moved in fast.

In the last few weeks observers have suggested commodity prices had completely disconnected with fundamental demand/supply influences and become nothing more than speculative. Fund managers were rushing into commodities as an alternative asset class, as talk of spiralling inflation inspired funds to get on board the train rather than be run over by it. This, of course, is self-fulfilling and can only last so long. The reality is a good, sharp pullback in commodities is very healthy, and if it continues it should ultimately allow investors to re-establish positions for the bigger picture advance expected over a longer time horizon.

Oil fell US$2.93 to US$99.52/bbl. Aluminium fell 1%, copper, lead, tin and nickel fell 2-3%, and zinc fell over 3%. Upcoming option expiries was another reason for base metal traders to square up. Grains and beans fell. Silver fell close to 3%. Even platinum fell.

Gold is called a commodity, but its' not - it's a currency. Nevertheless, with the US dollar relatively steady last night and oil dropping, gold traders decided they wouldn't wait for US$1000 to start cashing in. Gold fell US$20.40 to US$963.70/oz.

The Aussie dollar was in a mind of its own however, having dropped like a stone on the RBA statement accompanying the rate rise yesterday. Economists agree RBA rhetoric now signals a pause at 7.25% when previously another 25bps hike was expected in May. Over 24 hours, the Aussie fell over US1c to US$0.9273.

The SPI Overnight fell another 46 points.

Last night's various pieces of news just go to prove this is not over yet. However, there is a prevailing view of exactly that now on Wall Street. While the longer term players are still touting the value in so many stocks, and have been since about August, the short term players have been playing the short side, trying to push the market as well as ride the market to lower levels that really will offer good buying value. When the first speculators begin to feel enough is enough, this market will turn. But it won't happen tomorrow, and may not happen this month. A large majority are signalling mid-year as a potential bottom, which means it is likely a bottom will be formed before then, if  bottom is going to be formed.

Buy in May and go away?