Tag Archives: Banks

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

The final week of reporting season for Australian equities has again seen downgrades from brokers in the FNArena database outweigh upgrades, this time by a score of 35 to 17. The ratings changes have brought total Buy ratings to 51.45%, down from 52.15% last week.

Among the companies to receive more than one upgrade were James Hardie ((JHX)) and QBE Insurance ((QBE)). Upgrades for the former came from UBS and Credit Suisse, both moving to Neutral recommendations from Sell previously.

The changes followed a 3Q result that gave some cause for optimism the worst may be behind the company, particularly with the prospect of additional capital management initiatives going forward. At the same time Macquarie downgraded to a Neutral recommendation from Outperform on valuation grounds.

More positive were the upgrades for QBE as Citi, BA-Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan and UBS all moved to Buy ratings from Neutral previously. The changes reflect a combination of factors, including value in the stock at current levels, better understanding of the company's margin outlook post its recent result and a more positive stance on general insurance stocks in general.

Among the other upgrades where brokers moved to Buy views were Aston Resources ((AZT)), Macquarie seeing some upside from the proposal for 10% of the group's stake in the Maules Creek project to be sold.

Deutsche Bank upgraded CSL ((CSL)) to a Buy from Neutral given its view the company should continue to enjoy margin expansion in coming years, while Citi has turned more positive on Insurance Australia Group ((IAG)) also in part due to an improved margin outlook.

Jetset Travelworld ((JET)) offers potential for a re-rating over the next 12 months according to Deutsche and this was enough to prompt an upgrade to Buy, while RBS Australia made the same change with Prime Television ((PRT)) given a somewhat more positive outlook and the potential for some corporate activity involving the company.

For Deutsche the potential for grade and production expansion is enough to justify upgrading to a Buy on Regis Resources ((RRL)), though at the same time UBS has downgraded to a Neutral rating on the stock on valuation grounds.

ResMed ((RMD)) offers scope for an increased buyback boosting earnings per share, which sees Credit Suisse lift its valuation and move to a Buy rating. It was a similar story for Seven Group ((SVW)), as BA-ML no longer sees working capital as an issue and expects valuation support from the group's media assets.

Warrnambool Cheese and Butter ((WCB)) was upgraded to a Buy by RBS following a stronger than expected profit result that implies good value at current levels, while JP Morgan upgraded Westpac ((WBC)) on relative valuation grounds following what appears to be excessive underperformance relative to ANZ Bank ((ANZ)). The broker downgraded ANZ to a Sell at the same time.

On the downgrades side, those receiving multiple cuts to ratings were Aristocrat Leisure ((ALL)), Australian Worldwide Exploration ((AWE)), Harvey Norman ((HVN)) and Newcrest Mining ((NCM)).

For Aristocrat, the downgrades were a factor of valuation after recent share price gains, as full year earnings were generally better than expected and prompted increases to earnings estimates and price targets.

UBS and Deutsche both moved to Neutral ratings on AWE from previous Buy ratings, again valuation calls following recent share price gains. Harvey Norman continues to deal with poor retail conditions and brokers now see additional pressure on franchise margins, which was enough for Macquarie and BA-ML to downgrade to Sell ratings from Hold previously. 

Newcrest also has some issues as Lihir is again proving a problematic asset, enough that full year production expectations have been revised lower. The changes saw JP Morgan and UBS downgrade to Neutral views as shorter-term outperformance now appears less likely.

The other most significant downgrade this week came courtesy of Macquarie, the broker moving to a Sell on Air New Zealand ((AIZ)) from a Buy previously. The change in view reflects still tough operating conditions given a combination of weaker long haul demand and increases to operating costs.

In terms of changes to price targets, the largest increases were in Seven Group, Aristocrat and Ausdrill ((ASL)), the latter on the back of a better than expected interim result. Price target cuts were most significant for Jetset, as brokers adjusted for lower than expected interim earnings.

 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 ABACUS PROPERTY GROUP Sell Neutral JP Morgan
2 ASTON RESOURCES LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
3 CSL LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
4 INSURANCE AUSTRALIA GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy Citi
5 JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. Sell Neutral UBS
6 JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. Sell Neutral Credit Suisse
7 JETSET TRAVELWORLD LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
8 PRIME TELEVISION LIMITED Neutral Buy RBS Australia
9 QBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy Citi
10 QBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy BA-Merrill Lynch
11 QBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy JP Morgan
12 QBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy UBS
13 REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
14 RESMED INC Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
15 SEVEN GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Buy BA-Merrill Lynch
16 WARRNAMBOOL CHEESE AND BUTTER FACTORY COMPANY HOLDING LTD Neutral Buy RBS Australia
17 WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION Neutral Buy JP Morgan
Downgrade
18 AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Buy Sell Macquarie
19 ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED Neutral Sell Macquarie
20 ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED Buy Buy Citi
21 ARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITED Neutral Sell Deutsche Bank
22 ASG GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
23 AUSDRILL LIMITED Buy Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
24 AUSTAL LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
25 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP Neutral Sell JP Morgan
26 AUSTRALIAN WORLDWIDE EXPLORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
27 AUSTRALIAN WORLDWIDE EXPLORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
28 BEACH PETROLEUM LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
29 BRAVURA SOLUTIONS LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
30 CLARIUS GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
31 CROWN LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
32 ECHO ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
33 GLOUCESTER COAL LTD Buy Neutral RBS Australia
34 GRANGE RESOURCES LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
35 HARVEY NORMAN HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Sell Macquarie
36 HARVEY NORMAN HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
37 HENDERSON GROUP PLC. Buy Neutral Citi
38 HUTCHISON TELECOMMUNICATIONS (AUST) LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
39 JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. Buy Neutral Macquarie
40 LINDSAY AUSTRALIA LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
41 MACQUARIE ATLAS ROADS GROUP Buy Neutral Macquarie
42 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
43 NEW HOPE CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
44 NEWCREST MINING LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
45 NEWCREST MINING LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
46 PREMIER INVESTMENTS LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
47 REGIONAL EXPRESS HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
48 REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
49 RETAIL FOOD GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
50 TAP OIL LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
51 TELECOM CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
52 THORN GROUP LIMITED Buy Buy RBS Australia
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 QBE 13.0% 63.0% 50.0% 8
2 SYD - 25.0% 17.0% 42.0% 6
3 SVW 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 4
4 JET 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 4
5 AZT 80.0% 100.0% 20.0% 5
6 PRT 33.0% 50.0% 17.0% 6
7 SUL 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
8 RMD 50.0% 63.0% 13.0% 8
9 WBC 38.0% 50.0% 12.0% 8
10 CSL 63.0% 75.0% 12.0% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 AIZ 100.0% 50.0% - 50.0% 4
2 RHC 25.0% - 13.0% - 38.0% 8
3 TTS 13.0% - 25.0% - 38.0% 8
4 NHC 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 3
5 ENV 17.0% - 17.0% - 34.0% 6
6 RFG 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 3
7 AWE 71.0% 43.0% - 28.0% 7
8 TAP 75.0% 50.0% - 25.0% 4
9 ALL 38.0% 13.0% - 25.0% 8
10 NCM 100.0% 75.0% - 25.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 SVW 9.423 10.925 15.94% 4
2 ALL 2.656 2.989 12.54% 8
3 ASL 4.018 4.456 10.90% 5
4 TOL 5.436 5.783 6.38% 8
5 PRT 0.760 0.807 6.18% 6
6 TPI 0.878 0.923 5.13% 6
7 RSG 1.750 1.833 4.74% 3
8 AWE 1.961 2.050 4.54% 7
9 IAG 3.368 3.499 3.89% 8
10 ENV 0.763 0.792 3.80% 6

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 JET 0.988 0.890 - 9.92% 4
2 FKP 0.798 0.760 - 4.76% 6
3 GCL 9.618 9.225 - 4.09% 5
4 RFG 3.017 2.917 - 3.31% 3
5 ILU 21.074 20.569 - 2.40% 8
6 NCM 42.969 41.965 - 2.34% 8
7 CWN 10.150 9.944 - 2.03% 8
8 DJS 2.656 2.605 - 1.92% 8
9 NHC 6.073 6.017 - 0.92% 3
10 TAP 1.085 1.075 - 0.92% 4
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 CHC 17.800 22.417 25.94% 6
2 NWH 30.300 33.600 10.89% 4
3 SKI 12.600 13.938 10.62% 8
4 ASL 33.440 36.880 10.29% 5
5 PAN 4.700 5.050 7.45% 4
6 TAP 3.075 3.300 7.32% 4
7 ENV 4.083 4.367 6.96% 6
8 SVW 82.180 87.780 6.81% 4
9 IAG 22.013 23.450 6.53% 8
10 VBA 2.914 3.086 5.90% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 GCL 5.480 - 22.520 - 510.95% 5
2 AGO 20.726 7.300 - 64.78% 8
3 AIZ 6.579 3.245 - 50.68% 4
4 QUB 14.075 7.600 - 46.00% 4
5 IGO 6.020 4.080 - 32.23% 5
6 ROC 6.532 4.716 - 27.80% 5
7 FKP 10.450 8.483 - 18.82% 6
8 HZN 1.365 1.148 - 15.90% 4
9 ILU 290.388 248.038 - 14.58% 8
10 FXJ 10.600 9.163 - 13.56% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

The week from February 14 was relatively quiet in terms of significant changes in short positions, only 10 stocks experiencing changes in total short positions of more than one percentage point.

Among the increases the largest was in Wesfarmers ((WESN)), where total positions increased from 0.04% to 2.44%. At the same time shorts in the ordinary shares of Wesfarmers also rose to 3.39% from 2.86% previously, this following an interim earnings result that missed on a few key metrics (margins for Coles included).

Shorts continued to rise in Cochlear, hitting 9.59% for the week from February 14 compared to 8.4% the week before, again post what was a solid interim for some in the market but a less positive result in the view of others including UBS given a decline in unit sales.

Little covered Alliance Aviation ((AQZ)) and Tangiers Petroleum ((TPT)) both saw shorts jump from a negligible levels of less than 0.25% the previous week to more than 1.0% respectively, while Paladin ((PDN)) and Iluka ((ILU)) also saw modest increases in total short positions.

In terms of declining short positions, Linc Energy ((LNC)) saw shorts fall from a somewhat significant 5.75% the week before to 2.94% for the week from February 14, while Shorts in Southern Cross Media ((SXL)) declined from 2.3% to 0.44% after the company announced a share buyback with its interim result.

Shorts in Hastings Diversified ((HDF)) fell to 0.41% from 1.88% the previous week as the market adjusts to a proposed acquisition of the company by APA Group ((APA)). The next largest decline in shorts was in Energy World Corporation ((EWC)), where positions in the junior fell to 1.33% from 2.68% the week before.

With respect to monthly changes, the major increases were experienced by Rialto Energy ((RIA)) and Singapore Telecom ((SGT)), increases of more than 5.0 and 3.0 percentage points in each case pushing total shorts to 5.23% and 4.88% respectively.

The major decline over the month from January 20 has been in the iShares Small Ords derivative ((ISO)), where total shorts have fallen to 10.58% from 17.24% previously. From a stock perspective, the major decline was in Bank of Queensland ((BOQ)), shorts falling to 3.28% from just over 5.0% previously.

The changes in positions have not impacted significantly on the top 20 short positions, which continue to be dominated by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the top 20 continue to be JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Myer ((MYR)), David Jones ((DJS)), Billabong ((BBG)), Flight Centre ((FLT)), Harvey Norman ((HVN)), The Reject Shop ((TRS)) and Wotif.com ((WTF)).

Among these companies the pick of the interim results appeared to come from Wotif.com, where headline results were a little better than had been expected. While this was due in part to one-off cost cutting, the result was enough to prompt a solid rally in the share price that may have reflected some covering of short positions.

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 21449536 98840643 21.70
2 MYR 70933745 583384551 12.12
3 FXJ 282570650 2351955725 12.04
4 DJS 58355903 524940325 11.09
5 BBG 28028623 255102103 10.96
6 ISO 571468 5403165 10.58
7 COH 5450536 56902933 9.59
8 FLT 9517934 100009946 9.49
9 LYC 156953209 1714396913 9.15
10 HVN 74774546 1062316784 7.05
11 SEK 23486633 337101307 6.94
12 WTF 14407551 211736244 6.82
13 TRS 1714382 26071170 6.55
14 GNS 53124711 848401559 6.25
15 VLC 10000 160001 6.25
16 OST 80037613 1342393583 5.96
17 CRZ 13890041 233264223 5.94
18 PPT 2284897 41980678 5.43
19 TEN 55392137 1045236720 5.31
20 RIA 22560161 431256264 5.23

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Your Editor On Switzer TV

FNArena editor Rudi Filapek-Vandyck has become a regular guest on Switzer TV this calendar year. Readers and subscribers who don't have an Austar or Foxtel payTV subscription, will be able to watch his appearances via the FNArena Investor Education section on the website.

FNArena has recently added two recent videos. On Thursday last week (Feb 23) Rudi analysed and explained what has been happening to bank stocks since the peak in 2007, the trough in 2009 and the February reporting season. This video can be accessed directly via the following link: https://www.fnarena.com/index2.cfm?type=dsp_front_videos&vid=72

Two weeks earlier, on February 9th, Rudi went on television to explain why investors shouldn't ignore the weather when assessing recent economic data. This video is also available on the FNArena Investor Education section (scroll down). The direct link to this section is: https://www.fnarena.com/index2.cfm?type=dsp_front_videos

Expect more videos to be added in the weeks/months/year ahead.

 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

With earnings season almost complete it has been a busy week for changes to broker ratings, the FNArena database showing a total of 19 upgrades and 51 downgrades to recommendations by the eight brokers covered. Total Buy ratings now stand at 52.15%, well down from 53.86% last week.

Among the upgrades were four companies where ratings were lifted by more than one broker – these were Bendigo and Adelaide Bank ((BEN)), CSL ((CSL)), David Jones ((DJS)) and Toll Holdings ((TOL)).

For Bendigo Bank, both RBS Australia and BA Merrill Lynch upgraded to Hold recommendations from Sell previously, the former as the recent profit result showed some signs of stabilisation and the latter on valuation grounds post recent share price weakness. Across the market price targets and earnings estimates for the bank were adjusted.

In contrast to a less bad result from Bendigo Bank, CSL delivered strong earnings thanks to albumin and specialty products performing well. Brokers lifted earnings estimates and price targets on the back of the result and both Macquarie and BA-ML now see enough value to upgrade to Buy ratings from Neutral previously.

For David Jones ((DLS)) it was the turn of both UBS and RBS Australia to upgrade to Neutral ratings from Sell previously, this to reflect both better value on the back of recent share price weakness and the company having better positioned itself for stronger FY13 results by clearing excess inventory.

Toll Holdings ((TOL)) has also improved its position and with potential for new contracts and some scope for positive earnings surprise relative to low expectations, both Macquarie and Deutsche Bank have upgrade to Buy ratings. This was partially offset by Credit Suisse downgrading to Neutral from Outperform on valuation grounds.

Among the other upgrades, a strong result from Ausenco ((AAX)) prompted UBS to reverse a recent downgrade and move to Buy from Sell, almost doubling its price target for the stock in the process. A similarly solid Coca-Cola Amatil ((CCL)) result, particularly given tough markets and a dispute with a key customer (Woolworths), was enough for Credit Suisse to upgrade to a Neutral view.

Emerging value following recent underperformance was enough for Citi to upgrade Oil Search ((OSH)) to Buy from Neutral, while around the market earnings estimates and price targets for the stock were largely increased following a better than expected profit result.

Super Retail Group ((SUL)) delivered one of the standout results in the consumer discretionary sector and this was enough for BA-ML to upgrade to a Buy rating, while again estimates and price targets across the market were lifted post the result. 

On the downgrade side those companies copping a cut in rating from more than one broker were Charter Hall Office ((CQO)), Envestra ((ENV)), Fleetwood ((FWD)), iiNet ((IIN)), Industrea ((IDL)), Kingsgate Consolidated ((KCN)), Ramsay Health ((RHC)), Tatts Group ((TTS)), Woodside ((WPL)) and Wotif.com ((WTF)).

Valuation was behind the downgrades to both Charter Hall Office and Envestra, with both Credit Suisse and Citi seeing limited share price upside from current levels for the former even allowing for current corporate interest and RBS and Macquarie taking similar views with respect to the latter.

While Fleetwood's result was broadly as expected, the solid earnings outlook is now priced in according to RBS, a view shared by both UBS and Credit Suisse. For iiNet increasing competitive pressures means the result was a little on the disappointing side for both RBS and Credit Suisse, while both also see less relative value in the stock at current levels than was the case a few months ago.

A poor profit result from Industrea meant earnings estimate across the market have been cut significantly, which leaves the outlook for little earnings growth this unattractive when compared to peers. The earnings miss has also raised the question of management credibility in the view of BA-ML.

Kingsgate Consolidated's earnings were broadly in line with expectations but the company surprised by announcing a capital raising that prompted cuts to estimates and targets. As well, Kingsgate faces a challenging year from an operational perspective in the view of both Citi and BA-ML. 

Uncertainty with respect to the outcome of proposed changes to private health insurance pose enough risks for Ramsay Health that both Macquarie and Deutsche Bank downgraded to a Neutral rating, this despite a result broadly in line with expectations. Valuation was behind the downgrade of Credit Suisse.

Limited upside potential, especially given some recent share price strength, saw both Macquarie and Citi downgrade to Sell ratings on Tatts, while less value following recent gains was enough for Citi and Credit Suisse to downgrade Woodside to Neutral from Outperform in both cases. A similar story is behind downgrades by Macquarie and BA-ML on Wotif.com, as tough market conditions suggest limited upside from current share p[rice levels.

In terms of changes to price targets, the largest increase was seen in Ausenco, as along with the near doubling in target from UBS, the likes of RBS, Macquarie and Deutsche also lifted their targets significantly. 

Aside from the capital raising induced changes to targets for Kingsgate, the most significant cut in target was experienced by Alumina Ltd ((AWC)), both RBS Australia and JP Morgan cutting their targets on revisions to earnings and related commodity price estimates. 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 AUSENCO LTD Sell Buy UBS
2 BENDIGO AND ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED Sell Neutral RBS Australia
3 BENDIGO AND ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED Neutral Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
4 BILLABONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Sell Neutral Deutsche Bank
5 CFS RETAIL PROPERTY TRUST Neutral Buy UBS
6 COCA-COLA AMATIL LIMITED Sell Neutral Credit Suisse
7 COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY OFFICE FUND Sell Neutral Credit Suisse
8 CSL LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
9 CSL LIMITED Neutral Buy BA-Merrill Lynch
10 DAVID JONES LIMITED Neutral Neutral RBS Australia
11 DAVID JONES LIMITED Sell Neutral UBS
12 MACQUARIE ATLAS ROADS GROUP Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
13 MIRVAC GROUP Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
14 OIL SEARCH LIMITED Neutral Buy Citi
15 PERPETUAL LIMITED Sell Neutral UBS
16 SONIC HEALTHCARE LIMITED Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
17 SUPER RETAIL GROUP LIMITED Neutral Buy BA-Merrill Lynch
18 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
19 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
Downgrade
20 AMCOR LIMITED Buy Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
21 AMP LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
22 BILLABONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Buy Sell Credit Suisse
23 CHALLENGER FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP Buy Neutral Citi
24 CHARTER HALL OFFICE REIT Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
25 CHARTER HALL RETAIL REIT Neutral Neutral UBS
26 COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY OFFICE FUND Buy Neutral UBS
27 DISCOVERY METALS LIMITED Neutral Neutral Citi
28 DIVERSIFIED UTILITY AND ENERGY TRUSTS Buy Neutral UBS
29 DOWNER EDI LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
30 ENVESTRA LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
31 ENVESTRA LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
32 FKP PROPERTY GROUP Neutral Sell Citi
33 FLEETWOOD CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
34 FLEETWOOD CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
35 FLEETWOOD CORPORATION LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
36 FLETCHER BUILDING LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
37 FLIGHT CENTRE LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
38 GR ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
39 IINET LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
40 IINET LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
41 ILUKA RESOURCES LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
42 INDUSTREA LIMITED Buy Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
43 INDUSTREA LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
44 KINGSGATE CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
45 KINGSGATE CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Neutral Sell Citi
46 KINGSGATE CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Neutral Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
47 MACQUARIE ATLAS ROADS GROUP Buy Neutral JP Morgan
48 MORTGAGE CHOICE LIMITED Sell Sell UBS
49 PERSEUS MINING LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
50 RAMSAY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
51 RAMSAY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
52 RAMSAY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
53 REA GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
54 SEEK LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
55 ST BARBARA LIMITED Neutral Sell Citi
56 TATTS GROUP LIMITED Neutral Sell Macquarie
57 TATTS GROUP LIMITED Neutral Sell Citi
58 TATTS GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
59 TATTS GROUP LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
60 TEN NETWORK HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
61 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
62 TOX FREE SOLUTIONS LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
63 Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Buy Neutral RBS Australia
64 TREASURY WINE ESTATES LIMITED Neutral Sell Macquarie
65 UNITED GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
66 WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
67 WOODSIDE PETROLEUM LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
68 WOOLWORTHS LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
69 WOTIF.COM HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
70 WOTIF.COM HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 AAX 25.0% 100.0% 75.0% 4
2 SYD - 25.0% 17.0% 42.0% 6
3 MGR 43.0% 71.0% 28.0% 7
4 CSL 38.0% 63.0% 25.0% 8
5 GNC 50.0% 67.0% 17.0% 6
6 OST 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
7 CFX 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
8 SHL 75.0% 88.0% 13.0% 8
9 OSH 75.0% 88.0% 13.0% 8
10 GMG 63.0% 75.0% 12.0% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 KCN 60.0% - 20.0% - 80.0% 5
2 TTS 38.0% - 13.0% - 51.0% 8
3 IIN 80.0% 40.0% - 40.0% 5
4 ENV 17.0% - 17.0% - 34.0% 6
5 TOX 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 3
6 AMP 88.0% 63.0% - 25.0% 8
7 WES 38.0% 13.0% - 25.0% 8
8 WPL 38.0% 13.0% - 25.0% 8
9 AMC 75.0% 50.0% - 25.0% 8
10 ILU 88.0% 63.0% - 25.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 AAX 3.110 4.485 44.21% 4
2 REA 13.243 13.963 5.44% 7
3 EHL 1.218 1.283 5.34% 6
4 DOW 4.146 4.367 5.33% 7
5 FLT 23.448 24.660 5.17% 8
6 IIN 3.232 3.380 4.58% 5
7 TPI 0.877 0.915 4.33% 6
8 OST 1.203 1.253 4.16% 7
9 TOX 2.583 2.683 3.87% 3
10 CSL 34.293 35.516 3.57% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 KCN 8.966 7.435 - 17.08% 5
2 AWC 1.784 1.589 - 10.93% 8
3 PBG 0.737 0.672 - 8.82% 7
4 CGF 5.474 5.039 - 7.95% 7
5 BEN 8.986 8.513 - 5.26% 8
6 WES 31.961 30.335 - 5.09% 8
7 AMP 5.054 4.834 - 4.35% 8
8 SFR 8.800 8.440 - 4.09% 5
9 GFF 0.593 0.569 - 4.05% 8
10 PRU 3.853 3.712 - 3.66% 6
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 GBG 0.057 1.343 2256.14% 6
2 AIO 18.625 26.325 41.34% 8
3 AAX 27.380 33.960 24.03% 4
4 SKE 18.767 21.233 13.14% 3
5 BLY 42.214 47.184 11.77% 8
6 CTX 119.600 132.867 11.09% 6
7 MAH 7.200 7.825 8.68% 4
8 GNC 85.683 92.200 7.61% 6
9 SDM 18.500 19.867 7.39% 3
10 ASL 33.440 35.840 7.18% 5

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 AWC 1.416 0.144 - 89.83% 8
2 SFR 27.450 17.260 - 37.12% 5
3 WHC 27.717 17.550 - 36.68% 6
4 MQA 28.300 22.183 - 21.61% 6
5 GFF 6.363 5.300 - 16.71% 8
6 AIX 21.650
article 3 months old

A Few Truths About Australian Banks

By Rudi Filapek-Vandyck, Editor FNArena

It's not easy to be a banker in Australia these days. Everybody, from politicians to journalists and consumer organisations and central bankers, has an opinion about the banks, and it is seldom a positive one. In the share market, there's virtually nothing left of the popularity that made banking stocks so dominant in investment portfolios pre-2008.

These days banking stocks are being held responsible for Australia's underperformance in comparison with equities in the US (because banks represent about 20% of the S&P200 index and about double that when measured against market capitalisation). Some experts have been warning their clientele against banks "doing a Telstra" in the years ahead, implying they will continue paying out a high dividend, but potentially against the background of continuously declining share prices.

Such widespread pessimism seems justified given the banks' own admission they had been writing unprofitable mortgage loans earlier in the year. Reason why the sector hiked rates this month while the official cash rate remained unchanged. But how much of all this is mere perception rather than reality? Are investors in Australia becoming too negative at a time when investment bankers are raising ratings for banks in the US and Europe to Buy?

Let's start with a few facts that may surprise some among you.

Banks cannot be held responsible for the sheer underperformance of Australian share market indices for the simple reason that most banks, believe it or not, have outperformed the likes of BHP Billiton ((BHP)) and Rio Tinto ((RIO)) since equity markets started "normalising" in March 2009. As I explained in earlier writings, this can be partially explained by the fact that banks pay out annual dividends double as high as BHP does (Rio pays out much less).

Moreover, and surely this would have escaped most investors' attention, shareholders who have stuck with their shares in CommBank and ANZ Bank since the dizzying peak in early November 2007 have today recouped all losses endured in the credit crunch and Lehman Bros collapse sell-offs. Thanks to consistently growing fully franked banking dividends, total investment returns from peak levels in 2007 are positive today (without taking into account potential extra tax benefits from franking). Not something shareholders in most other blue chip stocks in Australia can equally boast about, including the two big miners BHP and Rio Tinto.

When we look inside the sector, performances for banking stocks today are no longer as uniform as they were pre-2008. This becomes immediately apparent when we line up total investment returns for the past three years:

- CommBank ((CBA)) 80%
- ANZ Bank ((ANZ)) 71%
- Suncorp ((SUN)) 60%
- National Australia Bank ((NAB)) 46%
- Bendigo & Adelaide Bank ((BEN)) 40%
- Westpac ((WBC)) 39%
- Bank of Queensland ((BOQ)) 18%

What the table above clearly shows is that the changing dynamics for the sector have led to pronounced divergences in investment returns, with investors clearly distinguishing the weaker players from the stronger, and the more risky banks from the safer, solid options. It is obvious Bank of Queensland stands out in terms of overall vulnerability, which today translates into the largest valuation discount built into the share price. CommBank remains the numero uno "safe-haven" when the going gets tough. Also, witness what has happened to Westpac which seemed firmly on its way to claim sector leadership in 2008, until CEO Gail Kelly and her board decided to purchase the troubled St George Bank.

As such, Westpac has provided Australian investors with yet another example of how most corporate acquisitions are to the benefit of shareholders in the target, not so much for shareholders in the acquiring company.

The rankings in the table above are remarkably similar for share price performances in 2011, when overall risk appetite was low and share market risks were being perceived as very high. I believe there's a clear message in this for shareholders in the sector. Just as investors flock to Coca-Cola Amatil ((CCL)) instead of Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) and to Telstra ((TLS)) instead of Mesoblast ((MSB)) when the world appears to be going pear-shaped, there's now a clear divergence in risk profiles inside the banking sector too.

Note how ANZ Bank's Asian expansion has catapulted the stock to the number two position in the sector, only behind the perpetually-expensive CommBank. I bet most readers will be surprised to find Suncorp on position number three. Suncorp doesn't tend to get a lot coverage in the financial press, unless when disaster strikes, but Suncorp shares finished 2011 pretty much unchanged if we include dividend pay-outs. Bank of Queensland, on the other hand, last year significantly underperformed even the big miners, including dividends.

The ranking above is again being reinforced this reporting season with National and Westpac disappointing with their market updates, while Commbank pleased and ANZ Bank surprised to the upside. Note that Bendigo and Adelaide Bank kept its interim dividend flat (hasn't happened for either of the Big Four as yet).

What about the way forward?

Australian banks are now in a low growth environment. Instead of 20%-plus growth each year (as was the case pre-2008) they are positioned for low single digit growth in years to come. This conforms with current market expectations, suggesting there's no longer a mismatch between analysts' expectations and actual industry dynamics (except, maybe, for Bank of Queensland). Note that while banks will have to again raise the interest on mortgages independently from the RBA, I believe they will do exactly that and so achieve current low growth expectations.

I believe all of the above gives investors clear guidelines about how to play the sector in 2012, and beyond. At times of risk aversion, CommBank will outperform all others. Long-term investors worried about capital preservation and still looking for a healthy dividend yield (grossed up 9.5% including full franking credits) should definitely think twice before abandoning the shares. On a risk-reward basis, however, one must conclude that ANZ shares have more upside potential given a lower valuation and more positive surprise potential from the Asian operations. Dividend yields for both stocks are the same (at closing prices on Monday).

If, however, risk appetite returns with a vengeance, or things turn out much better than currently expected in the year(s) ahead, then shares of Westpac or Bank of Queensland offer the highest return potential. As said, for this to happen both industry dynamics and overall risk appetite will have to improve noticeably. Westpac CEO Gail Kelly still has the task at hand to translate the expanded network through the added St George operations into superior leverage, but if she were to succeed, a big catch-up in share price should follow. In the absence of any concrete evidence, however, I wouldn't consider such a scenario as even remotely likely.

With central banks providing more and more extra liquidity to the global financial system (see People's Bank of China lowering reserve requirements over the weekend) it is probable that stocks in miners, energy companies and biotechs will outperform the banks in weeks and months to come. However, the past years have clearly shown what happens when risk appetite turns for the worse. Banks outperform, not in the least because of their hefty dividends, and the best of the crop, CommBank and ANZ, seem pretty good in preserving the capital of their shareholders too.

(This story was written on Monday, 20th February 2012. It was sent out on that day in the form of an email to paying subscribers at FNArena).

Note: part of the calculations used in this story were derived from Stock Doctor.

****

Your Editor will be presenting at the upcoming Trading and Investing Expo in Perth (17-18 March).

For free entry tickets to the Expo, click on the link and head to the ticketing section of the event website and when asked to enter the Promotional Code simply type in this code RUDI and you will be provided with unlimited free Expo tickets saving you $15 per ticket.

http://www.tradingandinvestingexpo.com.au/special-offers/rudi-filapek-vandyck-ticket-offer/

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

Changes in short positions on the Australian market for the week from February 7 showed some interesting movements, as positions for some companies rose from negligible levels to more significant positions and for others they declined in a similar matter.

In terms of increases the most substantial was in Linc Energy ((LNC)), where total shorts rose to 5.75% from 3.82% previously, this despite little news from the company over the past few weeks (but a lot of share price movements, predominantly to the down side). The observed spike continues a trend that has seen shorts in Linc rise to current levels from around 1.8% the month before. Shorts also jumped in Southern Cross Media ((SXL)) to 2.3% from just more than 0.8% the week before, this increase coming prior to the group's interim result later this month.

Energy World Corporation ((EWC)) rose to near the top of the board in terms of short position increases for the week from February 7, total shorts essentially doubling to 2.68% from 1.32% the week prior.

Heading into its result this month shorts have increased for PaperlinX ((PPX)) to more than 1.8% from less than 0.7% previously, while Hastings Diversified ((HDF)) saw a similar increase to 1.88% from 0.77% previously.

Among a largely unchanged top 20, Billabong ((BBG)) saw shorts rise to 11.84% from 10.88% previously. Note this was before the company outlined plans to ease its constrained financial position and before private equity expressed interest in the retailer.

Top 20 short positions for the week ending February 7 continue to be dominated by the consumer discretionary sector given JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)), Billabong, Myer ((MYR)), David Jones ((DJS)), Flight Centre ((FLT)) Harvey Norman ((HVN)) and The Reject Shop ((TRS)) are all on the list.

Bank of Queensland ((BOQ)) scored the largest decline in shorts for the week from February 7, positions declining to 3.35% from 5.19% previously. While some asset quality and funding issues remain there continue to be brokers that see value in BOQ at current levels. More importantly, maybe, is that bank results have not been as bad as feared by sector bears. MEO Australia ((MEO)) saw the other major fall in shorts, total positions for the week declining to 0.33% from 1.84%. This week MEO announced it had acquired some 3D seismic surveys that will help define drilling locations in coming months.

In terms of monthly changes from January 13 the significant short positions in both JB Hi-Fi and Myer both declined modestly, while shorts in Rio Tinto ((RIO)) and Bathurst Resources ((BTU)) also came down by around 1.4 percentage points. Despite the decline, Rio Tinto remains in the top 20 of largest short positions.

Increases in shorts were more significant over the month, with Rialto Energy ((RIA)) seeing short positions jump from virtually none to just over 5.0%, while Linc, Lynas Corporation ((LYC)) and OneSteel ((OST)) all saw increases of more than 2.0 percentage points.

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 21075487 98833643 21.33
2 FXJ 284038351 2351955725 12.10
3 BBG 30292609 255102103 11.84
4 MYR 69188671 583384551 11.81
5 DJS 58427589 524940325 11.11
6 ISO 579126 5403165 10.72
7 FLT 9439617 100009946 9.44
8 LYC 158092111 1714296913 9.26
9 COH 4801120 56902433 8.40
10 TRS 1804664 26071170 6.91
11 HVN 73147455 1062316784 6.89
12 WTF 14495787 211736244 6.84
13 SEK 22477184 337101307 6.65
14 OST 82098529 1342393583 6.09
15 GNS 51353845 848401559 6.02
16 CRZ 13856706 233264223 5.94
17 PPT 2428312 41980678 5.80
18 LNC 29108913 504487631 5.75
19 CSR 26201717 506000315 5.17
20 RIO 22476202 435758720 5.15

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

In what may be either a barometer on reporting season to date or an indication recent market gains are making value harder to find, the FNArena database has seen 28 ratings downgrades over the past week. This compares to just eight upgrades and means total Buy recommendations now stand at 53.86%.

Among the upgrades was Commonwealth Bank ((CBA)), where Citi lifted its rating to Neutral from Sell to reflect a few factors becoming less negative than had been the case. Changes to earnings estimates meant a lift in price target and this also supported the rating upgrade.

Also scoring an upgrade by Citi was Graincorp ((GNC)), the broker moving to Buy from Neutral as the company's guidance for full year earnings came in above expectations. The guidance remains conservative in Citi's view and with valuation attractive at current levels a more positive rating is now justified. Price target was also increased.

There is also longer-term value on offer in JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)) in the view of Macquarie, who expects an eventual recovery in consumer spending and so an eventual recovery in the JB Hi-Fi share price. Others struggle to see such value, as Credit Suisse downgraded to Underperform from Neutral on the stock given an uncertain medium-term outlook and few shorter-term catalysts.

While Primary Health Care's ((PRY)) interim result missed expectations full year earnings guidance has been maintained, which was enough for both RBS Australia and Credit Suisse to adopt more positive views. Both brokers upgraded to Buy ratings from Neutral previously, with valuation the catalyst for the change following recent share price underperformance.

Interim earnings from Transfield ((TSE)) and updated full year guidance didn't prompt a lot of changes to broker models, but JP Morgan saw enough to upgrade to Overweight from Neutral. More disciplined capital use and improved efficiencies are positives, while the broker sees an expected share buyback as share price supportive as well.

AGL Energy ((AGK)) was among those stocks suffering a downgrade in rating, RBS moving to a Neutral recommendation from Buy previously. This is because while a move to acquire more of the Loy Yang A asset is likely, so too is a capital raising to pay for any such acquisition.

Alumina Ltd ((AWC)) has also been downgraded by both RBS and Credit Suisse to Neutral ratings from Buy, the former as while earnings were as expected the decision to pay a dividend rather than pay down debt was disappointing. For Credit Suisse the problem is the market and while prices mean some capacity will be removed, it will take some time for higher pricing to flow through to improved earnings for Alumina.

Credit Suisse has also downgraded both AMP ((AMP)) and ARB Corporation ((ARP)) to Neutral from Outperform recommendations, the former as the latest result showed a deterioration in balance sheet quality and the latter on valuation grounds given an elevated current earnings multiple.

For Beach Petroleum ((BPT)), Citi's downgrade to a Sell from Neutral comes despite guidance coming in well above the broker's estimate. The big concern for Citi remains the cost and viability of the Cooper Shale Gas operations, which leaves the broker preferring the likes of Santos ((STO)) in the sector.

Citi also downgraded Bunnings Warehouse Property ((BWP)) to Neutral from Buy, as while a solid profit result was posted a lack of valuation upside is likely to make any share price outperformance difficult from here.

Macquarie downgraded Carsales.com ((CRZ)) to Underperform from Outperform as post the interim result there appears to be more downside than upside risk. This largely reflects Macquarie's expectation of a market share war with rising competitor Carsguide.

David Jones ((DJS)) also offers some downside earnings risk in the view of Credit Suisse, enough for the broker to downgrade to an Underperform rating. The broker also has some shorter-term concerns given the loss of Stephen Goddard as CFO.

Still tough market conditions have seen Macquarie lower earnings estimates and price target for GWA ((GWA)). The broker has downgraded to a Neutral rating from Outperform. Valuation is the issue for James Hardie ((JHX)) according to UBS and sees a downgrade to Sell from Neutral, while RBS has downgraded Mermaid Marine ((MRM)) to Hold from Buy on the same basis.

A more cautious approach to the group's Middle East operations has been enough for Deutsche Bank to downgrade Leighton Holdings ((LEI)) to a Neutral rating from Buy previously, while tepid earnings guidance from Oakton ((OKN)) given still tough IT markets has prompted both UBS and Credit Suisse to downgrade to Neutral ratings from Buy previously.

Increased costs for non-core ventures prompted a profit warning from Mortgage Choice ((MOC)) and this was enough for UBS to downgrade to a Sell rating from Neutral. Earnings estimates were also adjusted lower, meaning a cut in price target.

Among resource plays both Oz Minerals ((OZL)) and Paladin ((PDN)) suffered two downgrades during the week, the former on valuation grounds and the latter given some concerns in the market with respect to cash generation ability leading into some debt maturities.

In the view of RBS, the slight miss with respect to earnings at Coles could put some pressure on the Wesfarmers ((WES)) share price, while Macquarie's downgrade on Westfield Group ((WDC)) reflects better value elsewhere in the sector.

Lower margins and higher costs at Royal Wolf Holdings ((RWH)) saw Macquarie downgrade forecasts and its recommendation to Neutral from Outperform, while the broker similarly downgraded its rating on Slater and Gordon ((SGH)) post what was perceived as a disappointing interim. Finally, recent share price outperformance from Tatts ((TTS)) has been enough for Deutsche Bank to downgrade to a Hold rating. 

Most significant in terms of changes to price targets were increases for Domino's Pizza ((DMP)) as brokers lifted estimates on the back of a strong interim result, while targets for Alumina Ltd and Paladin both fell as lower earnings forecasts were incorporated into models. 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA Sell Neutral Citi
2 GRAINCORP LIMITED Neutral Buy Citi
3 JB HI-FI LIMITED Neutral Buy Macquarie
4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Neutral Buy RBS Australia
5 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
6 TRANSFIELD SERVICES LIMITED Neutral Buy JP Morgan
Downgrade
7 AGL ENERGY LTD Buy Neutral RBS Australia
8 ALUMINA LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
9 ALUMINA LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
10 AMP LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
11 ARB CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
12 BEACH PETROLEUM LIMITED Neutral Sell Citi
13 BUNNINGS WAREHOUSE PROPERTY TRUST Buy Neutral Citi
14 CARSALES.COM LIMITED Buy Sell Macquarie
15 DAVID JONES LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
16 GWA GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
17 JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V. Neutral Sell UBS
18 JB HI-FI LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
19 LEIGHTON HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
20 MERMAID MARINE AUSTRALIA LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
21 MORTGAGE CHOICE LIMITED Neutral Sell UBS
22 OAKTON LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
23 OAKTON LIMITED Buy Neutral Credit Suisse
24 OZ MINERALS LIMITED Neutral Sell UBS
25 OZ MINERALS LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
26 PALADIN ENERGY LTD Neutral Sell Macquarie
27 PALADIN ENERGY LTD Buy Neutral UBS
28 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Neutral Sell Macquarie
29 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LIMITED Neutral Neutral Macquarie
30 ROYAL WOLF HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
31 SLATER & GORDON LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
32 TATTS GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
33 WESFARMERS LIMITED Neutral Sell RBS Australia
34 WESTFIELD GROUP Buy Neutral Macquarie
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 PRY 38.0% 63.0% 25.0% 8
2 TSE 40.0% 60.0% 20.0% 5
3 GNC 50.0% 67.0% 17.0% 6
4 CPU 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
5 COH - 38.0% - 25.0% 13.0% 8
6 GMG 63.0% 75.0% 12.0% 8
7 AQG 50.0% 57.0% 7.0% 7
8 ROC 75.0% 80.0% 5.0% 5

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 BWP 50.0% - 25.0% - 75.0% 4
2 TRS 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 3
3 CRZ 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 6
4 PDN 71.0% 43.0% - 28.0% 7
5 ARP 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 4
6 OZL 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 8
7 AWC 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 8
8 GWA 50.0% 33.0% - 17.0% 6
9 DMP 67.0% 50.0% - 17.0% 6
10 MRM 83.0% 67.0% - 16.0% 6
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 DMP 7.105 8.098 13.98% 6
2 COH 58.681 59.806 1.92% 8
3 MRM 3.502 3.567 1.86% 6
4 GNC 8.517 8.658 1.66% 6
5 TRS 11.617 11.767 1.29% 3
6 CBA 50.431 51.038 1.20% 8
7 LEI 23.434 23.626 0.82% 8
8 CPU 9.174 9.246 0.78% 7
9 CRZ 5.452 5.492 0.73% 6
10 TLS 3.373 3.391 0.53% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 AWC 1.784 1.589 - 10.93% 8
2 PDN 2.454 2.191 - 10.72% 7
3 TSE 2.770 2.580 - 6.86% 5
4 WES 31.961 30.549 - 4.42% 8
5 PRY 3.459 3.314 - 4.19% 8
6 AMP 5.149 4.986 - 3.17% 8
7 PBG 0.760 0.737 - 3.03% 7
8 DJS 2.713 2.656 - 2.10% 8
9 GWA 2.462 2.413 - 1.99% 6
10 AGK 16.489 16.295 - 1.18% 8
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 GBG 0.086 1.343 1461.63% 6
2 TAP 2.125 3.075 44.71% 4
3 ROC 6.009 6.536 8.77% 5
4 TAH 44.513 48.163 8.20% 8
5 GNC 85.683 92.200 7.61% 6
6 CTX 119.583 126.817 6.05% 6
7 AQG 73.818 77.711 5.27% 7
8 NCM 173.363 181.000 4.41% 8
9 PPT 134.986 140.157 3.83% 7
10 DMP 36.317 37.500 3.26% 6

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 SGM 111.971 - 10.914 - 109.75% 7
2 AQP 7.129 - 0.273 - 103.83% 5
3 AWC 1.417 0.181 - 87.23% 8
4 HZN 2.066 1.366 - 33.88% 4
5 WHC 27.717 20.317 - 26.70% 6
6 WSA 40.150 31.750 - 20.92% 6
7 GFF 6.363 5.450 - 14.35% 8
8 SAI 29.725 26.925 - 9.42% 8
9 OZL 88.271 80.663 - 8.62% 8
10 FMG 53.066 48.584 - 8.45% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Short Report

.ref1 {background-color:#B8E3F8;}

By Chris Shaw

For some time the majority of the major short positions on the Australian market have been retail stocks or those companies exposed to discretionary spending, a positioning that has been proven to be justified with the likes of JB Hi-Fi ((JBH)) reporting interim results indicating trading conditions remain very difficult.

The market has not adjusted its positioning significantly over the past week, as among the top short positions are JB Hi-Fi, Myer ((MYR)), David Jones ((DJS)), Billabong ((BBG)) and Harvey Norman ((HVN)), as well as discretionary spending plays such as Flight Centre ((FLT)) and Wotif.com Holdings ((WTF)).

Outside of retail exposed stocks, interest is in the more significant changes in short positions in recent sessions. Among the largest increases in shorts for the week from January 31 was in Linc Energy ((LNC)), where positions increased by 1.66 percentage points to 3.82%. This follows the release of the group's quarterly production report at the end of last month.

Lynas Corporation ((LYC)) also saw shorts jump by a little more than 1.6ppts to 8.79%, an increase that has continued even after the company was granted a temporary operating licence for its LAMP facility in Malaysia.

Australian Infrastructure ((AIX)) shorts increased from less than 0.4% to nearly 2.0% for the week from January 31, which may be a reflection of some concerns stemming from pressure on the group's airport assets given Hochtief is having trouble selling its stake in the Budapest and Athens airports.

Shorts also rose significantly in Kingsgate Consolidated ((KCN)), total positions jumping to 2.75% from less than 1.2% previously. This came despite a quarterly report that surprised to the upside in production terms.

The largest weekly increase in shorts came from Billabong ((BBG)), with a jump of 1.8ppts to 10.88% enough to reverse what had been a similar sized decline in short positions in the stock the previous week.

Declines in company short positions were less pronounced for the week from January 31, Fortescue leading the way with a fall of 1.96ppts to total shorts of just 1.68%. This followed a solid quarterly production report but one that showed some sign of margin slippage.

Other significant declines in short positions for the week were in Asciano ((AIO)), where shorts now stand at less than 0.9%, and in Rialto Energy ((RIA)), where shorts have again dropped below 5.4% from 6.7% previously. On a monthly basis Rialto has still seen shorts rise from almost zero to more than 5.0%, while the decline in shorts for Asciano follows a period of relative underperformance by the stock against peers.

The largest fall in weekly shorts was in ISO, a Small Ordinaries ETF derivative. Total shorts here fell by more than 5.5ppts to 11.42%.

Elsewhere among the monthly changes, OneSteel ((OST)) has seen shorts rise by 2.5ppts to 5.7% and Linc by 2.4ppts to 3.8%. The changes for OneSteel come as the company continues to deal with still difficult steel and iron ore market conditions.

The major monthly declines in shorts have been seen in Gloucester Coal ((GCL)) and QR National ((QRN)), which has been the peer performing the best relative to Asciano in recent weeks. Despite months of poor performance in share price terms, shorts in QBE Insurance ((QBE)) declined in the month from January 6 to 1.39% from 2.16% previously.
 

Top 20 Largest Short Positions

Rank Symbol Short Position Total Product %Short
1 JBH 21818917 98833643 22.06
2 MYR 72408624 583384551 12.37
3 FXJ 269346195 2351955725 11.49
4 ISO 617102 5403165 11.42
5 DJS 58318435 524940325 11.09
6 BBG 27818742 255102103 10.88
7 FLT 9344731 100009946 9.33
8 LYC 150716728 1713846913 8.79
9 COH 4573208 56902433 8.01
10 WTF 14197112 211736244 6.70
11 HVN 68900358 1062316784 6.48
12 TRS 1652056 26071170 6.34
13 CRZ 13981140 233264223 5.99
14 PPT 2475051 41980678 5.89
15 SEK 19892549 337101307 5.89
16 OST 76775962 1342393583 5.72
17 GNS 46938546 848401559 5.52
18 RIA 23038796 431256264 5.35
19 RIO 22749882 435758720 5.20
20 BOQ 11947637 229598329 5.19

To see the full Short Report, please go to this link

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS REPORT

The above information is sourced from daily reports published by the Australian Investment & Securities Commission (ASIC) and is provided by FNArena unqualified as a service to subscribers. FNArena would like to make it very clear that immediate assumptions cannot be drawn from the numbers alone.

It is wrong to assume that short percentages published by ASIC simply imply negative market positions held by fund managers or others looking to profit from a fall in respective share prices. While all or part of certain short percentages may indeed imply such, there are also a myriad of other reasons why a short position might be held which does not render that position “naked” given offsetting positions held elsewhere. Whatever balance of percentages truly is a “short” position would suggest there are negative views on a stock held by some in the market and also would suggest that were the news flow on that stock to turn suddenly positive, “short covering” may spark a short, sharp rally in that share price. However short positions held as an offset against another position may prove merely benign.

Often large short positions can be attributable to a listed hybrid security on the same stock where traders look to “strip out” the option value of the hybrid with offsetting listed option and stock positions. Short positions may form part of a short stock portfolio offsetting a long share price index (SPI) futures portfolio – a popular trade which seeks to exploit windows of opportunity when the SPI price trades at an overextended discount to fair value. Short positions may be held as a hedge by a broking house providing dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) underwriting services or other similar services. Short positions will occasionally need to be adopted by market makers in listed equity exchange traded fund products (EFT). All of the above are just some of the reasons why a short position may be held in a stock but can be considered benign in share price direction terms due to offsets.

Market makers in stock and stock index options will also hedge their portfolios using short positions where necessary. These delta hedges often form the other side of a client's long stock-long put option protection trade, or perhaps long stock-short call option (“buy-write”) position. In a clear example of how published short percentages can be misleading, an options market maker may hold a short position below the implied delta hedge level and that actually implies a “long” position in that stock.

Another popular trading strategy is that of “pairs trading” in which one stock is held short against a long position in another stock. Such positions look to exploit perceived imbalances in the valuations of two stocks and imply a “net neutral” market position.

Aside from all the above reasons as to why it would be a potential misconception to draw simply conclusions on short percentages, there are even wider issues to consider. ASIC itself will admit that short position data is not an exact science given the onus on market participants to declare to their broker when positions truly are “short”. Without any suggestion of deceit, there are always participants who are ignorant of the regulations. Discrepancies can also arise when short positions are held by a large investment banking operation offering multiple stock market services as well as proprietary trading activities. Such activity can introduce the possibility of either non-counting or double-counting when custodians are involved and beneficial ownership issues become unclear.

Finally, a simple fact is that the Australian Securities Exchange also keeps its own register of short positions. The figures provided by ASIC and by the ASX at any point do not necessarily correlate.

FNArena has offered this qualified explanation of the vagaries of short stock positions as a warning to subscribers not to jump to any conclusions or to make investment decisions based solely on these unqualified numbers. FNArena strongly suggests investors seek advice from their stock broker or financial adviser before acting upon any of the information provided herein.

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Weekly Broker Wrap: Index Targets Moving Higher

By Chris Shaw

As global macro news flow has surprised to the upside in the first weeks of 2012, Goldman Sachs has responded by lifting its global growth forecasts. At the same time, the broker notes investor sentiment is improving and additional risk is being added to portfolios.

This has forced a review of prospective market multiples for the current year. As a result, Goldman Sachs has lifted its forecasts for the ASX200 index. Previous forecasts had assumed investors remains relatively risk averse for at least the first half of this year, this due to ongoing downside risks stemming from the European sovereign debt situation.

But given the better data coming out and the pick up in investor sentiment, Goldman Sachs has lifted its prospective multiple for the ASX200 for 1H12 to 11.5 times from 10.5 times. Further expansion to a multiple of 11.8 times is expected by the end of the year. This forecast compares to a long-run average of 13.7 times for the Australian industrials market since 1989 (on Goldman Sachs' calculations).

Revised forecasts for the ASX200 now stand at 4,340 for the end of June and 4,600 for the end of December, up 5.9% and 2.2% respectively from previous estimates. Looking at 2013, Goldman Sachs has also lifted its forecasts but only modestly, end June and end December estimates increasing by 0.5% each to 4,780 and 5,025 respectively.

Top-down earnings per share (EPS) forecasts have also been revised. For FY11 Goldman Sachs now expects industrial EPS growth of 2.0%, down from 4.5% previously, while in FY12 there should now be 2.0% growth against a previous forecast of flat results. Forecasts for the resource sector for FY12 have also improved, to minus 8.0% from minus 10% previously.

Looking at the Australian economy, from the middle of last year UBS had expected unemployment would drift up to around 5.5% from 5.2%, the move consistent with some further, but modest, monetary policy easing by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

In terms of how things have actually played out, UBS notes Australia's unemployment rate has stayed around 5.25%. This suggests a relatively stable job market that is near full employment. But at the same time actual jobs growth has slowed to zero from around 3.0%, which UBS suggests implies a weaker jobs market.

This raises the question of whether, going forward, hiring intentions will collapse to the weaker jobs growth outcome or will there be a pick-up in jobs growth in-line with an improvement in job ads and hiring intentions?

UBS's view is hiring intentions may better capture tightness in the labour market than does the jobs growth figure. This leads to the expectation of a modest increase in unemployment from current levels, with the rate unlikely to reach the level of 6.0% being forecast elsewhere in the market. 

Given Australian economic data remain mixed and offshore risks are yet to be resolved, UBS sees the RBA as having room to trim the cash rate again if it decides to do so. But with labour hiring intentions still firm, UBS's view is the RBA may soon be back to a more clear “on hold” position with respect to the cash rate.

The RBS decision to leave the cash rate unchanged this week surprised many, but in BA Merrill Lynch's view the decision should have little impact on the Australian REIT sector. One reason for this is the lack of likely earnings surprises, especially given rent collecting now accounts for around 90% of sector revenues.

Underlying growth across all property classes should receive some support from 5-15 year leases with fixed or CPI+ rent increases. This, in BA-ML's view, should be enough for the REIT sector to continue outperforming the broader market.

The lack of the expected rate cut should have no great bearing beyond the very short-term in BA-ML's view, as the decision doesn't impact on expected total returns for the sector of 12-15%. These returns should be supported by ongoing asset sales and capital returns, so helping close what is currently a 15-25% gap to net tangible assets (NTA).

BA-ML suggests earnings growth will also be helped by lower debt costs and declining base rates, this as the REITs lower leverage via asset sales. Forecasts assume the housing market does nothing more than stabilise over the next 12 months, while median house prices are expected to fall a further 5% and housing starts a further 6%.

Under such assumptions, BA-ML's top picks in the Australian REIT sector are Mirvac ((MGR)), Dexus ((DXS)) and Westfield Group ((WDC)). Among the mid-caps Centro Retail ((CRF)) and Charter Hall Group ((CHC)) are preferred.

Further on Australian property plays, Citi has looked at the exposure of the residential developers to any supply and demand imbalances in the market at present. The first finding was over the past year, affordability has been more important in driving property demand than has undersupply in the Australian market.

As Citi points out, projects with good affordability tend to have materially higher sales on average per year than do projects with lower levels of affordability. Further, those projects with good affordability in areas of under supply tend to sell on average 26% better per annum. In other words, undersupply doesn't automatically translate to high demand if the product is not affordable.

Among the Australian developers, Citi notes Stockland ((SGP)) and Australand ((ALZ)) offer the highest levels of portfolio affordability at 82 and 79% respectively. In contrast, affordability for FKP Property ((FKP)) and Mirvac stands at around 58% and 46% respectively.

If affordability is such an important driver, Citi sees risk for some lower performing projects to cut prices, which would likely impact on project margins and profitability. Even allowing for this, Citi suggests implied valuations continue to price in a more bearish scenario than is warranted by overall performance. 

This is especially the case in recovering businesses such as Australand and Mirvac. In both cases, Citi sees upside potential for share prices if the upcoming profit reporting season can deliver some positive light on the outlook for both companies. 

Mirvac is Citi's picks of the developers over the shorter-term. This reflects a recovering development business, valuation upside, scope for near-term positive newsflow and more than 90% of net profit in both FY12 and Fy13 secured by Trust net operating income and pre-development sales.

Longer-term, Citi suggests Stockland's combination of a strong balance sheet, higher residential profitability and a superior landbank with geographical diversification should provide a greater buffer than that of its peers. This is especially the case if the market was to enter another period of constrained capital and weaker buyer behaviour.

Turning to the banking sector, Deutsche Bank takes the view the first quarter of 2012 won't be a great one given the combination of funding pressures, no asset re-pricing benefits, redundancy costs and a negative marking-to-market for wealth management earnings. This combination has seen Deutsche trim earnings estimates for the major Australian banks, the cuts in the order of 2.0-2.7%. 

Deutsche expects many of these issues will start to normalise in in the second half of 2012, as the banks should achieve a re-pricing of their mortgage books and start to show signs of some cost benefits. As a consequence, Deutsche cautions against reading too much into the results for the first quarter.

In terms of sector preference, Deutsche Bank's top picks among the big four banks remain ANZ Banking Group ((ANZ)) and National Australia Bank ((NAB)), both of which are rated as Buy. Hold ratings are ascribed to both Commonwealth Bank of Australia ((CBA)) and Westpac ((WBC)). 


Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

As reporting season gets underway brokers have continued to fine tune their models, with ratings downgrades still the dominant change. Among brokers in the FNArena database there were 16 downgrades over the past week compared to just four upgrades, leaving total Buy ratings standing at 54.8%.

Among the upgrades was Computershare ((CPU)), Deutsche Bank lifting its rating to Buy from Hold given the view the tide is starting to turn for the stock. According to Deutsche, cyclical revenues appear to be bottoming out, while acquisitions and or capital management also offer some potential upside.

Retail stocks continue to find the going tough but this hasn't stopped Deutsche upgrading Harvey Norman ((HVN)) to Buy from Hold. Expectations for the stock should be tempered somewhat though as the move follows a change in analyst, who is more positive on the potential for the group's property portfolio to underpin value.

RBS Australia upgraded Nexus Energy ((NXS)) to Buy from Hold on the back of the company's announcement the Crux assets would be developed into an integrated gas and liquids project. As RBS notes, the deal clears up funding issues for Nexus, while also offering greater clarity with respect to long-term growth plans.

Stockland ((SGP)) was also upgraded but only to Neutral from Underperform, this following a review of its model by Credit Suisse. Changes to assumptions meant an increase in price target, enough for the broker to lift its rating in line with its total return system.

On the downgrade side of the ledger, Alumina Ltd ((AWC)) was lowered to Sell from Neutral by BA Merrill Lynch, the broker arguing lower global production is a negative for alumina prices and so Alumina's earnings.

BA-ML also downgraded Ansell ((ANN)) to Neutral from Buy, as while interim earnings were broadly as expected the broker sees few shorter-term catalysts to drive share price outperformance. BA-ML wasn't alone in downgrading Ansell, as JP Morgan made a similar move to reflect ongoing Australian dollar headwinds and the postponement of a share buyback, which must have disappointed the stockbroker.

JP Morgan also downgraded Ardent Leisure ((AAD)) to Neutral from Buy to reflect lower theme park numbers stemming from wet weather in Queensland, while Bunnings Warehouse Property ((BWP)) copped downgrades to Neutral ratings from both JP Morgan and BA-ML as while both see the yield as attractive, there is limited value in the stock relative to the sector.

Also in the property sector, Centro Retail ((CRF)) was downgraded by UBS to Neutral from Buy, largely on valuation grounds given a recent run-up in the share price. Valuation was also the reason for RBS Australia downgrading Cochlear ((COH)) to a Hold from Buy previously.

It was a similar story for Telstra as Citi moved to a Neutral rating from a Buy recommendation, while recent share price appreciation has been enough for RBS to downgrade both Webjet ((WEB)) and Toll Holdings ((TOL)) to Hold from previous Buys. For Webjet the downgrade came despite a solid interim result that saw forecasts and targets lifted across the market.

Tough conditions in the IT market have caused Data#3 ((DTL)) and Reckon ((RKN)) to find the going more difficult of late and both have paid the price, RBS downgrading the former to Hold from Buy and Macquarie making a similar change on the latter.

The finance sector is not finding things much easier as evidenced by a profit warning from Macquarie Group ((MQG)) and a disappointing quarterly report from National Australia Bank ((NAB)). This prompted downgrades in both cases, Citi moving to a Neutral rating on Macquarie and Deutsche doing the same with NAB.

Among the resource plays, Mount Gibson ((MGX)) was cut by JP Morgan to Neutral from Overweight The change followed what the broker viewed as shocker of a result, with realised prices lower and costs higher than expected. As well, board room issues remain, which is adding to the uncertainty surrounding the stock.

With respect to changes to earnings estimates, Cochlear was among the more significant of the increases thanks to an interim result that suggested little market share loss stemming from its product recall. On the cuts to forecasts side Sims Group ((SGM)) saw estimates lowered on the back of revised earnings guidance, while forecasts for Gunns ((GNS)) were also cut as brokers adjust their models for a proposed capital raising.

 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 COMPUTERSHARE LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
2 HARVEY NORMAN HOLDINGS LIMITED Neutral Buy Deutsche Bank
3 NEXUS ENERGY LIMITED Neutral Buy RBS Australia
4 STOCKLAND Sell Neutral Credit Suisse
Downgrade
5 ALUMINA LIMITED Neutral Sell BA-Merrill Lynch
6 ANSELL LIMITED Buy Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
7 ANSELL LIMITED Buy Neutral JP Morgan
8 ARDENT LEISURE GROUP Buy Neutral JP Morgan
9 BUNNINGS WAREHOUSE PROPERTY TRUST Buy Neutral BA-Merrill Lynch
10 BUNNINGS WAREHOUSE PROPERTY TRUST Buy Neutral UBS
11 CENTRO RETAIL AUSTRALIA Buy Neutral UBS
12 COCHLEAR LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
13 Data#3 Limited Buy Neutral RBS Australia
14 MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
15 Mount Gibson Iron Limited Buy Neutral JP Morgan
16 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED Buy Neutral Deutsche Bank
17 RECKON LIMITED Buy Neutral Macquarie
18 TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
19 TOLL HOLDINGS LIMITED Buy Neutral RBS Australia
20 Webjet Limited Buy Neutral RBS Australia
 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 DXS 14.0% 43.0% 29.0% 7
2 CPU 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
3 SGP 57.0% 71.0% 14.0% 7
4 HVN 25.0% 38.0% 13.0% 8
5 FBU 63.0% 75.0% 12.0% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 WEB 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 4
2 RKN 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 4
3 NAB 75.0% 50.0% - 25.0% 8
4 CRF 60.0% 40.0% - 20.0% 5
5 AAD 67.0% 50.0% - 17.0% 6
6 ANN 29.0% 14.0% - 15.0% 7
7 MQG 57.0% 43.0% - 14.0% 7
8 QAN 88.0% 75.0% - 13.0% 8
9 AWC 63.0% 50.0% - 13.0% 8
10 COH - 25.0% - 38.0% - 13.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 WEB 2.413 2.780 15.21% 4
2 ANN 14.471 15.254 5.41% 7
3 COH 56.504 58.681 3.85% 8
4 HVN 2.289 2.364 3.28% 8
5 TLS 3.341 3.385 1.32% 8
6 DXS 0.937 0.949 1.28% 7
7 SGP 3.611 3.641 0.83% 7
8 CPU 9.174 9.246 0.78% 7
9 RKN 2.530 2.533 0.12% 4

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 HGG 2.216 2.090 - 5.69% 5
2 AWC 1.871 1.784 - 4.65% 8
3 MQG 30.406 29.437 - 3.19% 7
4 NAB 27.015 26.388 - 2.32% 8
5 QAN 2.074 2.030 - 2.12% 8
6 AAD 1.380 1.370 - 0.72% 6
7 WBC 23.040 22.903 - 0.59% 8
8 SUL 6.647 6.626 - 0.32% 7
9 CBA 50.494 50.431 - 0.12% 8
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 TCL 8.529 13.443 57.62% 7
2 COH 234.263 282.238 20.48% 8
3 TAH 44.438 47.713 7.37% 8
4 CDI 4.775 5.100 6.81% 4
5 WEB 17.125 17.825 4.09% 4
6 WTF 26.413 26.738 1.23% 8
7 OST 13.086 13.229 1.09% 7
8 SGP 31.643 31.914 0.86% 7
9 ASL 33.240 33.440 0.60% 5
10 CPB 307.043 308.729 0.55% 6

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 GNS 1.275 - 0.725 - 156.86% 3
2 SGM 111.971 2.114 - 98.11% 7
3 PAN 6.800 4.700 - 30.88% 4
4 AQP 9.226 7.126 - 22.76% 5
5 MQG 248.243 211.229 - 14.91% 7
6 AWC 1.586 1.417 - 10.66% 8
7 PRU 19.083 17.200 - 9.87% 6
8 TEN 7.104 6.466 - 8.98% 8
9 AIX 23.017 21.650 - 5.94% 6
10 QAN 14.138 13.388 - 5.30% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.