Tag Archives: Banks

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Back From The Brink, Again?

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed down 100 points or 0.9% while the S&P fell 0.7% to 1165 and the Nasdaq lost 0.3%.

Tomorrow the eurozone may be no more. At least that would potentially be the fallout were the German constitutional court to deliver an adverse ruling prior to the opening bell on Wall Street tonight. The court is to decide whether the initial bail-out of Greece in 2010 breached the German people's property rights, whether the government acted illegally in contributing to subsequent Portuguese and Irish bail-outs without first obtaining parliamentary approval and, on an EU scale, whether ECB purchases of eurozone sovereign debt are illegal under the Maarstricht Treaty.

Legal experts do not, however, believe an adverse ruling will be delivered. Rather they expect the court to insist all future loan packages to eurozone members must first be approved by the German parliament. Such a ruling might save the eurozone, but it would also restrict the German government's capacity to act swiftly in a financial crisis. European response times have already been painfully protracted. The requirement for parliamentary approval would only slow the process further and encourage more market volatility in the meantime.

It is also expected that tonight German chancellor Angela Merkel will address parliament. As a compromise offer, her party has drafted a proposal to grant the German parliament veto rights over the European Financial Stability Fund.

Why does Germany want to save the eurozone anyway? Recent election results suggest the German people are dead against using taxpayer funds to prop up profligate Club Med members and were there are general election tomorrow, and not in 2013, Merkel would most likely lose power to those pushing an anti-euro barrow. 

There are two reasons: (1) allowing eurozone members such as Greece to default and withdraw would resonate back into German banks holding Greek and other eurozone sovereign debt, impacting on taxpayer loans and deposits anyway; and (2) Germany has been the greatest beneficiary of the common currency, given the weakness of peripheral economies has offset the strength of German and other northern European economies, keeping a cap on what would otherwise be the German mark, and thus rendering Germany's significant export industry competitive on a global scale. Germany's economy relies heavily on its manufacturing industry, and we all know what happens to manufacturing industries when one's currency becomes overly strong.

The Swiss certainly appreciate this problem, which is why last night the Swiss National Bank shocked the world by announcing the franc would no longer float freely, but would be capped against the euro at an EUD-CHF rate of 1.20. The Swiss franc was trading at EUD 1.12 at the time of announcement and hence rallied (ie the Swiss franc fell) nearly 10% in a blip – an extraordinary move for any currency.

All year the Swissy has been the paper currency of choice, playing global safe haven alongside gold. Like Australia, Switzerland's economy has been suffering as a result. 

This was the state of play in early trading in Europe last night, which saw further substantial falls on European stock markets. The German index fell another 4% having fallen 5% the night before, and European bank stocks were all again down double digit percentages. Having had a day off, Wall Street opened in the middle of the ongoing mayhem. The Dow immediately fell over 300 points.

Did anyone say Lehman? The CEO of Deutsche Bank certainly did on Monday to much criticism. The similarities are obvious – in 2007, US and other investment banks maintained unrealistic valuations of toxic CDOs on their books when a mark-to-market would effectively render them worth zero, and once mark-to-markets were enforced the ensuing solvency crisis threatened to bring down all US institutions. In the end, only Lehman was allowed to fall. In 2011, European banks are valuing sovereign debt positions for Greece et al on their books at unrealistic levels on the basis of default being prevented by ECB and bail-out fund intervention. Were these bonds to be marked to the levels priced by bond markets, European banks would find themselves insolvent. Of course we can't really call the situation in reality “another Lehman”. It's just the same Lehman, which was passed on to public from private hands and has never gone away.

Yet it is also true that the worst of the sovereign debt positions held by European banks represents only about 6% of bank capital – enough to spark capital adequacy and liquidity issues but not enough to render a bank insolvent as long as the credit market does not freeze as it did in 2007-08. Last month new IMF chief Christine Lagarde told European banks they needed to urgently recapitalise with private funds ahead of public funds where necessary. Yet most European banks have lost around half their market capitalisation value in 2011, so raising new capital at these levels would be basically untenable. Last night the IMF backed away from Lagarde's statement and suggested the number of European banks requiring forced recapitalisation are actually very few.

It was a turning point.

Around the same time, the Greek finance minister stepped up to say that the Greek government intended to speed up the structural reforms and austerity measures need to satisfy bail-out requirements. Can we believe him? Yesterday it seemed as if Greece was deliberately failing to comply, eyeing default and eurozone exit as the lesser of the evils. But the minister insisted that implementation was indeed progressing, it was just being held up in a backlog of reforms.

And while all of this was going on, general strikes were underway in Italy to protest Italy's new austerity package, as insisted upon by the ECB, as it moves to debate in the Italian senate.

As European stock markets headed towards their closing bells and the morning session on Wall Street unfolded, a rally ensued. The German and French markets ultimately closed down only 1%, while London closed up 1%. Wall Street wobbled its way up but by its closing bell the Dow had recovered 200 of those initial 300 points.

Aiding buying interest on Wall Street was the release of the US services sector PMI, which rose to 53.3 in August from 52.7 in July when economists had expected a fall to 51.0. Could all this talk of double-dip again be overly pessimistic? Jobs aside, US economic data have not been that bad of late. Throw in what transpired in Europe overnight, which by day's end seemed almost more encouraging than discouraging, and clearly there were enough bargain hunters seeing value in US stocks.

The German court could throw a spanner in these works tonight, but that is not what is expected.

If the Swissy is no longer a safe haven option, where does the money go? Well the obvious choice is gold, and that's exactly where the money went initially. Spot gold traded up to US$1920/oz and talk was of US$2100-2200 now being a given in the wake of the Swiss move, but by the same token the near 10% collapse in the Swissy sent the US dollar index up 1% to 75.93, providing US dollar gold with quite a headwind.

In the end, gold fell US$26.70 to US$1873.60/oz but this was most likely reflective of some profit-taking, with few expecting the gold trend to alter at this stage. But gold is a very crowded market now, many note, rendering it less attractive as safety investment.

US bonds perhaps? Well if you buy US bonds now as a safe haven against both European bonds and a US recession you'd probably find buying support from the Fed later in the month, with QE3 expected to take the form of a sell short-buy long end “twist”. But under 2%, the US ten-year yield is as low as it has ever been, including in the GFC, so there's not a lot of upside. By the close that yield was little changed at 1.98%.

Perhaps the true safe haven answer lies in something real, something “hard”, something that actually has a purpose beyond funny money currencies, unpayable debt and shiny stuff. Perhaps that's why Brent crude was up US$2.97 to US$112.89/bbl last night, despite having fallen the night before, and despite the big move up in the dollar index. West Texas crude closed little moved at US$86.51/bbl, but then that effectively represents two days of trade, and WTI is irrelevant anyway.

One might argue the same could be true for base metals, but base metals do not hold the same “monetary inflation hedge” aura as does oil. So last night base metals were little moved.

So how does all of this affect the Aussie? The Aussie is down half a cent in 24 hours to US$1.0493, but that's as much about a slightly weaker than expected June quarter net exports result released in Australia yesterday ahead of today's GDP result. So really the Aussie is maturing, one might suggest, into not just a risk trader's plaything but into an actual safe haven substitute. Unless, of course, the developed world falls apart again and takes China with it.

And what of our poor, battered stock market? Weighing up the developments of Friday and Monday's trade against the moves in Europe and last night's move in the US, we appear to have been oversold. On that basis, the SPI overnight is up 60 points or 1.5% to recover some ground.

From here on anything can happen, and probably will. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

The Monday Report

By Greg Peel

It was revealed on Friday that Greece has failed to meet even the trivial conditions of its 2011 E110bn loan from the EU-IMF let alone the fundamental conditions, the Wall Street Journal notes. Greece's budget deficit has blown out beyond targets, disposal of state assets has failed to meet revenue targets and even simple bureaucratic requirements have been neglected.

One might be tempted to suggest a level of intent here.

The breakdown in debt negotiations on Friday, in which Greece halted talks and postponed until later in the month, suggests the planned second bail-out package for Greece for 2012 will not eventuate. Many euro members are reluctant to contribute further anyway, and restructuring of Greek debt held by the private sector is unlikely to solve any problems, so realistically Greece is now headed to full default – just as many have assumed for the past two years.

Experts suggest the EU-IMF will at least hand over the next tranche of the 2011 bail-out fund this month, allowing time for European parliaments to approve the E500bn European Financial Stability Fund in time for the expected fall-out.

For almost two years the eurozone has attempted to keep a bankrupt Greece afloat in so doing avoid a fracturing of, and a serious loss of global confidence in, the common currency and the eurozone as a workable construct. No doubt it is clear to Greece that the choice between years of austerity and a stunted economy as a eurozone basket case or the sharp impact of a default and eurozone extrication is akin to the choice between the proverbial slow or fast methods of band-aid removing. Commentators often point to Russia, which defaulted in 1998 but recovered quickly from the impact to be one of the world's leading emerging markets. The reestablishment of a sharply devalued drachma would make many necessities very expensive for Greeks but would also quickly reinvigorate Greece's leading exports such as tourism, thus bringing in much needed foreign currency.

The problem in the meantime lies with the extent of Greek debt held by European banks and the reverberations a Greek default would cause around the European financial sector. On Friday the Greek stock index fell 4.5%, Italy 3.9%, France 3.6%, Germany 3.4% and the UK 2.4%.

One presumes the action on European markets would have been enough to send Wall Street rapidly south from its open as it was, but ahead of the bell on Friday it was revealed no jobs were added in the US in August when additions of 93,000 were expected. Wall Street had braced itself for a potentially bad result – Goldman Sachs forecasters only had a 25,000 expectation – but this was a shocker.

Wall Street fell sharply from the bell and then largely maintained that level for the rest of the session as offices began to clear for the Labor Day long weekend. The Dow finished down 253 points or 2.2% while the S&P lost 2.5% to 1173, smashing through support at 1200. Presumably Wall Street will now take QE3, in some way, shape or form, as a given, which may well have prevented a more protracted slide on Friday. The jobs number is a serious blow for President Obama who will front the American public on Thursday night (Friday morning AEST) to present his Administration's new fiscal policy strategy, which will centre around job creation.

The response in the US bond market on Friday reflected either a flight to safety or expectations of QE3 or both, as the ten-year yield plunged 15 basis points to 1.99%. Its GFC (and historical) low was 1.97%. Similarly gold jumped US$58.80 to US$1884.20/oz and silver jumped 4% despite a 0.2% gain in the US dollar index to 74.71, driven by the fall in the euro.

Base metals in London were all weaker on mixed movements while Brent crude lost US$1.96 to US$112.33/bbl and West Texas fell US$2.28 to US$86.65/bbl despite tropical storm Ted brewing in the Gulf. 

The Aussie fell 0.8% to US$1.0645 and the SPI Overnight fell 63 points or 1.5%.

It's difficult to see Greece not now moving to default. There is no way Angela Merkel's government would survive on a platform of continuing to use German taxpayer funds to prop up the Greek economy for the sake of the eurozone. In a sense, Greece's apparent recalcitrance provides somewhat of an easy “out” of the building resentment across the zone to additional contributions for Greece and may make the EFSF ratification easier if it is seen to be for the protection of contributor states.

As to what happens now is the case in point. Has the world prepared itself sufficiently for the not-so-unsurprising outcome of a Greek default? Perhaps we will again see coordination between the major central banks of the world, providing wider implications for the Fed's QE3.

There are not many economic data releases in the US this week, with the Fed's Beige Book of economic activity on Wednesday following Tuesday's service sector PMI. The trade balance is due on Thursday and wholesale trade on Friday.

The European Central Bank will make its monthly policy announcement on Thursday which may take on a new tone, and the Bank of England is also due an update. The first revision of the eurozone June quarter GDP comes out on Tuesday following the global round of service sector PMIs on Monday (except the US).

Having closed the books on the August result season in Australia attention now turns to the June quarter GDP result due on Wednesday. After weather-led contraction in the March quarter, economists are expecting a return to growth with a 1.0% quarter on quarter gain, affecting 0.6% growth year on year. Ahead of the result there are still some Q2 numbers to be released, with company profits and inventories today and net exports and the current account tomorrow.

There is also a raft of monthly data due, beginning with the service sector PMI, ANZ job ads and the TD Securities inflation gauge today. Tuesday sees home loans and investment lending, Wednesday the construction sector PMI, and Thursday unemployment. On Tuesday the RBA makes a rate decision.

At this stage it is most likely the RBA will suggest it will be holding off on any thought of a rate rise for some time ahead. The central bank has suggested ongoing uncertainty in the US and Europe would prompt such a response. There is as yet no sign the RBA is considering a need to cut rates but then what transpires now in Europe may just alter that stance. The current cash rate of 4.25% is considered by the board to be “mildly restrictive”. Maybe one 25bps drop to a “neutral” position may yet be the tonic required before Christmas.

On that note, China will on Friday provide its monthly “data dump” of inflation, retail sales, industrial production and investment data and Japan will provide a revision to its June quarter GDP, which on first estimate was well received.

Australian investors should take note that there are a lot of stocks going ex-dividend this week, and particularly today, which can provide the illusion of a weak market. It's going to be weak today anyway, and then there's no Wall Street tonight.

This week FNArena's Market Insight program on the BRR network (brr.com.au) will break down the Australian result season and its implications. Tune in on Thursday at 4.30pm or check out the vodcast thereafter.

Your Editor Rudi will make his usual appearance on Lunch Money, Sky Business, on Thursday 12-1pm (prior to Market Insight). On Friday, Rudi will participate in BRR's Friday Afternoon Round Table (3pm).

For further global economic release dates and local company events please refer to the FNArena Calendar.

article 3 months old

The Only Way Is Up For NAB?

29/8:

LAYMANS:
The ideal scenario was for the final leg south to kick into gear and break the $22.50 area once and for all. With this feat achieved we’re in a position to see a longer term trend to the upside offering plenty of upside potential over the rest of the year and into early next. It certainly kicked off on the right track with buyers almost falling over themselves to take positions around the $20.00 - $21.00 region. This was beginning to show itself on the run up to the 9th of August low with volume starting to expand. This can only mean that there were plenty of willing buyers around those lower levels. The strong reversal bar on the aforementioned date was a very strong signal that the pull-back had run its course. Also notice how volume remained reasonably high during the subsequent rise yet has started to taper off as some profit taking kicked in. This is very typical at this stage of the trend and can only be viewed in a positive light. The ideal situation over the short term is to see one final probe lower into the target area though I’m not convinced it’s going to come to fruition. If the recent high at $23.85 is overcome with ease over the coming days then the next significant move north is already underway. Not ideal from a pattern perspective but a realistic possibility if the broader markets can continue to show resilience. Either way, NAB is looking the best it’s been for some time.

TECHNICAL:
The lacklustre price action since May 2010 was making for frustrating trading conditions so the comprehensive break through the zone of support is actually a positive attribute in regard to the bigger picture. More importantly, the subsequent impulsive leg higher clearly shows intent which of course is exactly what we want to see. With symmetry now intact it seems likely that the larger degree wave-(B) is firmly in position with the impulsive leg from that point in time completing minor degree wave-i. As can be seen the typical 50.0% - 61.8% retracement level hasn’t been tagged as yet so in a perfect world one final decline will take price into the target area though it’s by no means a requirement. When a powerful trend is underway it’s often the case that a shallower counter trend move takes shape and that’s certainly a possibility in this instance. A comprehensive break above the high of wave-i would mean wave-ii hasn’t quite fulfilled its pattern obligations but would augur well over the coming weeks. Bigger picture NAB isn’t looking as strong as CBA which is something we often mention though it remains a fact that can’t be denied. With a clear 3-leg move up to the October 2009 high it means we can only be in the midst of a much larger corrective pattern though of course if wave-(C) is underway significantly higher levels are going to be tagged over the medium term. So despite not being the greatest stock in terms of relative strength there is no reason to be dismissing the company with a decent trend either already underway or will be shortly.


Trading Strategy

29/8:
If the more typical pattern is to be seen then look for signs of strength once the typical retracement zone has been tagged. This would offer the best risk/reward trade though as mentioned above it’s by no means set in stone that the final decline is going to be seen. More aggressive traders could buy following a penetration above the high of wave-i with the initial stop just beneath the prior pivot low which at this stage is $22.12 although this could change over the coming sessions. Not our favourite stock within the Sector for sure though if our labelling is correct initiating positions in this general region could be very profitable over the medium term.

The views above are the author's, not FNArena's.

Re-published with permission of the publisher. www.thechartist.com.au All copyright remains with the publisher.

Risk Disclosure Statement

THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING SECURITIES AND LEVERAGED INSTRUMENTS I.E. DERIVATIVES, SUCH AS FUTURES, OPTIONS AND CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. YOU SHOULD THEREFORE CAREFULLY CONSIDER YOUR OBJECTIVES, FINANCIAL SITUATION, NEEDS AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH TRADING IS SUITABLE FOR YOU. THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN OBTAINABLE IN FUTURES, OPTIONS AND CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE TRADING CAN WORK AGAINST YOU AS WELL AS FOR YOU. THE USE OF LEVERAGE CAN LEAD TO LARGE LOSSES AS WELL AS GAINS. THIS BRIEF STATEMENT CANNOT DISCLOSE ALL OF THE RISKS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVES MARKETS. THEREFORE, YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR ACCOUNTANT TO DETERMINE WHETHER TRADING IN SECURITES AND DERIVATIVES PRODUCTS IS APPROPRIATE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

Technical limitations If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Greece Fights Back

By Greg Peel

The Dow rose 254 points or 2.3% while the S&P gained 2.8% to 1210 and the Nasdaq added 3.3%.

Hurricane Irene did not cause as much damage to New York City as was feared, but while the NYSE was open it was still difficult for many in the financial market workforce to make it into town. Hence volume on the exchanges was light last night. We are also rapidly approaching the end of the month, and data shows fund managers a very underweight equities.

This means any sign of good news has the power to trigger a sharp upside scramble, which was pretty much the theme of things on Wall Street last night.

It is now the morning habit of a Wall Street trader on arising to first check whether any new havoc may have been wrought in Europe overnight before deciding what the day might bring. Last night traders awoke to the news two of Greece's largest banks had agreed to merge. The new entity would instigate an E1.25bn rights issue and E500m of convertible bonds would be issued to a Qatari investment fund which would provide a 17% stake on conversion. On face value, the tier one capital ratio of the new bank would reach 14%.

The news sent the Greek stock market up 14%, and the stock markets of Germany, France, Spain and Italy up over 2%.

Adding fuel to the fire was a scheduled testimony from ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet to the European Parliament suggesting eurozone growth would likely be weaker than expected and fear and uncertainty would remain heightened. While he also noted inflation would likely remain above 2%, the testimony was taken as a hint that the ECB did not intend to raise rates any further at this stage. We recall that as Greece threatened to implode and eurozone contagion threatened to spread earlier in the year, the ECB raised its cash rate, just as it had done during the 2007 credit crisis.

The news out of Europe was alone enough to inspire more confidence on Wall Street, and then along came the US July personal income and spending numbers. A double dip was back on the agenda last month when it was revealed spending fell in June and savings rose despite a rise in incomes, but July's numbers showed a 0.8% jump in spending on a 0.3% rise in incomes, and a drop in the savings rate to 5.0% from 5.5%. The increase matched the jump in February which was the biggest since mid-2009.

What double dip?

Of course it was August when the world began to fall apart, with debt ceiling wrangling and the S&P downgrade masking ongoing indecision in Europe, so there may be no point in getting too excited just yet. The other issue is that we are now officially in a “bad news is good news” phase given the world expects the Fed to act, one way another, if the US economy appears to be faltering. So do we thus say that good news must be bad news? Well, not on last night's performance. Maybe good news is good news and bad news is a good news safety net.

That seems to be how gold saw it last night. Last Friday on Wall Street we had the unusual, in recent times, situation in which both stocks and gold rallied. Up to then, money had been flowing out of stocks and into gold as a safe haven. On Friday, an open door for more QE measures from the Fed meant stocks rallied on stimulus potential and gold rallied on money printing potential. But last night gold fell as stocks rallied, by US$39.40 to US$1788.50/oz, given better economic news means less likelihood of money printing.

The fall in gold also formed part of a “risk on” session, in which stocks rose, the US ten-year bond yield rose 8bps to 2.28%, the VIX volatility index fell 9% to 32, and the Aussie jumped another cent to US$1.0688 despite the US dollar index being steady at 73.68.

Oil all rose, with West Texas up US$1.90 to US$87.27/bbl and Brent up US52c to US$111.88/bbl. It was a public holiday in the UK last night so the LME was closed and there was no base metal trading.

It was a solid day yesterday in Australia but the futures want to go on with it, as the SPI Overnight is up 58 points or 1.4%.

So once again we might ask the question, is it all over? Can life go back to normal again? The answer is maybe, but we should bear in mind that one European bank merger still leaves plenty of others in balance sheet difficulties, banks were up on the back of the news in New York but insurance companies led the charge, having been sold down heavily last week in case of Irene devastation. It's officially the last week of the summer holidays in the US, and volumes were very light last night given many could not get into work.

It's also close to month's end, and US fund managers are underweight equities. This could mean a very sharp rally both into September and beyond, but all we need is one little trigger out of a still turbulent Europe and we might be right back down again.

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

Total Buy ratings among brokers in the FNArena database continue to increase as the market works its way through profit reporting season, the database showing 51 upgrades this week against 25 downgrades. Total Buy ratings now stand at 57.9%, up from 56.2% last week.

Among those enjoying upgrades to ratings were Charter Hall Office ((CQO)) as models were adjusted to reflect both better than expected full year earnings and the sale of the group's US portfolio. Charter Hall Retail ((CQR)) similarly enjoyed an upgrade following a solid operational result for the full year.

A similarly good result from Super Retail ((SUL)) has seen ratings upgraded for what is regarded as one of the top picks in the retail sector, while a solid profit result and good earnings momentum in coming years saw upgrades for Challenger Financial Services ((CGF)).

Whitehaven Coal ((WHC)) has been upgraded given its attractiveness among a limited number of options for Australian coal plays, while recent share price weakness has seen an upgrade in rating for Ridley Corp ((RIC)). Others to enjoy upgrades over the past week include Blackmores ((BKL)) and Virgin Blue ((VBA)). 

On the downgrade side Mortgage Choice ((MOC)) has seen ratings lowered by two brokers despite what was regarded a solid profit result, while ANZ Banking Group ((ANZ)) suffered a similar fate post a below consensus trading update.

While the outlook for Beadel Resources ((BDR)) remains positive, the stock has been downgraded following the announcement of a capital raising, while the view risk remains to the downside was enough for Ardent Leisure ((AAD)) to equally receive a downgrade in rating.

Tough macro conditions explain the downgrade for Southern Cross ((SXL)), while new guidance from management is enough to generate a downgrade for Downer EDI ((DOW)). Board infighting is enough to see Mount Gibson ((MGX)) downgraded, while others seeing drops in ratings include Telecom New Zealand ((TEL)) and Telstra ((TLS)).

In terms of price targets, Increases to forecasts for ARB Corporation ((ARP)), Challenger, Mortgage Choice and Whitehaven have driven increases to broker target prices, while changes to models have also seen targets rise for the likes of Kingsgate Consolidated ((KCN)), Perseus Mining ((PRU)) and NRW Holdings ((NWH)).

Targets have fallen for Consolidated Media Holdings ((CMJ)), Seven West Media ((SWM)) and Southern Cross as slower growth expectations are factored into the media sector, while QBE Insurance ((QBE)) also saw cuts to targets as operating conditions remain difficult for the company.

Adjustments to earnings estimates in coming years have meant cuts to targets for Ausenco ((AAX)) and Ardent Leisure, while the board issues at Mount Gibson and a lack of catalysts for Boart Longyear ((BLY)) also impact on price target assessments.

Changes to earnings forecasts are largely profit result related, with increases to forecasts for Santos ((STO)), Woodside ((WPL)), Mortgage Choice, NIB Holdings ((NHF)) and Sedgeman ((SDM)) and cuts for BlueScope Steel ((BSL)), Beadel, QBE Insurance, DUET ((DUE)), Ardent Leisure, Australian Pipeline Trust ((APA)) and Goodman Fielder ((GFF)).

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 CQO - 14.0% 57.0% 71.0% 7
2 CQR - 14.0% 43.0% 57.0% 7
3 SUL 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 6
4 CGF 57.0% 100.0% 43.0% 7
5 WHC 33.0% 67.0% 34.0% 6
6 BKL 33.0% 67.0% 34.0% 3
7 RIC 33.0% 67.0% 34.0% 3
8 NWH 67.0% 100.0% 33.0% 3
9 AAX 50.0% 80.0% 30.0% 5
10 VBA 43.0% 71.0% 28.0% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 MOC 67.0% 33.0% - 34.0% 3
2 ANZ 63.0% 38.0% - 25.0% 8
3 BDR 50.0% 33.0% - 17.0% 3
4 AAD 83.0% 67.0% - 16.0% 6
5 SXL 86.0% 71.0% - 15.0% 7
6 DOW 57.0% 43.0% - 14.0% 7
7 MGX 88.0% 75.0% - 13.0% 8
8 TEL 38.0% 25.0% - 13.0% 8
9 TLS 63.0% 50.0% - 13.0% 8
10 PBG 38.0% 25.0% - 13.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 ARP 8.063 8.675 7.59% 4
2 WHC 6.842 7.108 3.89% 6
3 CGF 5.471 5.603 2.41% 7
4 MOC 1.427 1.460 2.31% 3
5 PRU 3.430 3.508 2.27% 6
6 KCN 9.270 9.456 2.01% 5
7 NWH 3.260 3.310 1.53% 3
8 NCM 44.126 44.626 1.13% 8
9 DXS 0.929 0.936 0.75% 7
10 CQR 3.287 3.310 0.70% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 CMJ 3.197 2.672 - 16.42% 7
2 SWM 4.845 4.103 - 15.31% 8
3 QBE 18.776 16.208 - 13.68% 8
4 AAX 3.375 3.016 - 10.64% 5
5 AAD 1.590 1.445 - 9.12% 6
6 MGX 2.163 1.988 - 8.09% 8
7 SXL 1.864 1.716 - 7.94% 7
8 BLY 4.879 4.544 - 6.87% 8
9 ANZ 24.824 23.399 - 5.74% 8
10 CTX 12.742 12.103 - 5.01% 6
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 STO 49.825 56.313 13.02% 8
2 WPL 183.740 205.667 11.93% 8
3 TOL 44.075 48.513 10.07% 8
4 MOC 14.000 15.267 9.05% 3
5 MRE 5.575 6.067 8.83% 4
6 NHF 12.933 14.067 8.77% 3
7 SDM 17.033 18.500 8.61% 3
8 TEL 17.297 18.353 6.11% 8
9 NWH 23.700 25.133 6.05% 3
10 PRU 19.000 20.100 5.79% 6

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 BSL 3.843 - 0.543 - 114.13% 7
2 BDR 9.300 7.633 - 17.92% 3
3 QBE 158.295 135.288 - 14.53% 8
4 DUE 12.763 10.969 - 14.06% 8
5 AAD 15.167 13.050 - 13.96% 6
6 KCN 119.640 106.880 - 10.67% 5
7 APA 21.563 19.413 - 9.97% 8
8 OGC 16.274 14.917 - 8.34% 3
9 GFF 10.663 9.813 - 7.97% 8
10 SWM 44.513 41.575 - 6.60% 8
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: And Don’t Forget Europe

By Greg Peel

The Dow fell 170 points or 1.5% while the S&P dropped 1.5% to 1159 and the Nasdaq lost 2.0%.

Hate to say it, but I've been saying it all week – no news out of Europe does not mean good news. Lack of developments across the pond has allowed Wall Street this week to focus on the now hackneyed subject of whether to QE or not to QE and one might argue that after a positive couple of sessions, last night was an opportunity to square up ahead of Jackson Hole. But Europe has not gone away.

The world stopped worrying about Greece mid-year and started worrying about Spain and Italy, but the reality is the European Financial Stability Fund tacitly agreed upon back then has never been ratified. It ran into a bit of a roadblock back in July when the minority (19%) True Finn party, which is anti-eurozone, forced the Finnish government to insist upon cash collateral from Greece in return for Finland's EFSF contribution.

What this effectively would mean is that some amount of the funds handed over by other eurozone members, particularly Germany and France, would go straight to Finland for safe keeping. A lot of grumbling followed, but the Finnish deal was reluctantly given the nod in principle. That is until Austria kicked up a fuss, and said it was against any collateral deals but if Finland was getting collateral, then Austria would need some too. Then the Netherlands piped up in agreement, as did economic powerhouses Slovenia and Slovakia.

You can see where this is heading, can't you? Oh yes, we'll all put funds into the EFSF, but we all want collateral in return, say, of the amount we put in. Call me old fashioned but I think I spot a flaw in the logic.

We won't be able to find out for a while what might happen to the EFSF, given Germany has suggested it may call a postponement of further discussions. Why? The Pope is coming to Germany. Oh well, fair enough.

Prayer might be all the eurozone has left.

In the meantime, the short-selling ban on European bank stocks put in place a fortnight ago is due to expire, but talk now is of extending it. This talk has financial markets furious. So what do you do when you can't sell European bank stocks? Well, you can sell US bank stocks as a proxy (this has been happening ever since the ban was announced) or you can sell futures as a proxy for the stock market in general. And that's exactly what someone did last night. A huge sell order hit the German DAX futures, and at one point the physical DAX fell 4%. It recovered to be down only 1.7%, but the whole episode was enough to spook Wall Street.

Funny, therefore, that Warren Buffet should choose last night to announce Berkshire Hathaway had bought US$5bn of newly created preference shares in the struggling Bank of America, at what analysts suggest is a substantial cost not to Buffet, but to BofA. Prefs are a form of hybrid debt, and Buffet stands to collect US$3bn in coupon payments over the next ten years irrespective of the share price movement. The announcement came a day after the CEO of BofA appeared on CNBC and insisted the bank was not looking to, and did not need to, raise fresh capital.

The news hit before the opening bell and provided Wall Street with a brief moment of strength, before macro factors took over. The other announcement of note, made after the close on Wednesday – that Steve Jobs was resigning as head of Apple – proved a fizzer, with Apple shares down less than the Nasdaq by the closing bell. BofA shares jumped 25% on the open (they're worth about tuppence-ha'penny), but settled back to be up only about 7%.

If European shenanigans were not enough to send Wall Street south last night, or squaring up ahead of Jackson Hole, another jump in the US weekly new jobless was enough to give stocks a downward shove as well.

“Square-up” seemed to be the trade of the day across all other markets too. Base metals rallied 1-2% as stocks fell, which was attributed to short covering. After falling US$150 in two days, gold found some support and rebounded US$20.60 to US$1771.90/oz. The US dollar index rose 0.3% to 74.24 and the Aussie fell 0.4% to US$1.0430.

The oil market is closely watching Hurricane Irene as well as being conservative ahead of tonight. Brent rose US47c to US$110.62/bbl and West Texas rose US14c to US$85.30/bbl. Irene is set to hit the US eastern seaboard and not the Gulf oil rigs.

With talk that the Fed's new tactic might be to swap short-end bonds in its balance sheet for long-end bonds, the US Treasury's auction of seven-years last night again saw another record low settlement yield. Traders were actually expecting lower than 1.58%, but foreign central banks bought 52% compared to a 40% running average. The benchmark ten-year yield fell a couple of bips to 2.22%.

The SPI Overnight fell 49 points or 1.1%.

There's no more I can say about Jackson Hole that I or anybody else hasn't already said, other than if you're really keen tune into your favourite business channel at midnight tonight (Eastern). And don't forget that Jackson Hole has rather drawn attention away from the fact the first revision of US June quarter GDP will be released tonight as well.

Local result season highlights today include Lend Lease ((LLC)) and Perpetual ((PPT)). RBA governor Glenn Stevens will provide the House of Ill Repute...sorry, the House of Representatives with a regular update which they won't understand. Pretty devious, that RBA, if you believe the unions. Gotta blame someone to get your face on the camera.

I'll be appearing on Sky Business today at 2pm

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Weighing Up Australia’s Bank Results

By Greg Peel

FNArena last updated analyst views on the banks on August 3, in light of what by that stage had become a 13% market correction in the wake of renewed Greek sovereign debt fears and emerging fears over Spanish and Italian debt, as well as weak growth and political bickering in the US.

At that point bank analysts had been lowering their credit demand growth expectations for the Australian banking sector, however this was a reflection of the weak state of the Australian non-resource sector economy and not a response to offshore issues. Business demand had remained very subdued despite long held expectations of an eventual post-GFC rebound, house prices had become flat to weaker, and the Australian consumer was all but missing in action.

Bank analysts had agreed at that point that weaker credit demand would not translate into equivalently weak earnings growth. More realistically, earnings growth would become sluggish but positive as lower credit demand remained weak because such weakness would reduce the need for further expensive offshore funding, reduce the potential for bad debt growth, and encourage more deposit funding from Australians. In reality, the banks would simply return to being the “defensive” stocks they used to be rather than the high-beta cyclicals they had become in the noughties credit boom.

Hence while analysts had slightly trimmed their bank target prices, they had not done so by much and as a result upside-to-target percentages from prevailing share price levels had blown out quite considerably as the following table from August 3 indicates. This had also meant an increase in the number of net broker Buy ratings in the FNArena database to 17 from 14 since the previous update in June.

Yet while global stock markets were looking somewhat weak around August 3, it was late on Friday, August 5 when Standard & Poor's downgraded the US and all hell was unleashed. It's now history that the Australian market plunged on the Monday and plunged again by 5% on the Tuesday, before staging an astonishing intraday comeback featuring a 7% rally from the low point. The market, many investors had decided, had become simply too oversold, and nowhere was there better value on offer than among the Big Four banks. At the lows on Tuesday, the banks were showing FY12 yields of up to 10% – fully franked.

What's more, those yields were pretty safe. Unlike 2008, Australia's banks are now well capitalised, have seen off the worst of bad debt issues, are still carrying provisions against further uncertainty and are not stretched on their dividend payout ratios. And clearly the Australian economy is, thanks to China, relatively strong at least in some sectors, and unemployment is low.

That extraordinary Tuesday was also, as it turned out, the day National Bank ((NAB)) had scheduled for its June quarter trading update. NAB's result matched analyst forecasts on the bottom line, the balance sheet had grown, bad debts had fallen, and on an individual note the bank had exited more of the toxic US assets it's been carrying since before the GFC. The result helped to encourage bargain hunting in the banking sector at that point and analysts agreed, suggesting Australian banks were oversold and all the anxiety had proven unfounded. NAB's result, they suggested, would provide a positive “read-through” for the other three.

That view seemed to be confirmed when the following day Commonwealth Bank ((CBA)) posted its full-year result for FY11. This time the result exceeded analyst expectations and the big profit figure evoked typical mass media hyperbole. Most notably for bank analysts, CBA's net interest margin had continued to improve.

CBA's perennial problem is, however, that its size and strength means the market has always maintained a premium share price relative to the other three banks including the also large Westpac ((WBC)). The premium may be well deserved, but it has also meant for some time that greater upside potential lies with the other three and particularly the smaller two, as far as bank analysts have been concerned.

For a while there it looked like the Australian stock market had weathered the US downgrade storm and was ready to resume rallying once more, but then along came the Westpac result. Having been lulled into assuming all the bank results would be impressive, the market was caught out when Westpac's result came in below consensus forecasts. The legacy of the St George acquisition was apparent given a sector-contradictory increase in bad debts, and it was clear to both bank analysts and bank management that Westpac needed to start an extensive cost cutting initiative.

Westpac's shares were subsequently trashed on the day, but Deutsche Bank, for one, believed this was a bit overdone (and no doubt reflective of heightened market anxiety). Deutsche noted Westpac's shares had been solidly bought in anticipation of a result matching those of NAB and CBA, so the subsequent sell-down meant correcting that premium. The analysts also noted Westpac had already begun to “clean up” its bad debt problems in the June quarter, suggesting the September quarter would provide a better outcome.

The last word was left to ANZ Bank ((ANZ)), which provided its quarterly update last Friday when European debt issues had flared yet again. Like Westpac, ANZ's result came in below expectations.

A breakdown of the numbers showed the “miss” was all about lower market trading profits in a time of increased volatility rather than any issue with traditional banking. The Macquarie analysts noted ANZ had elected to reduce its risk appetite in the quarter in market activities and this led to reduced profit opportunities. This fresh attitude will make it difficult for ANZ to match earnings growth numbers in the short term, but in the longer term management was at pains to point out the upside potential from that which differentiates ANZ from its peers, being its Asian growth initiatives.

Analysts agree there is longer term upside to be had, while also noting increasing competition in Asia as well as the slowing global growth environment will make short term profits more difficult to come by.

That slowing global growth factor has become more of a threat since FNArena's last bank update on August 3. Australian bank analysts have not changed their views on subdued local credit growth and sluggish earnings growth, but they have been forced to reduce their bank target prices to account for weaker global sentiment and thus lower PE multiples. However, the extent of the target reductions has not matched the extent of recent net share price weakness, so those upside-to-target numbers that looked so enticing in the above table now look even better:

Moreover, one might note the pre-franking yields that looked so attractive in the previous table also look even better in the fresh table.

In terms of recommendation changes, one must remember that bank analysts tend to rank the Big Four against each other more so than they do against the general market. On that basis, NAB has gained another Buy rating, further cementing its net preference among analysts, while ANZ and CBA have both lost a Buy rating. Westpac has kept its Buy ratings but gained a Sell so there has been no change in the net preference of one through four.

It's a story of contrast from the smaller and riskier NAB which the analysts feel in general is always oversold when market fear is heightened, through to the big, safe CBA which always ends up with an over-extended premium to the other three.

There is, of course, ongoing risk of a deteriorating debt situation in Europe and a deteriorating GDP situation in the US. Global funding costs, as benchmarked by the London Interbank Offer Rate (Libor), have finally begun to increase having previously managed to remain relatively stable through the chaos. This could mean a return to higher offshore funding costs for Australian banks.

The good news is that expensive funding from the GFC period has been rolling off and should be gone around mid-next year. Subdued local credit demand in the meantime means the banks do not need to access too much in the way of offshore funds, and the big jump in household savings and investor cash positions has meant a big boost in cheap local funding from deposits. The outlook for earnings may be utility-style “boring” ahead but Australian bank balance sheets are now among the strongest in the world and dividend levels appear under no threat. It is clear to see why bank analysts continue to see ever more attractive value in the Big Four.

The other problem we have to worry about, nevertheless, is the penchant for big US funds to dump on Australian banks as if they were still cyclicals every time Wall Street takes another tumble. This suggests we could still be in for a rough ride ahead. By the same token, all one hears now out of Wall Street is “buy dividends” so Australian banks can also be just as sought after from offshore on the good days.
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Fear Returns

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed down 419 points or 3.7% to 10,990 while the S&P fell 4.5% to 1140 and the Nasdaq dropped 5.2%.

If you wanted to put a finger on what really caused last night's sudden renewal of fear across global markets, I'd suggest you could sum it up in one word – Lehman.

What was most notable about Wednesday night's trade in the northern hemisphere was that the response to the disappointing Merkozy announcements was pretty benign. The concept of a eurobond was quickly dismissed, the EFSF was deemed to be already sufficient, and the idea of a financial transaction tax was touted. Yet on a net basis the European markets didn't respond much, and Wall Street closed flat.

So why is it that media reports will suggest today that last night's big fall, which begun in Europe, was due to fears over a transaction tax and a lack of further injection of EFSF funds? Unless you think of the response as being akin to a small child who thinks very hard before finally bursting into tears, what any sell-off really needed was a more frightening trigger. And that came last night when an unnamed European bank “went to the window”.

The expression means that a bank was forced to go to the ECB to ask for an emergency short-term loan – in this case E500m -- and that signals a liquidity issue. The implication is that the bank was finding it difficult to raise overnight funds in global money markets. The rumour, totally unsubstantiated, is that a US bank had gone cold on accepting a European bank as a counterparty, given the current risks. And that's how it all started in 2008 – first with Bear Stearns and then with Lehman Bros. No wonder there was panic.

European bank shares were again down double digit percentages, leading the UK, German and French stock indices all down 5-6%. The rout spilled into Wall Street from the open, and US banks ended the day down 5-10%.

If you want to take the Lehman analogy further, we can reflect on the fact the debt crisis of 2008 merely saw the problem pass from private to public hands, rather than actually being resolved. Back then, the issue was US investment banks owning “toxic” sub-prime debt which they belligerently continued to carry on their books at around 95c in the dollar when the market was bidding zero. Right now, the eurozone is refusing to mark down “toxic” peripheral sovereign debt to realistic levels as well. It all ended in tears in 2008. What might happen this time?

Perhaps the answer lies not in movements on global stock markets last night, but in movements on global bond markets. The bonds of the UK, Germany and France were all bought. The bonds of Spain and Italy were sold, but not by much at all. The yield on both ten years did not exceed 5% despite having been to 6% previously this month. The “safe haven” US bond was bought, but not by much. The ten-year yield fell only 10bps to 2.07% despite having hit an all-time record low 1.99% earlier in the session. The rise in US bond prices did not match the fall in US stocks.

Moreover, recently the ECB opened up its balance sheet to European banks for effectively unlimited six month loans. And the European banks haven't mucked around, having snapped up nearly E50bn to date. In other words, the European banks have been propping themselves up. By contrast, Lehman was allowed to go under.

There was nevertheless more to the story of weakness on wall Street last night.

The US July CPI rose a more than expected 0.5% on higher fuel prices, leaving the annual rate level with June at 3.6%. The core CPI rose 0.2%, increasing the annual rate to 1.8% from 1.6% in June. In theory, there will be no QE3 if US inflation is not falling.

US existing home sales fell an unexpected 3.5% in July to the lowest level since November. The Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index fell to minus 30.7 this month from plus 3.2 last month. Economists had expected a low but still positive number.

The compounding fear on Wall Street last night was, therefore, the old chestnut of double dip. And to top things off last week's new jobless claims in the US rose by 9,000 to be back above the critical 400,000 number once more.

Strangely, the Conference Board index of leading economic indicators for July went the other way, rising 0.5% after a 0.3% reading in June, and compared to a 0.2% forecast. However the rise reflected an increase in the money supply, which would be a result of the recent “flight to safety”, so take that out and economists suggest indicators are showing flat to very low US growth ahead.

Just to add fuel to the fire, a couple of Wall Street firms decided it was time to lower their global GDP forecasts, picking a bad day to do so.

Morgan Stanley lowered its 2011 global GDP growth forecast to 3.9% from 4.2% and 2012 to 3.8% from 4.5%. For Europe MS sees only 0.5% growth in 2012, down from 1.2%, and in China 8.7%, down from 9.0%. Goldman Sachs also trimmed its forecasts, lowering global to 4.0% from 4.1% in 2011 and to 4.4% from 4.6% in 2012. Goldman's US forecast for 2011 is down to 1.7% from 1.8% and for 2012 down to 2.1% from 3.0%. Goldman nevertheless sees 1.4% growth in Europe in 2012.

It is worth noting that it wasn't until last week that Goldman Sachs decided to lower its end-2011 target for Australia's ASX 200 to 4450 from 5125, adding a bear case “recession scenario” target of 3600. FNArena has been suggesting since early this year that broker targets of up to 5500 for year-end were simply too high in comparison to falling corporate earnings forecasts, and it's taken this long for the equity strategists to join the party. Now Goldmans is giving us a year-end target range of 3600-4450.

Cheers.

The point here is that brokers are always behind these macro forecast curves and never in front of them, often revising only each quarter or more. Looking at the new forecasts above there are indeed some big cuts – Morgan taking Europe 2012 to 0.5% from 1.2%, for example, and Goldmans taking US 2012 to 2.1% from 3.0%, but to see MS drop its 2011 global to 3.9% from 4.2% at this stage of the game, all one can really say, as is often the case, is “Thanks Scoop”.

When the IMF finally lowers its global forecasts, the market will be a screaming buy. 

In the meantime, fear is back. Gold jumped US$35.90 to US$1825.90/oz last night, despite the US dollar index rising 0.6% to 74.22. Silver was up 1%. The Aussie has fallen one and a half cents to US$1.0388. The VIX volatility index in the US jumped 35% to 42 (it traded at 48 last week).

Commodities were routed. Base metals all fell 2-3% in London with the exception of tin, which fell 6%. Brent oil dropped US$3.61 to US$106.99/bbl, while West Texas plunged US$5.85 to US$81.73/bbl.

The SPI Overnight is down 103 points or 2.4%.

So is it a case of here we go again? Well, it was nearly two weeks ago now that I pointed out the realities of sharp stock market plunges. History shows that a sustained rally never begins from a sudden reversal after a sudden drop. There are always false-start rallies first, and usually they are followed by further sharp drops, often to even lower levels. Only when the market gets to the point of “giving up”, when the buyers just disappear and the market can do nothing other than drift down further, will we find the bottom.

Last night on Wall Street was not actually a selling rout. The Dow opened down 500 points and stayed around that level all day until the very death, when it rallied back 80 points. Volumes were decent for a summer's day, but not much more than half what they were on the heady days last week. All that really happened was that the buyers disappeared, at least until the very end. One might call it an orderly adjustment for renewed fear. Others would call it an overreaction in stocks, pointing to more benign bond markets responses.

Either way, while the dust had settled somewhat this week after last week, the nervousness had not dissipated. That nervousness remains entrenched for now, and the script is still playing out.

Earnings season highlights in Australia today include reports from Billabong ((BBG)), Fortescue ((FMG)), QBE ((QBE)) and Santos ((STO)). ANZ Bank ((ANZ)) will complete the Big Four updating the market with its own trading update today.

Rudi will be appearing on the BRR network's Roundtable panel at 3pm (brr.com.au).

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

The volatility in equity markets in recent sessions has had a noticeable impact on broker ratings, as the FNArena database saw 42 ratings upgrades (unusually high) compared to just six downgrades in the past week. Total Buy recommendations from the eight brokers contained in the database now stands at 54.97%, up from 53.2% last week.

Among those enjoying upgrades in ratings were Oakton ((OKN)), following a profit result that while weak offered some evidence of a turnaround in the key Victorian market. Coca-Cola Amatil ((CCL)) also enjoyed some upgrades post its interim earnings result, reflecting defensive earnings growth and an improved valuation following market weakness.

An improved valuation following recent share price weakness sparked ratings increases for Transurban ((TCL)), while a better than expected result from Domino's Pizza ((DMP)) generated upgrades as brokers factor in further strong earnings growth in coming years. Others to receive upgrades during the week include Extract Resources (EXT)) and Navitas ((NVT)). 

A potential takeover from major shareholders Rio Tinto ((RIO)) and Mitsubishi have caused brokers to downgrade ratings on Coal and Allied ((CNA)), price targets also being adjusted to reflect the implied value of the proposal. 

Refinancing concerns are behind a downgrade in rating for The Reject Shop ((TRS)), while an initiation of coverage on Sandfire Resources ((SFR)) at Underweight has brought down average ratings on the company.

In terms of price targets, increases to forecasts for Domino's Pizza translated into higher price targets, while an increase in reserves at Extract saw one broker lift its target for that stock. Greater confidence in earnings in the coming year have resulted in a price target increase for Programmed Maintenance Services ((PRG)), while Transurban saw some modest increases to targets post its profit result.

On the other side of the ledger, Harvey Norman delivered lower 4Q sales and this was met by some cuts to earnings estimates and price targets, though there were no associated changes in ratings. Myer ((MYR)) suffered by association in terms of targets and estimates being reduced.

Tough retail conditions also saw cuts to targets for The Reject Shop, while a more significant downgrade in target for Oakton ((OKN)) by one broker offset some modest target increases elsewhere. Difficult market conditions have seen targets trimmed for Stockland ((SGP)), while a somewhat lower quality result has seen cuts to both earnings estimates and targets for Bendigo and Adelaide Bank ((BEN)). 

Changes to forex assumptions translated into higher earnings estimates for Aquila Resources ((AQA)) and Paladin ((PDN)), while estimates for Mount Gibson ((MGX)) were adjusted following a solid full year earnings result.

With BlueScope ((BSL)) announcing some writedowns brokers have responded by cutting earnings estimates, while Duet Group ((DUE)) announced a capital raising during the week and this has also seen changes to earnings forecasts as models are adjusted accordingly.

A weak outlook has resulted in cuts to estimates for Computershare ((CPU)), while a disappointing price for the sale of US assets has caused brokers to adjust numbers for Charter Hall Office ((CQO)) lower. 
 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup
Suisse,Deutsche<*br*>Bank,JP<*br*>Morgan,Macquarie,RBS<*br*>Australia,UBS&b0=126,107,116,103,89,145,189,141&h0=74,91,79,113,90,87,112,101&s0=40,20,22,12,25,28,6,7" style="border-bottom: #000000 1px solid; border-left: #000000 1px solid; border-top: #000000 1px solid; border-right: #000000 1px solid" />

 

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 OKN 40.0% 100.0% 60.0% 5
2 CCL 38.0% 88.0% 50.0% 8
3 DMP 33.0% 83.0% 50.0% 6
4 LEI - 25.0% 13.0% 38.0% 8
5 EXT 33.0% 67.0% 34.0% 3
6 TCL 71.0% 100.0% 29.0% 7
7 NVT 14.0% 43.0% 29.0% 7
8 AZT 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 4
9 AQA - 50.0% - 25.0% 25.0% 4
10 CDI 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 4

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 SFR 100.0% 33.0% - 67.0% 3
2 CNA 80.0% 20.0% - 60.0% 5
3 TRS 75.0% 50.0% - 25.0% 4
4 AIZ 100.0% 75.0% - 25.0% 4
5 WEB 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 4
6 BHP 75.0% 63.0% - 12.0% 8
7 IPL 71.0% 63.0% - 8.0% 8
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 DMP 6.670 6.965 4.42% 6
2 EXT 8.600 8.767 1.94% 3
3 CNA 121.200 123.500 1.90% 5
4 PRG 2.326 2.361 1.50% 7
5 PNA 4.527 4.587 1.33% 7
6 TCL 5.793 5.864 1.23% 7
7 APA 4.358 4.383 0.57% 8
8 CDI 0.563 0.565 0.36% 4
9 CFX 2.001 2.004 0.15% 7
10 PDN 3.193 3.194 0.03% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 HVN 3.084 2.778 - 9.92% 8
2 TRS 13.350 12.375 - 7.30% 4
3 OKN 2.536 2.354 - 7.18% 5
4 SGP 4.021 3.734 - 7.14% 7
5 BEN 9.879 9.240 - 6.47% 8
6 LEI 23.701 22.630 - 4.52% 8
7 MYR 3.054 2.941 - 3.70% 8
8 CQO 3.493 3.381 - 3.21% 7
9 SFR 8.565 8.293 - 3.18% 3
10 BHP 54.444 52.910 - 2.82% 8
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 AQA 6.000 11.867 97.78% 4
2 TCL 11.286 12.157 7.72% 7
3 PDN 5.602 6.020 7.46% 7
4 DMP 34.050 35.250 3.52% 6
5 MGX 42.600 43.214 1.44% 8
6 AGK 103.000 103.913 0.89% 8
7 CWN 52.988 53.363 0.71% 8
8 CHC 21.533 21.683 0.70% 6
9 QRN 16.263 16.375 0.69% 8
10 BKN 71.167 71.417 0.35% 6

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 SFR 12.000 - 3.233 - 126.94% 3
2 BSL 8.371 6.786 - 18.93% 7
3 DUE 14.100 12.763 - 9.48% 8
4 CPU 59.182 54.409 - 8.06% 7
5 CQO 26.686 24.686 - 7.49% 7
6 AIZ 10.700 9.938 - 7.12% 4
7 OKN 21.820 20.480 - 6.14% 5
8 JBH 145.463 138.738 - 4.62% 8
9 ALL 11.013 10.513 - 4.54% 8
10 CDI 5.000 4.775 - 4.50% 4
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Heads – Let’s Buy!

By Greg Peel

The Dow rose 423 points or 4.0% while the S&P gained 4.6% to 1172 and the Nasdaq jumped 4.7%.

History was made on Wall Street last night as the Dow closed up 400 points because never before have four consecutive sessions seen moves in excess of 400 points, let alone consecutively down and up. Even in 2008 the market found time enough to take the occasional breather. I've no idea what history tells us in percentage terms but I do know that in the dark days of 1929 the ticker machines were running several hours behind due to overwhelming volume, meaning no one much knew what had happened until it had.

Today we not only have instantaneous market updates readily available to all but we also have computers placing and withdrawing orders in microseconds and programmed algorithms that make the decisions, along with big players hiding transactions in so-called “dark pools” and mum&dad investors no longer spitting because they can't get their broker on the phone given they can trade on-line.

Volatility is most often prevalent in “thin” markets but despite some brief black holes both Wall Street and Bridge Street have fallen down into, and up into, this past week in intraday moves, volumes have been the heftiest all year and generally the heftiest since Lehman. So “thinness” is not the cause of the extraordinary volatility we are experiencing.

I would like to eventually see the numbers which determine how much of this week's activity can be put down to “high frequency trading” but the reality is HFT is not about size but about speed. The way I see it we have a large pool of cash which has been sitting waiting for a couple of years for “value” to emerge and a large pool of investments that have been bitten for a second time and just want to get out into cash. Views are polarised between those recognising that there is a lot less vulnerable leverage in the market this time around and those terrified of collapse in Europe and/or fearful of a recession in the US. This is what we call “a market”.

Normally in sharp up-days like last night there would be dismissive talk of mere short-covering, but last night a pick-up was noted in both “insider buying” (nothing illegal, just disclosed buying by executives of their own company's stock) and corporate buybacks, both of which suggest “value” views. Yet at the end of the day I just think there is a very large group who simply don't want to be either caught long, caught short, or miss out. The only certainty is uncertainty.

So why did the coin come up heads last night?

Rumours were unsurprisingly in the frame again last night. First of all the media outlet which first posted the “French downgrade imminent” rumour on Wednesday, with no source other than “a trader who wished not to be named”, apologised last night for their reckless journalism and withdrew the claim. And then another supposedly more substantive rumour surfaced last night suggesting European officials were considering placing a temporary ban on short-selling – as occurred in 2008 – in order to stem the sharemarket “run” on the European banks.

In a dose of reality, it was announced that German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president Nicholas Sarkozy will meet in Paris on Tuesday having each prepared plans for how ever the current crisis within the wider crisis can be addressed. Up until this week Merkel has been under constant fire from her opposition, the electorate, and even those within her own party over thought of providing further hand-outs to all those good for nothing Mediterranean types, but suddenly the complaint is now “why aren't you doing something?!” 

Wouldn't want her job for all the dollars in China.

This news was taken positively, despite the fact anything that might arise not only has to be agreed upon by the eurozone's two most senior leaders, but also by the leaders of all the members and the seventeen member parliaments. Should be a piece of cake – not. Expectation is that the EFSF (European Financial Stability Fund) will be bumped up from a trillion to two trillion, or something like that, and if you pass Go you receive 200 euros.

Also welcomed early on Wall Street last night was last week's US jobless claims number, which showed a drop in new claims of 7,000. Are 7,000 people really worth 400 Dow points? Well, the point was that the fall took the total to 395,000 and 400,000 is considered the magic number between rising and falling unemployment. The total has not been below 400k since April and economists had expected an increase last week to 410k.

Let's not dwell on the fact weekly jobless claim data are notoriously volatile.

So it was all this “good” news which caused the coin to come up heads last night, and in fact with about half an hour to go the Dow was up 560 points. Usually a last minute, 100 point sell-off would be considered ominous but Wall Street was happy just to book the 423. While the sellers might be genuine, they might also be HFT computers who bought early and never carry trades overnight.

When stocks go up usually bonds go down, and this week has seen no less volatility in the US bond market as it has in the stock market. Early this week Ben Bernanke told the market short-end bonds will not fall in price for two years, so the world bought three-years in the Treasury's Tuesday auction with their ears pinned back, despite the fact Tuesday was an up-day in stocks. Wednesday was a down-day in stocks, but the world was not nearly as keen on the longer-dated ten-years the Treasury had on offer. And last night was an up-day, so it was not going to be that easy for Uncle Sam to attract lenders on a thirty year time horizon. America might be good for its short term debt at next to no interest, but where will the once mighty empire be in thirty years time? Demand at the auction was woeful.

Foreign institutions bought only 12% of the auction compared to a running average of 40%. I can't recall so wide a variation in recent years. Suffice to say the thirty-year yield jumped 25 basis points while the benchmark ten-year yield jumped 19bps to 2.34%.

The euro and the pound surged last night on the supposedly good news out of Europe, which should have seen the greenback trounced, but following a statement from the Swiss National Bank that it would be taking “drastic” measures the Swiss franc fell heavily. The US dollar index thus only dropped 0.3% to 74.56. Gold was an unsurprising victim although not materially so, falling US$27.80 to US$1767.60/oz. Silver lost 1.7%.

They loved it all in war torn London and when stocks go up, so do commodities mostly. Aluminium rose 1% but all other metals were up 2-4%. Oil was also up, despite being up on Wednesday too, with Brent rising US$1.34 to US$108.02/bbl and West Texas jumping US$2.77 to US$85.66/bbl.

And all of the above means “risk trade on”, so the Aussie is up a cent and a half to US$1.0339.

So – yesterday in Australia we closed flat as a tack despite the Dow being down 500. You can add that one to my list of “never been seen befores” as well. Does this mean we must also close flat today with the Dow up 400? We could look to the SPI Overnight, which was up 72 points or 1.8%, but then on Wednesday night it was down 99 points.

I'll toss, you call. Or better still let's just go to lunch. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]