Tag Archives: Banks

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: French Banks To The Rescue

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed up 108 points or 0.9% while the S&P gained 0.9% to 1280 and the Nasdaq added 1.3%.

As the epic Greek Tragedy has played out over the past couple of years and evoked much wailing and gnashing of teeth, one group has been conspicuously silent – Greece's actual creditors. Overblown sovereign debt is at the heart of Greece's problem implying not only that Greece has borrowed too much, but also that someone has been silly enough to lend the profligate and ill-governed country the money. 

The ECB, IMF and leaders of the EU nations have spent the last two years trying to come up with the right solution, ranging from concessional bail-outs on the one hand to debt restructuring on the other. The IMF would have restructured Greece's debt in a heartbeat were it not for the common currency. The ECB says a restructure would amount to default under eurozone rules. Germany wants bondholders to, quite reasonably, take a “haircut” on their bad trade rather than German taxpayers having to foot the bill while France, quite understandably, wants to avoid any contagious banking collapse such haircuts might spark.

Yet all along we haven't heard a peep, publicly, out of the bondholders – the bulk of which are European banks, and French banks in particular. Perhaps they were thinking if they just kept silent hopefully a solution would be agreed upon which did not involve them losing any more money. Or perhaps they've been working furiously behind the scenes but we just haven't heard about it. 

In support of the latter scenario, last night President Sarkozy endorsed a plan drafted by a collective of French banks which effectively offers the haircut you have when you're not having a haircut. No doubt now concerned that Greece is sliding ever more inevitably towards default, the banks have offered to set up a special purpose vehicle which will reinvest half the proceeds of maturing Greek bonds into new 30-year Greek bonds and another 20% in “high quality” bonds as insurance of repayment in 30 years time. The EU needs European financial firms to roll over as much as E30bn in Greek maturities coming due over the next few years.

One presumes this deal will fit inside the ECB rules and will get the tick of approval from the IMF and Germany.

In the meantime, the Greek parliament is due to vote on the austerity bill needed to be passed to ensure the interim E12bn tranche required to get Greece through the next quarter. The vote will occur on Wednesday morning Sydney time, after the close of New York. The Papandreou government controls 155 seats of the 300 member parliament but it is understood four of Papandreou's party are unsure on parts of the bill. This implies, at this point of time, a passage of the bill by one vote. Is that enough to inspire confidence?

Well, Wall Street seemed to think so last night given it was happy to start buying again. The combination of the French solution and the Greek parliamentary numbers were at least sufficient cause for fund managers to look at the extreme amounts of cash in their portfolios and decide they better put some of it to work before the end of the quarter on Thursday. The Dow was up as much as 164 points (back above 12,000) before the traditional last hour fade.

Here's a question: Will the French bank solution provide an opening for Greece to reject the austerity bill, believing their creditors are now preparing to carry the can?

While European issues have been playing out, another factor has been weighing on global, and particularly US, banks. International regulators have been trying to settle on the amount of additional capital needed to be held by “significant” institutions, meaning those “too big to fail”, in order to avoid a repeat of the GFC some time in the future. All banks will now be required to hold 7% of tier one capital, but it was decided on the weekend that TBTF banks will be required to hold an additional 2.5%. The banks had been fearing an amount of 3% or more. The requirements need to be satisfied by 2019.

The news provided some much needed relief for US banks which have been wallowing not only in uncertainty over this requirement, and weak economic data at home, but also in the indirect impact feared were Greece to default and cause another Lehman domino effect. Bank of America shares led the charge, up 3%.

The economic data release of the session was May personal income and expenditure, which showed US incomes up 0.3% instead of 0.4% as expected and consumer spending flat as expected.

In recent times the US Treasury has had a canny knack of scheduling bond auctions on days when European fears send Wall Street tumbling and investors rushing for supposed safe havens, but not last night. With the two-year notes having traded at all time lows last week and Greek fears easing, last night appetite for US$35bn of twos on offer was weak and the yield jumped 5bps to 0.39%. Foreign central banks purchased only 22% compared to a running average of 33%. The benchmark ten-year yield rose 6bps to 2.92% and we are reminded that QE2 ends on Thursday.

The euro unsurprisingly rose 0.7% last night sending the US dollar index down 0.4% to 75.33. Australia's been out of favour over the past 24 hours however, with the Aussie down 0.5% since Friday to US$1.0444.

Gold is also currently out of favour and appears to be going through one of its regular correction phases, sparked last week by panicked selling for cash. It must be remembered that we're now in the middle of the dark zone for jewellery demand from Asia and gold typically pulls back at this time. Gold enthusiasts are known to sit back for a while and let it happen before piling back in later in the year.

Base metals movements were mixed and insignificant last night while Brent crude rose US$1.08 to US$106.20/bbl. West Texas was flat at US$90.86/bbl.

The SPI Overnight decided to flip yesterday's local trade on its head and rallied 49 points or 1.1%.

I have noted to date that the US June quarter reporting season will commence in a couple of weeks and that there are fears current earnings estimates are too high given recent weak economic data. However, those estimates have still not been revised and last night, after the bell, Nike reported its out-of-cycle result with a strong “beat”, sending its shares up 4.5% in the after-market. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Fund Managers More Uncertain About Outlook

- Fund managers more uncertain about market outlook
- Defensive assets favoured over growth assets
- Managers still relatively bullish on Australian equities
- Australian dollar expected to fall in coming years


By Chris Shaw

Global equity markets weakened in the June quarter, Russell Investments attributing this to ongoing political tensions in the Middle East and North Africa, continued European sovereign debt concerns, inflationary pressures in emerging markets and signs of a mid-cycle slowdown in the US.

In Australia there was the additional concern tighter monetary policy in China would impact on demand for Australian resources, while the stronger Australian dollar was also seen as an issue with respect to earnings for a number of companies.

In response to the June quarter performance, Russell Investments has surveyed fund managers to see how they are responding to current market conditions and where they identify opportunities going forward.

According to Greg Liddell, Russell Investments' director of consulting and advisory services, the growth theme which had dominated recent quarterly surveys reversed during the June quarter as managers became more uncertain about the outlook for global growth.

This left managers more cautious with respect to where they invested. Importantly, Liddell notes most managers remain confident the global economic recovery will continue, even though it will be at a much slower pace.

This caution meant mangers now favour defensive assets over growth assets, Liddell noting there was a sharp fall in bullish sentiment towards international shares to 57% from 88% previously. This was met by increased bullish sentiment towards Australian bonds to 19% from 3% previously. Sentiment towards cash also rose to 26% from 16% in the previous survey.

Bullish sentiment remains slightly better towards Australian shares at 62%, down from 78%, a level Liddell notes is relatively high from a historical perspective. Australian equities also appear to offer value, the survey showing only 5% of managers viewing the market as overvalued at present. This compares to 55% regarding the Australian market as currently undervalued.

Manager sentiment towards the small cap part of the Australian market has turned more bearish in the June quarter, Liddell noting a third of managers now expect a reversal over the next year. By way of comparison, 14% of managers were bearish on the broader Australia market. 

Managers are turning more positive on Australian real estate investment trusts, Liddell pointing out bullish sentiment towards this sector rose to 29% from 23% previously. This likely reflects the defensive nature of the asset class.

Among the other sectors, sentiment towards materials stocks fell sharply, with only half the managers in the survey now seeing value in the sector. The more bearish outlook reflects concerns of slower global economic growth and ongoing monetary tightening in China.

Negative sentiment towards the energy sector also increased to 31% from 24% previously, this given expectations of moderating growth and high levels of volatility. Liddell notes bullish sentiment towards the industrials sector was flat at 46%.

Bullish sentiment towards financials fell in the June quarter to 42% from 56% previously, Liddell seeing this as a reflection of knock-on effects from renewed European sovereign debt issues. 

With the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) viewed as turning more hawkish on rates, Liddell noted 26% of managers are now bullish on the potential for further increases to the cash rate. Despite expectations of higher rates managers remain bearish on the Australian dollar, negative sentiment rising during the June quarter to 62% from 56% previously.

Given a question of what will the Australian dollar be worth in five years' time, Liddell notes the majority of managers expect the currency will fall to between US81-90c. Not one manager expects the dollar to be above US110c in 2016.

Liddell notes potential catalysts for a weakening in the Aussie dollar identified by managers surveyed are a potential slowdown in China, increased risk aversion and delays by the RBA in lifting rates due to weakness in the non-mining sectors of the economy.

While bullish sentiment towards Australian bonds has increased this remains the least favoured asset class for managers, as lower yields mean returns over the medium-term are likely to be poor. 

The Russell Investments survey covers results from 36 investment management firms in Australia, the June survey being the 26th edition of the quarterly survey.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Westpac Shares Bottoming, Says TechWizard

By Rudi Filapek-Vandyck

The TechWizard likes to see divergence occurring at tops and bottoms. It helps him in determining when turning points are about to kick in.

Right now, he sees divergence forming on price charts for banks in Australia, such as Westpac ((WBC)). While this doesn't mean the shares will put in a rally today or tomorrow, it is likely a signal that a bottoming process is taking hold, reports the Wizard.

While the 20 moving average is still trending down, which is a negative, the Wizard report he starts to see value opening up in Westpac shares near $21 a piece.

The TechWizard is the pseudonym of Scott Morrison, whose experience in financial markets exceeds twenty years. Morrison operates his own website nowadays at www.techwizard.com.au. All views expressed are the TechWizard's, not FNArena's (see our disclaimer).

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

article 3 months old

Margin Pressure Impacting On QBE

- QBE revises down earnings guidance
- High number of large claims
- Margins remain under pressure given tough operating environment
- Brokers see little scope for short-term outperformance 


By Chris Shaw

The first half of 2011 has been a difficult one for QBE Insurance ((QBE)), as the company has faced an unusually large number of large claims given the number of catastrophes so far this year. Based on this earnings impact management updated the market yesterday, guiding to 1H11 net profit of US$660-$704 million.

While this implies a result 50-60% higher than for the previous corresponding period, the guidance was below market expectations. As an example, Deutsche Bank had been forecasting an interim profit of US$870 million while others had been around the US$750 million range.

Even allowing for the higher frequency of claims in the period, Deutsche Bank notes there have been offsetting factors such as higher investment yields and foreign exchange gains. This implies softer underwriting margins, which has been picked up on by most brokers.

On Deutsche's numbers underlying margins for the half have been around 12.5%, which is well below full year guidance for margins of 15-18%. While BA Merrill Lynch estimates 1H11 margins of 13.2%, RBS Australia suggests an outcome for the period of 12.8%.

While an improvement to 15.9% for the second half is anticipated by RBS Australia, this still suggests a full year margin of 14.5%. This would be a little below current guidance for margins for the full year of 15-18%. BA-ML agrees, estimating full year margins are likely to come in around 14.7%.

The updated guidance by management has seen brokers adjust earnings forecasts for QBE, with RBS Australia cutting FY11 estimates by 5% and Deutsche Bank by 8%. BA-ML had previously lowered estimates, so it has only cut a further 2% from forecasts. Estimates for outer years have also been trimmed by most in the market, but by smaller amounts.

Consensus earnings per share (EPS) forecasts for QBE Insurance now stand at US159.8c for FY11 and US179.2c for FY12. The changes to forecasts have been accompanied by some changes to price targets, with RBS Australia cutting its target to $19.22 from $20.07 and Deutsche Bank to $18.20 from $18.50.

The consensus price target according to the FNArena database now stands at $19.57, down from $19.72 previously. Targets have a reasonable spread, ranging from Deutsche at $18.20 to Macquarie at $20.77.

What hasn't changed is broker ratings, the database showing QBE Insurance is rated as Buy twice, Hold five times and Underperform once. UBS is among the Buys, continuing to see value in the stock at present levels despite currently unfavourable conditions.

The Hold view is well summed up by BA-ML, the broker suggesting there are few reasons to expect outperformance at present given interest rates are again trending down, the Australian dollar remains strong and there are the higher claims impacting on margins.

Deutsche Bank agrees, pointing out while at current levels QBE Insurance is trading at a 20% discount to its seven-year average 12-month forward earnings multiple, there is limited upside potential in the shorter-term.

Even while expecting recent acquisitions to add to underlying growth, RBS Australia also sees a difficult shorter-term environment for QBE Insurance. The broker suggests it will take a recovery in markets for the stock to re-rate, something not expected to occur in coming months.

Shares in QBE Insurance today are weaker and as at 11.05am the stock was down 61c or 3.5% at $16.67. Over the past year QBE has traded in a range of $16.09 to $19.60, the current price implying upside of around 18% to the consensus price target in the FNArena database.

 
Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Icarus Signal New Entries For Today

Daily update on share prices and consensus price targets.

By Rudi Filapek-Vandyck

Could there possibly be more to consensus price targets than initially meets the eye? I certainly think so. On occasion, consensus price targets converge with identified resistance levels in technical analysis and that is, for obvious reasons, where matters become very interesting. I have written about this in the past, see "Everything You Need To Know About The Banks" from March 14 this year.

My attention was again piqued this week after reading a technical assessment for Iress ((IRE)) shares by The Chartist. Iress is one stock that is constantly on my radar as it tends to trade close or above consensus price target by default. Investors who owned the shares throughout the years have done well, but the observed pattern suggests timing is more important than ever for those who don't own, but have the ambition to.

As clearly shown on the price chart below, Iress shares have tried four times over the past eight months to beak above the $9.40-$9.60 zone, and each and every attempt has failed. In terms of potential returns this translates into: investors who bought the shares towards the peak during each such attempt are today looking at no net gains, while others could have bought as low as $8.40 during the period, 10.5% below today's share price.

Iress is traditionally a high multiple stock, but still offers a relatively high dividend yield. At the current share price of around $9.29 (consensus target at $9.37) the Price-Earnings ratio (PE) for FY11 sits at 19.8 and this only drops to 17.3 on present consensus forecasts for FY12.

Implied dividend yields are still 4.4% and 5.0% for FY11 and FY12 respectively. If market expectations prove correct, Iress should continue providing shareholders with double digit growth in the years ahead. In a general context wherein forecasts are being cut and are likely to remain in a downward trend for months to come, it is not difficult to see why investors continue chasing the stock.

As stated in the opening sentences, there is a technical analysis angle to this story, with The Chartist reporting solid technical resistance lies in the above mentioned $9.40-$9.60 zone, so don't expect the shares to break above consensus price targets anytime soon. Investors might have to wait until August, when stockbrokers roll forward their models into FY12 to see those targets increase. That might be the signal that technical support might finally give in. In the meantime, expect Iress shares to swing in between close to target and above target, as the shares essentially have done over the past eight months.

For those who like to become a longer term shareholder: paying attention to valuation and timing can do wonders for future returns. The past eight months provide the classic example for this. Also, twelve months ago investors could have bought the shares for $9.29, which, again, would have led to limited investment returns over the period.

Another stock that has a similar story to tell as Iress is Monadelphous ((MND)). No surprise thus, Monadelphous shares have now -again- left the stocks that are trading close to targets, to join those trading above target.

Iress was joined by Nomad Building ((NOD)) -share price weakness- and by Spark Infrastructure ((SKI)) as newcomers on the list of stocks that have approached the vicinity of consensus target.

There are now 27 stocks trading above target.

Tabcorp ((TAH)) has landed in the Bottom 50, but this has more to do with adjustments post the demerger of Echo Entertainment ((EGP)).

Investors should consider the information and data are provided for research purposes only.

Stocks <3% Below Consensus

Order Symbol Current Price($) Consensus Price($) Difference(%)
1 IRE $ 9.35 $ 9.37 0.25%
2 NOD $ 0.10 $ 0.10 0.00%
3 SKI $ 1.28 $ 1.30 1.88%

Stocks Above Consensus

Order Symbol Current Price($) Consensus Price($) Difference(%)
1 MND $ 19.51 $ 19.23 - 1.45%

Top 50 Stocks Furthest from Consensus

Order Symbol Current Price($) Consensus Price($) Difference(%)
1 NXS $ 0.32 $ 0.49 55.56%
2 TAH $ 3.35 $ 7.92 136.42%

To see the full Icarus Signal, please go to this link

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: S&P 500 Breaks Support

By Greg Peel

The Dow fell 61 points or 0.5% while the S&P fell a more substantial 1.1% to 1286 and the Nasdaq dropped 1.1%.

Friday's weak US jobs number continued to resonate through Wall Street last night after traders spent the weekend contemplating the clear slowdown in the US economy. Speaking on CNBC this morning the president of the Boston Fed admitted the central bank had been wrong in assuming an ongoing modest recovery but was still expecting a better performance in the second half. As for QE3, the president suggested it was too early to consider new stimulus at a time when QE2 is due to expire. It will be a case of keeping a close eye on the data.

Which in a way is confirmation that QE3 would be implemented were the situation to weaken further, but if the Fed expects the second half to be better than the first then it is unlikely we will hear any QE3 talk for a couple of months at least.

The Fed was also in the frame on Friday night when a Fed board member outlined in a speech ways that systematically important US banks can carry additional capital requirements under the new Dodd-Frank financial market regulation act. Fears of increased bank capital reserve requirements had the financial sector leading the way down last night.

Wall Street was also under pressure from a euro which rose early but drifted back to the New York close. Euro finance minister leader Jean-Claude Junker suggested last night that the euro was overvalued and that the region needs a better exchange rate policy. It might be a vague statement at this stage but the German finance minister also threw fuel on the uncertainty fire last night by suggesting the second bail-out of Greece – largely agreed on last week – was not a given. If there are two things one can rely on regarding Europe, one is that disagreement and dithering rule the day and the other is one should always be wary of anyone called Jean-Claude.

The result was a 0.3% rise in the US dollar index to 73.98 which did not help oil's cause. Consolidating ahead of Wednesday night's OPEC production quota meeting in Vienna, Brent fell US$1.46 to US$114.48/bbl and West Texas fell US$1.43 to US$98.79/bbl.

The combined weakness in the large cap financial and energy sectors saw the S&P 500 fall in the morning session to below the previous “Libya low” of 1295 where technical support was assumed. The index rallied back to support, fought a battle for a couple of hours and then lost it, accelerating to the downside in the afternoon as technical stop-loss orders were triggered. Next stop 1275 for the tea leaf readers.

Gold was little changed at US$1544.80/oz but silver managed a 1% gain to US$36.78/oz. China was on holidays yesterday which affected low activity on the LME last night. Base metals were mixed with nickel and tin down 1%, lead up 2% and the others slightly positive.

The Aussie was steady at US$1.0716 and the SPI Overnight fell 31 points or 0.7%.

All ears will be on Fed chairman Ben Bernanke who is due to make a speech tonight, and any further hints on monetary policy tweaks will be highly anticipated. Before that we have to get past an RBA rate decision today, and it seems yesterday's lower ANZ job ads number, which confirms a trend now in reverse, was enough to kill off the last economist expectations of a rate rise. Unfortunately this means we'll probably get one. I'll stick by what I said on Sky Business on Friday and that is that a rate rise seems unlikely this month but I would not be at all surprised if we got one given the language of the last RBA minutes and the inflationary numbers hidden in a GDP report dominated by weather-affected exports.

So get set for 2.30pm today. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

UK House Price Risk For NAB

By Greg Peel

Morgan Stanley analysts note that while the recovery of housing supply in the UK remains relatively weak post-GFC, real household disposable income growth continues to be weak. MS is forecasting 150 basis points of Bank of England cash rate increases over the next two years from the 0.5% rate put in place in 2008 which is as yet untouched. There may be some pressure on mortgage margins which banks will need to absorb, but the outlook for housing demand is subdued.

From the banks' perspective, MS does not expect any loosening of credit standards or increases in allowable loan-to-value ratios to offset weak demand. Higher deposits will thus remain in place and with little relief on affordability the analysts see the equation as resulting in a 10% drop in house prices over the next two years.

This will affect higher impairment (bad and doubtful debt) charges on bank mortgage books and foreclosure recovery prices will be lower in a falling market. If banks choose to be conservative, higher capital requirements are likely. And bank funding costs are likely to increase, further constraining mortgage growth.

When the Australian banks reported last month National Australia Bank ((NAB)), being the only one of the Big Four with a UK business, provided no new news. Analysts took no news as good news given news from the UK is usually bad, and combined with strong mortgage growth in Australia following aggressive marketing, FNArena database brokers elevated NAB to top pick on a consensus basis.

UBS led the brokers in concern over a rather alarming increase in 30 and 60-day arrears on bank mortgage books sourced almost entirely from 2008 first home buyers who were armed with a big stimulus hand-out from the government and an RBA emergency cash rate. The RBA is set to raise again shortly (if not tomorrow) and the average house price in Australia has begun to tip over. While the housing market remains substantially under-supplied, there are growing fears Australia, too, will suffer a notable pullback in prices.

Not great news on either side of the world for the brokers' top bank pick.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Euro Disagreement To Weigh On Currency

- ECB resistance to Greek restructuring suggesting EUR downside risk
- A stronger USD would put pressure on commodity prices
- Even Aussie banks may suffer the fallout


By Greg Peel

Further signs of a slowing in the US economic recovery, further evidence of Chinese tightening measures having an impact, and even a new volcano are weighing on the minds of stock market investors at present. But none is more concerning than the seemingly eternal problem of peripheral eurozone sovereign debt. Since Greece came back into the spotlight yet again, Wall Street indices, for example, having been tracking euro movements with near perfect correlation.

It was not that long ago that markets were anticipating a second rate rise from the European Central Bank given evidence of rising inflation in the eurozone. The expectation that the ECB would outrun the Fed in the tightening game meant the world became long euro and short US dollars. Many observers, including FNArena, warned that ECB language had suggested a second hike was not a given, and that if that were the case a strong bounce in the US dollar was on the cards, which in turn would shake the commodity speculators.

And that's exactly what happened – no rate rise, the euro tanked, the greenback bounced and commodity prices plunged back to more fundamentally supportive levels. The next step was for Germany to suggest a “soft” restructuring of Greek debt, which brought a nod of agreement from the IMF.

Given that most of the market has long thought a Greek restructuring inevitable, there was a chance such an outcome would actually provide support for the euro. Uncertainty is a trader's biggest fear, and a quick resolution would also have relieved some of the risk of contagion through to Portugal and Ireland. But any relief was brief, because pretty quickly France voiced its disagreement on restructuring, and the ECB rejected the notion out of hand. Thus uncertainty has reigned ever since, and now fears over Spain and even Italy have entered the mix.

Greece is currently supported by an EU-IMF bail-out fund, so while Greek debt yields have blown out to total junk levels of 25% the government will not need to refinance via the market any time soon. But the EU-IMF assumption was that the bail-out would mean Greek yields would drift back down, not explode. Eventually Greece will have to tap into market funds.

And this is what has the ECB offering staunch resistance, because it will be the ECB left to carry the can. Officials suggest that a restructuring of Greek debt will scare potential bond investors away for years and that would mean the central bank would be left as the only source of Greek finance. At present, under bail-out conditions, the ECB is only “temporarily” accepting Greek debt as collateral.

CBA analysts are not convinced bond investors would completely abandon Greece but rather that a price could always be found. However too high a price would undermine current Greek efforts to reduce its deficit, including rapid implementation of government business privatisation. At present, Greece is doing all it can, in the face of political unrest, to satisfy IMF conditions. The IMF is due to review those efforts in mid June.

While uncertainty reigns in the meantime, CBA is expecting further euro weakness. An obvious target would be US$1.3685 (3% below current) being the currency's 200-day moving average and, just to excite the tea leaf readers further, would represent a Fibonacci retracement. CBA is suggesting selling into any euro rallies until the IMF report comes out or some resolution is agreed upon in the meantime.

If the euro does fall further, it implies further strength in the US dollar. More dollar strength would reassert pressure on commodity prices which are currently trying to bounce back after their big plunge, aided by bullish calls on oil and base metals from Goldman Sachs and others. There would have to be some solid fundamental support in the demand/supply equation for commodity prices to resist a stronger base currency, but with the US looking weak and China trying to be weak that's not a given.

The other consideration from an Australian stock market point of view is that which has been assisting recent weakness, being the Moody's downgrade of the Big Four bank credit ratings.

One wonders why suddenly now Moody's would chose to focus on the indirect risk from Europe, being an implicit rise in cost to the banks of offshore funding based on risk spreads widening globally, given it's over a year now since Greece hit the headlines and the Aussie banks are getting closer each day to their funding cost peaks. One can only assume the recent extensive blow-outs in peripheral euro-debt yields, along with uncertainty now raised over Spain and Italy, tipped the balance. 

Either way, Moody's has managed to undermine the global perception that the Aussie banks are among the strongest in the world, having proven their worth by making it through the GFC without too many injuries. Were the euro to fall further on ongoing Greek uncertainty, Aussie bank share prices may yet come under more pressure.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Solid Earnings Growth To Continue For Thorn Group

- Thorn Group full year result at top end of guidance
- Broader earnings base to support growth in coming years
- Brokers continue to see value at current levels

By Chris Shaw

Electrical and household appliances rental operator Thorn Group ((TGA)) yesterday delivered a record full year earnings result, the 40% increase in headline profit to $22 million broadly meeting market expectations. The result showed both top-line growth and an expansion in gross margins, reflecting "good quality".

Macquarie viewed the gross margin increase as stemming from gains derived from a stronger Australian dollar and some TV price deflation, which allowed for a reduction in the cost of sales. With rental rates likely to be adjusted to account for price deflation, Macquarie sees relatively flat margins for FY12.

Credit Suisse is also more cautious on the growth outlook for FY12, especially as there has likely been some product/price repositioning. These changes are likely to weigh on margins. On the plus side, Credit Suisse notes customer retention rates held steady in FY11, this while average payment per month per customer rose and the rental customer base broadened.

Looking ahead, Credit Suisse notes Thorn Group will enjoy a broader growth base thanks to the NCML acquisition, while increased contributions are expected from both Cashfirst and Rentlo. CashFirst is of importance as it has only now achieved a critical mass large enough to make any meaningful contribution to earnings. Losses from the BigBrownBox operations will also be removed given the closure of that division.

This leads to expectations of double digit earnings growth over the next few years, particularly as Radio Rentals increases its market penetration via the opening of new stores. Macquarie notes 5-10 additional sites are planned for FY12.

Consensus earnings per share (EPS) forecasts according to the FNArena database stand at 21.8c for FY12 and 23.9c for FY13, with Macquarie above this level given forecasts of 23.2c and 26c respectively. As RBS notes, earnings in line with consensus for FY12 would represent growth of a little more than 20%. 

Stockbroker Moelis is not in the FNArena database but is forecasting EPS for Thorn Group of 22.2c for FY12 and 24.4c for FY13. Earnings risk according to Moelis remains to the upside given the scope for additional bolt-on acquisitions and increased leverage from the opening of additional store fronts.

While Thorn Group shares have risen by 91% over the past year, brokers continue to see value. As Moelis notes, even allowing for the recent gains, Thorn Group is trading on an earnings multiple of less than 10 times for FY12.

Credit Suisse agrees, noting along with an undemanding earnings multiple Thorn Group also offers an attractive dividend yield. The yield is expected to be around 5% fully franked in FY12 and potentially as high as 6% in FY13, based on Macquarie's estimates.

The FNArena database shows a perfect three for three in Buy ratings for Thorn Group, while Moelis also rates the stock as a Buy. The consensus price target according to the database stands at $2.36, unchanged from prior to the profit result.

Shares in Thorn Group today are slightly higher, the stock up 1c at $2.09 as at 2.05pm. Over the past year Thorn Group has traded in a range of $1.105 to $2.30, the share price implying upside of around 12.5% to the consensus price target in FNArena's database.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Australian Bank Earnings Review

By Greg Peel

When FNArena provided a preview of the bank interim result season back on April 14 ("Australian Bank Earnings Preview"), ANZ Bank ((ANZ)) remained the leading choice amongst database brokers with a Buy/Hold/Sell ratio of 5/3/0. ANZ's point of difference is its Asian deposits which had helped the bank to a sector-beating net interest margin. Could that position be maintained?

National Bank ((NAB)) was second in the field on 3/4/1, offering potential reward from a turnaround in the UK in its toxic asset position but also thus the riskiest of the Big Four. Westpac ((WBC)) matched NAB on 3/4/1 with margins on the improve, albeit the St George lending book lingered as an issue.

Commonwealth ((CBA)) does not report on the same cycle as the others (but will provide a quarterly update shortly) but it was in last position on 1/6/1. Analysts felt that while CBA is strong and solid, it had also reached fair value.

This was the state of play back on April 14:

Last week as each of three reported, again the popular press was quick to jump on some big profit numbers. Politicians began to salivate ahead of the release of the Senate banking competition inquiry on the Friday. But for bank analysts, results were pretty much as expected on the headline numbers. The break-downs, however, were not quite as straightforward.

ANZ's profit was in line with expectation but strong trading profits (investment bank broking and proprietary activity) masked the fact that the bank's Asian-derived net interest margin advantage had slipped. For Westpac, quality was questioned given the level of bad debt provisions returning to the bottom line which masked sluggish improvement in net margin. It was NAB, nevertheless, which came out the winner.

NAB had been performing above-peer in the lead-up to the result season, with a strong push into mortgages aided by a clever, if not annoying, advertising campaign which took the Mickey out of the whole competition debate. But analysts were not convinced this momentum would hold.

Yet it did, and NAB's headline result beat consensus by about 5%. Its dividend payout was also better than expected, suggesting confidence from management. The quality of the result was nevertheless undermined somewhat by provision returns and toxic asset hedge profits, but what analysts liked is that usually NAB's toxic asset hedges lose money. There was no new news on the UK, which was also favourable given the news from the UK is usually bad.

NAB has now moved to the top of the table. There have been a handful of ratings changes from analysts in the lead-up to the results, and another handful following the results. ANZ has seen one downgrade to Hold from Buy and one to Sell from Hold and Westpac has seen three downgrades to Hold from Buy. On the other side of the coin, NAB has seen two upgrades to Buy from Hold and one to Hold from Sell. (And for good measure, CBA has seen one upgrade to Buy from Hold).

The table now looks quite different:

Looking at the sector as a whole, analysts have decided that while profit growth was reasonable there's not a lot to get excited about. Net profit growth was 7.1%, UBS calculates, but revenue growth was a sluggish 3.3%. At the end of the day, notes UBS, banking is a “GDP industry”. While the economy continues to deleverage, the consumer remains cautious and non-resource industries struggle along, expectations for credit demand growth are muted. House prices also seemed to have peaked for now, suggesting lower mortgage demand.

The difference in profit and revenue was provided by more returns of bad debt provisions, better than expected trading profits in a volatile market, and (in NAB's case) some asset revaluation. Cost control was nevertheless solid, albeit a lot is now being spent on IT improvements (with NAB looking at quite a task). Trading profits are not considered “quality”, because what the Lord giveth he can just as easily take away. Analysts prefer to see “real” profits generated from the business of borrowing and lending.

There are also a couple of issues surrounding those returned provisions. First of all, the March quarter was one of unprecedented natural disaster both in Australia (mostly, but not all, Queensland) and in New Zealand. The question is as to whether the inevitable increase in bad debts post-disaster are now known and contained, or whether there might yet be lingering pain. A couple of brokers picked up on another rather ominous development, with UBS becoming particularly concerned.

There was a sudden and significant jump in mortgage delinquencies in the range of 30 or 60 days in arrears across the sector. While 90-day arrears levels were not a lot different, clearly there is a risk they, too might be in for a sharp increase. The real concern stems from in which cohort of borrowers these delinquency increases came.

They were the 2008 first home buyers – those wide-eyed and inexperienced aspirants who could not previously afford a mortgage but suddenly could when Kevin Rudd handed out deposit boosters of up to $21,000 and Glenn Stevens chimed in with an emergency cash rate of 3%. The RBA has since raised the cash rate to 4.75%, most of the banks also added an out-of-cycle mortgage rate increase last November, and as noted, house prices have at least stalled and may now be teetering.

The RBA has hinted at another rate rise very soon. The offset is Australia's very strong employment situation, which should provide some comfort in terms of mortgage servicing capacity. But then not every Australian is working in the mines. Those in sectors such as retail, and anyone in small business generally, are finding it tough. And the strong Aussie dollar is also as good as another rate rise.

Is it, thus, a good time to be bringing back greater than expected bad debt provisions into the earnings line?

One thing remains fairly certain and that is little sign ahead of a big turnaround in credit demand. Business lending is starting to tick up just a tad, but it has been beaten down ever since the GFC and it's a long road back. The banks have generally managed to eke out improvements in local net interest margins, helped by that November rate hike and an easing in competition for term deposits, but funding costs are still rising while revenue growth remains subdued. It is not a climate of stock market outperformance.

Bank analysts have now rolled forward their models from the known interim results and FY12 has long been expected to show solid improvement over FY11. But with the exception of NAB, little in the way of target price changes have followed. NAB has seen its consensus target rise to $29.88 from $27.66, but ANZ's has slipped to $26.27 from $26.36 and Westpac's has slipped to $25.37 from $25.54 (CBA remains on $55.93).

NAB has become top pick in the hope that the long-awaited turnaround might now be underway. On that basis NAB is still the riskiest proposition, but thus showing reward potential. There has been a fair bit of general market price volatility since April 14, but a comparison of the two tables above show not a huge amount of movement in terms of upside to target. The exception is ANZ, which is now showing the widest (13%) gap yet has slipped to second choice on a net basis among analysts.

It may be a while yet before analysts again have much reason to alter those targets, so if the stock market does recover from the recent sell-off and bank shares follow along, FNArena will be watching out for a closing of the upside-to-target gaps which signifies fair value and little chance of more upside.

Which brings us to Friday's release of the Senate committee report into bank competition. One can only presume that focus group politicians would have been somewhat disappointed.

They may take heart in the report's suggestion of another, wider inquiry that should follow (presumably chaired by Sir Humphrey Appleby) but little else was contained therein to provide politicians with any told-you-so headlines. First up, the report recommended the ban on exit fees imposed by the government should be lifted.

The implication is not that exit fees should be allowed to run riot, but rather that the comprehensive ban was an ill-conceived, knee-jerk reaction. While the Big Four might see earnings slightly trimmed the regional and smaller institutions, with much higher funding costs, would be harshly penalised. In a sense, this works against the promotion of competition.

The other very notable commentary in the report was that which basically supported the banks against the politicians when it came to out-of-cycle interest rate rises. The report pointed out what one might call the bleeding obvious, and that is that the RBA's overnight cash rate actually has little to do with where the banks source their funds, ie from deposits and longer term (eg five-year) bond issuance. If the cost of borrowing rises offshore, then of course the banks are justified in raising their lending rates accordingly, the report implied, whether the RBA moves or not.

Outside of these clangers, the rest was pretty much as one might expect. There were a lot of exit fee suggestions, a lot of talk of greater disclosure (both of bank profit margins to the public and of greater explanation of borrower obligations). There were suggestions made as to how foreign banks might be enticed back alongside an endorsement of the Four Pillars policy.

There was also a lot of discussion on the subject of securitisation. Once upon a time, ie pre-GFC, the securitisation of prime mortgages was a major source of bank funding, particularly for smaller institutions. The funding cost generated from on-selling mortgage interest streams was much lower than that obtainable through direct borrowing of funds from offshore. The GFC made securitisation a dirty word of course, albeit there was little impact felt in Australia's highly regulated mortgage market. There was almost nothing in the way of “sub-prime” downunder.

So the securitisation market has been all but shut down ever since, impacting heavily on smaller institutions, which in turn affects competition (or lack thereof). It is no surprise that post-GFC borrowers all rushed to the safety of the Big Four, and that the aforementioned new mortgages were mostly absorbed by the behemoths Westpac and CBA.

The Senate committee thus went to great length to make suggestions for revitalising the mortgage securitisation industry, and even recommended extending securitisation across other loan classes. 

If these recommendations are acted upon, it will be a boost not just for smaller banks but for the whole banking sector, and lower funding costs mean lower lending rates for customers. But given the Senate has also recommended another, wider inquiry should follow, one can only conclude that any changes would come “in the fullness of time...” 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.