Tag Archives: Precious Metals

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Fedspeak Follies

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed down 17 points or 0.1% while the S&P was steady at 1939 and the Nasdaq rose 0.1%.

Looking North

The local market jumped on the BoJ bandwagon from the open yesterday in concert with global markets on Friday night. A 20 basis point cut to the Japanese cash rate to minus 0.1% from plus 0.1% is apparently the stuff of global recovery. The ASX200 was up 68 points at its high.

Whether or not anyone noticed, TD Securities’ monthly inflation gauge released yesterday showed a 0.4% increase at the headline in January to 2.3% annual, despite the plunge in USD oil prices. Core inflation, ex-energy, showed a 0.2% gain to 2.0%. The market remains convinced the RBA will be forced to cut its cash rate again some time later this year, if for no other reason than everyone else, bar the US, is doing it, but on these numbers there’s clearly no rush.

Nor would the state of Australia’s once destitute manufacturing sector provide cause for the RBA to panic. Yesterday’s local manufacturing PMI came in at 51.5. That’s down from 51.9 in December, but represents the seventh month of expansion nonetheless.

But for global markets there’s only one PMI that matters, and that’s China’s. Beijing’s official manufacturing PMI showed a fall to 49.4 from 49.7 to its lowest level in three and a half years. This was sensational news, apparently. At least, it was if you were watching TV news broadcasts last night.

What isn’t sensational news for the popular press – probably because it all starts to get a bit complicated for the great unwashed – is that Beijing’s services PMI came in at 51.4. That’s down from 52.2, so there’s no denying China’s economy is still in slowing mode. But a major reason China’s economy is slowing is because Beijing is trying to transition China from a workshop-to-the-world to a domestic-based consumer of goods and services. To do this, one assumes the Chinese manufacturing sector would need to contract.

The Chinese PMI results took the ASX200’s gain yesterday down to 38 points at the close, from the 68 point peak.

And as an aside, Caixin’s independent measure of Chinese manufacturing PMI came in at 48.2. That’s a faster rate of contraction than the official measure, but actually up from 48.0.

In the wash-up, sector moves for the local market yesterday were relatively uniform with the exception of healthcare. The hospital stocks were down on Friday and bounced back yesterday, sending the sector up 2.8%.

Around the Grounds

Japan’s manufacturing PMI fell to 52.3 from 52.6, but that’s pre rate cut, while the eurozone was disappointing with a fall to 52.3 from 53.2 post the ECB’s stimulus kicker announced in December. The UK was pleasantly surprised with a better than expected 52.9, up from 52.1

Each of the above economies, and Australia, are at least seeing their manufacturing sectors expand. The US result showed improvement, but only to 48.2 from 48.0. The result represents the fourth consecutive month of sector contraction.

Love That Bad News

Which is one reason to assume the Fed will be in no rush to implement its second rate cut in March. Another reason was provided by last night’s release of US personal income and spending numbers.

Consumer spending in December was flat on November, despite incomes rising 0.3%. Savings have reached a three-year high. The personal consumption and expenditure (PCE) measure of inflation fell 0.1% in December to mark 0.6% growth for 2015. The Fed prefers PCE to CPI, and this is the number the FOMC wants to see at 2%.

US inflation has clearly become an issue for Fed vice chairman Stanley Fischer. Fischer was last year among the most hawkish of FOMC members, deriding the market at the time for assuming too slow a pace of Fed rate hikes in 2016. Last night he changed his tune, and admitted the market might be right. Global volatility is weighing on the US economy, and that is slowing the pace of inflation growth from previously assumed levels.

The Dow has opened down 167 points from the bell and was continuing to struggle when Fischer made his comments. By late afternoon the Dow was up 44, before settling down 17.

The initial fall was driven by yet another 6% plunge in the price of oil, which in turn was driven by the awesome power of the Chinese manufacturing PMI. And presumably the market is beginning to concede that co-ordinated OPEC/non-OPEC production cuts are the stuff of fantasy.

But between the data, and Fischer’s interpretation of that data, the outlook for the US economy is clearly weak. And that’s great news.

Meanwhile, despite Snowzilla attacking last month, the forecast in the US is now for a period of winter mildness, unlike the past two winters. Good news? Well not for US natural gas, which fell 6% last night. Kick ‘em when they’re down.

Commodities

West Texas crude is down US$2.13 or 6.4% at US$31.43/bbl while Brent is down US$1.95 or 5.4% at US$34.04/bbl.

Activity on the LME was mixed last night, and once again we are reminded that China shuts down for the New Year break next week and that means a late scramble to buy or sell material and to square up trading positions. So we saw aluminium and copper steady, nickel down 1.5%, lead up 1.5% and tin up 2%.

Iron ore jumped US$1.00 to US$42.50/t. This is likely to set the mining sector on fire today and spark talk of a comeback, but I’d be wary of the aforementioned holiday and its implications.

Weak data and Fedspeak has the US dollar index off 0.6% to 98.99 and gold up US$11.30 to US$1128.30/oz.

The weakness in the greenback has countered any China-related weakness in the Aussie, which is up 0.4% at US$0.7106.

Today

The SPI Overnight closed down one point.

The RBA will meet today and leave its cash rate on hold.

Navitas ((NVT)) will post its earnings result.
 

All overnight and intraday prices, average prices, currency conversions and charts for stock indices, currencies, commodities, bonds, VIX and more available in the FNArena Cockpit.  Click here. (Subscribers can access prices in the Cockpit.)

(Readers should note that all commentary, observations, names and calculations are provided for informative and educational purposes only. Investors should always consult with their licensed investment advisor first, before making any decisions. All views expressed are the author's and not by association FNArena's - see disclaimer on the website)

All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided. www.fnarena.com

article 3 months old

The Monday Report

By Greg Peel

Ground Zero

It was a stuttering session on Bridge Street on Friday as the local market struggled to establish any direction on the last trading day of what had been a disappointing month. One sector at least knew which way it was headed, with a 5% gain in energy off the back of the oil price rebound being the stand-out on the day.

There was some counterbalance from selling in the big hospital names, leading healthcare down 1.8%, but otherwise it looked like a weak monthly close at midday when the ASX200 was down 30 points. Then along came the Bank of Japan.

Having only a week ago assured markets there would be no dramatic move in monetary policy, the Bank of Japan shocked markets on Friday afternoon by dropping its cash rate to minus 0.1% from plus 0.1%. As Japanese banks will now have to pay 0.1% to park their money with the central bank, the move has been implemented to encourage lending into the economy instead. As to whether this is the magic bullet needed to get Abenomics back on the rails, well there’s not a lot of optimism across the globe.

But the move was certainly well received by stock markets. The Japanese Nikkei index jumped 2.8% to its close but beforehand the Australian market found the kicker it needed to carry the ASX200 back over the 5000 mark to close the month, as I had suggested on Friday morning would be the goal of fund managers in the session. The 5000 level is certainly ground zero for the local market – a centre of gravity so powerful we have ultimately returned to it every time there is any move above or below over the past 12 months.

All the Way with the BoJ

The BoJ rate cut also gave UK and European markets a shot in the arm, and that mood lost nothing as it crossed the pond to Wall Street. Underpinned by the week’s rebound in oil prices, the US markets took the Japanese rate cut as a major positive at a time the December Fed rate hike has been causing much consternation.

The Dow closed up 396 points or 2.5%, the S&P gained 2.5% to 1940 and the Nasdaq rose 2.4%.

Talk persists of Russia and Saudi Arabia agreeing to 5% oil production cuts. There are various reasons why the world is sceptical of this possibility, not least of which being a long history of failed co-operation between the two producing nations. But most importantly, it is the US which is creating global oil oversupply. With oil at US$30 a barrel, non-US oil producers have the best chance of affecting global supply reduction if, having come this far, they can just sit it out a bit longer and wait for a slew of underwater US producers to go to the wall.

If production cuts are implemented outside the US, pushing oil back to 40 or maybe even 50, then marginal US producers will hang in there and the problem will not have been solved. Oil would likely then go back down towards 20 again.

Oil prices stabilised on Friday night but there is no doubting the week’s rebound, to end a still woeful month, has given Wall Street some renewed hope amongst Fed rate rise fear and what is proving yet another disappointing US corporate earnings season. Energy sector losses have made net earnings look woeful but that aside, once again revenue growth across the US economy is sadly absent.

On the subject of Fed policy, Friday night’s first estimate of US December quarter GDP came in right on expectation at 0.7% growth. That’s down from 2.0% in the September quarter and 3.9% in June. The result might have met expectation, but on the basis of this trend, how could one see a central bank continuing on a steady tightening path? And for the third year running, snow is threatening to be a factor in the March quarter.

The GDP result was thus another outside factor in Wall Street’s rally on Friday night. It is hard to see the Fed raising in March. The BoJ has gone the other way, and oil has stopped falling. For now.

Commodities

West Texas crude was almost unchanged over 24 hours on Saturday morning at US$33.56/bbl. Brent was up US71c at US$34.74/bbl.

The BoJ’s move unsurprisingly sparked a big plunge in the yen and subsequently the US dollar index jumped 1% on Friday night to 99.58. This should have been bad news for commodity prices, but over in London, base metal traders were more heartened during the weak by the oil price rebound.

We are also now only a week away from that annual event that always has the capacity to throw commodity markets into a bit of a turmoil. Chinese New Year comes very early in 2016, beginning next week. There is always a scramble ahead of the break, which pushes prices up, deathly quiet during the week, and sell-off afterwards as life slowly returns to normal. The holiday also distorts Chinese data over the period which often causes distress.

You’d think we’d be used to it by now.

Copper rose 0.6% on Friday night but short-coverers sent zinc up 2.5%, lead up 3% and tin up 4.5%.

Iron ore was unchanged at US$41.50/t.

Gold was also little changed despite the big dollar jump, at US$1116.90/oz.

And the big rise in the greenback did not impact on the Aussie, which is steady at US$0.7080, given the counterbalance of a lower yen through the cross-rates.

The SPI Overnight closed up 37 points or 0.8% on Saturday morning.

The Week Ahead

Today is the first of February and that means two things: the first of the month brings the global round of manufacturing PMI releases; and we have now entered the local corporate earnings result season.

In China’s case, Beijing will release both the official manufacturing and services PMIs today. As we know from last month, these releases have the capacity to send the Chinese stock market into apoplexy.

For the US, it’s jobs week. I would suggest we’re probably now back into a “good news is bad news” setting on Wall Street, such that a better than expected non-farm payrolls result this coming Friday night will send US stocks south on Fed rate rise fears.

Before we get to that result, the US will see personal income & spending tonight, vehicle sales on Tuesday, private sector jobs on Wednesday, and factory orders, productivity and chain store sales on Thursday.

The Bank of England will hold a policy meeting on Thursday. What surprises might it come up with?

The RBA will meet tomorrow. No surprises are expected downunder. The RBA will also release a quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy on Friday.

Australia’ manufacturing PMI is out today, along with monthly house prices and the TD Securities inflation gauge. The services PMI is due on Wednesday and construction on Friday. We’ll also see building approvals and the trade balance on Wednesday and retail sales on Friday.

The first week of the results season proper will start slowly as always. Navitas ((NVT)) will report tomorrow, a small group will report on Thursday including News Corp ((NWS)) and Tabcorp ((TAH)), and Friday sees REA Group ((REA)) along with a couple of others.

Macquarie Group ((MQG)) will provide a trading update on Thursday.

Rudi will make his first appearance in 2016 on Sky Business as host on Wednesday, YMYC, 8.00-9.30pm and re-appear as guest on Thursday at noon.
 

For further global economic release dates and local company events please refer to the FNArena Calendar.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided. www.fnarena.com

article 3 months old

Upside For Gold?

By Jamie Seattele, CMT, senior technical strategist, FXCM
 


 

The last update noted that “1130 (2014 low and close to the 200 day avg) does loom as resistance for the [US$/oz] gold price. A break above 1130 would be viewed as a positive in what may be an attempt at forming a major bottoming pattern.” Clearly, 1130 is no joke for the gold price. Seasonals are positive into mid-February for the yellow metal but the 200 day average, (new) channel resistance, and the 2014 low all cluster around 1130. If gold has turned the corner, then 1100 should provide support.
 

Reprinted with permission of the publisher. The above story can be read on the website www.dailyfx.com at this link.

The views expressed are not by association FNArena's (see our disclaimer).

For real time news and analysis, please visit http://www.dailyfx.com/real_time_news

DailyFX provides forex news on the economic reports and political events that influence the currency market. Learn currency trading with a free practice account and charts from FXCM.

www.dailyfx.com

Disclaimer

Forex Capital Markets is headquartered at Financial Square 32 Old Slip, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10005 USA.

Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before you decide to trade the foreign exchange products offered by Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Forex Capital Markets Limited, inclusive of all EU branches, FXCM Asia Limited, or FXCM Australia Limited, any affiliates of aforementioned firms, or other firms under the FXCM group of companies [collectively “FXCM Group”] you should carefully consider your objectives, financial situation, needs and level of experience. If you decide to trade foreign exchange products offered by FXCM Australia Limited you must read and understand the Financial Services Guide and the Product Disclosure Statement. FXCM Group may provide general market information and commentary which is not intended to be investment advice and the content of this email must not be construed as personal advice. By trading, you could sustain a total loss of your deposited funds and therefore, you should not speculate with capital that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with trading in foreign exchange products. Foreign exchange products are only suitable for those customers who fully understand the market risk. FXCM recommends you seek advice from a separate financial advisor.

FXCM Group assumes no liability for errors, inaccuracies or omissions in these materials and does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. FXCM Group shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation losses, lost revenues, or lost profits that may result from these materials. This email is not a solicitation to buy or sell currency. All information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential and is only intended for use by the recipient. All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received by the FXCM corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient.”

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Programming Restored

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed up 125 points or 0.8% while the S&P gained 0.6% to 1893 and the Nasdaq rose 0.9%.

We Shall Overcome

There must be a few bruised futures traders out there in the local market. On Wednesday morning they called the ASX200 up 54 points and we closed down 60, and yesterday morning they called it down 45 and we closed up 29. In each case the SPI went with Wall Street and in each case that was the wrong call.

I did note in the latter part of 2015 that the typical correlation we’ve come to assume between Wall Street and the Australian market had become blurry. And fair enough too. Energy is, or at least was, a very big chunk of US indices and thus more exposed to the oil price. Talk was of the Fed raising rates and the RBA cutting. Australia is more directly exposed to China. Wall Street boasts a new world big-tech sector led by FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) that Australia lacks. US investors are excited over 2% dividend yields, here we like at least 6%, fully franked.

The other feature of late 2015 was that whenever the ASX200 dipped below 5000, it didn’t stay there very long. The biggest threat to this near certainty came earlier this month when we dropped below 4900 on the oil price scare, but yesterday we finished back at 4976 after a defiant rally and yet oil is ten bucks lower now than in December. Or 25%.

So clearly there was some technical trading going on yesterday, and perhaps a belief that we do not simply have to follow Wall Street in lockstep. Wednesday night was all about Fed speculation and the heightened volatility that always features on Fed statement days.

Meanwhile, another feature of 2015 was a local market split in two – the big caps of mining, energy, banks and the telco which were bleeding, and a raft of high-flying small caps cashing in on a 21st century world and/or the rise of middle class China. Blackmores comes to mind, the suite of milk/cheese stocks, anything to do with the ageing population, and also bling peddler Lovisa ((LOV)). Yesterday Lovisa pre-released slightly disappointed first half numbers and was carted 35%.

Caveat emptor.

Back to Oil

Statistics might prove me wrong but I would hazard a guess and say Wall Street more often than not moves in the opposite direction on the day after a Fed statement release than it did on the day. Typically the market, or perhaps more realistically the computers, overreact in those last two hours of trade.

Once the dust of fierce debate over just what the implications of yesterday’s Fed statement really settled, one might conclude the implication was that there may be another hike in March, or maybe not. That’s not news, so back to business. Wednesday night was the first session in 2016 that Wall Street did not trade in direct correlation to the oil price. The oil price rallied strongly on Wednesday night, and rallied again last night.

So there we have two reasons Wall Street was up last night, and we can throw in a strong rally from Facebook after a Street-beating earnings result. The night before Apple did the opposite, and as I write Amazon has just released its report and has disappointed.

Rumours continue that OPEC and non-OPEC are ready to hook up for a co-operative cut in oil production. Last night’s suggestion was that Saudi Arabia and Russia were in talks to do just that. That rumour has since been denied. And seriously, can you see Vlad cutting Russia’s prime source of revenue, when the country’s economy is bleeding, when it is US production that is the global swing factor?

The denial did bring what had been soaring oil prices back down to earth in the session but West Texas is still trading 5% higher as we speak.

Back in the real world, Wall Street had forecast US durable goods orders to have fallen 0.6% in December but they fell 5.1%. Taking out lumpy transport, orders fell 1.2% when 0.1% was expected. Economists are now reeling in their expectations for tonight’s first estimate of US December GDP. But Wall Street didn’t seem too fussed.

Commodities

West Texas is up US$1.71 at US$33.59/bbl and Brent is up US$1.35 at US$34.03/bbl.

January is the month in which Australian resource sector companies post their December quarter production and sales reports and this week has seen a late rush. So amidst all the commodity price horrors, actual numbers have influenced the recent ups and downs of those beaten-down resource names. Yesterday Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) jumped 4%, for example.

We shall soon be seeing those same companies' half or full-year earnings reports, so February may again bring share price movements not specifically related to overnight commodity price shifts.

In the meantime, the US durable goods orders shock weighed on the LME, turning base metal prices around after a couple of days of rallies. Lead was relatively unchanged but aluminium, copper and nickel fell just under 1% and tin and zinc lost over 2%.

Iron ore rose US20c to US$41.50/t.

Gold’s little run, steeped in Fed speculation, came to an end last night. It’s down US$12.50 at US$1115.00/oz despite the US dollar index being down 0.4% at 98.56.

If the Fed doesn’t raise in March, the Aussie carry trade will remain more valuable. The Aussie is up 0.8% at US$0.7084.

Today

The SPI Overnight closed up 14 points or 0.3%. On recent form, this would suggest we’ll be down today, but it is the last trading day of a very bad month so I’d suggest a close above 5000 on that basis alone.

Australia’s December quarter wholesale inflation numbers are out today along with monthly private sector credit. All eyes will be on the Bank of Japan’s policy meeting today – the first since the Fed rate hike.

And Wall Street will hold its breath for the first estimate of US December quarter GDP. The market is tipping 0.7% growth, down from 2.0% in the September quarter.

On the local bourse, Origin Energy ((ORG)) will lead out another bunch of resource sector production reports while Orica ((ORI)) will hold its AGM.
 

All overnight and intraday prices, average prices, currency conversions and charts for stock indices, currencies, commodities, bonds, VIX and more available in the FNArena Cockpit.  Click here. (Subscribers can access prices in the Cockpit.)

(Readers should note that all commentary, observations, names and calculations are provided for informative and educational purposes only. Investors should always consult with their licensed investment advisor first, before making any decisions. All views expressed are the author's and not by association FNArena's - see disclaimer on the website)

All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided. www.fnarena.com

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Let’s Talk Rates

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed down 222 points or 1.4% while the S&P fell 1.1% and the Nasdaq dropped 2.2% thanks to Apple’s weak result.

Central Bank One

The futures market clearly got it very wrong yesterday morning, calling the local market up 54 points. It was no doubt a call based on the oil rebound and Wall Street’s subsequent rally, but after the ASX200 put on 90 points in thin trade on Monday, it did seem ambitious.

As it was Bridge Street simply opened lower from the bell and was down 40 points mid-morning. Bold traders stepped in to send the index back up to be only around 15 points down on the session, but then the CPI result was released.

Australia’s headline CPI rose 0.4% in the December quarter to a 1.7% annual rate, beating 0.3% expectations. Underlying (core) inflation rose 0.5% to 2.0%, to sit at the bottom end of the RBA’s comfort zone. At the headline, a 5.7% fall in the oil price, tempered by the lower Aussie, was balanced out by higher import prices, driven by the lower Aussie.

The fact the ASX200 spent the afternoon falling steadily to be down 60 points at the close suggests the market was disappointed with stronger inflation numbers, which imply the RBA will be in no hurry to implement another rate cut despite the obvious impact of lower commodity prices on the Australian economy. Falls were relatively uniform across the major sectors except for one clear stand-out – energy – which fell 2.3% against the market’s 1.2%.

It’s not often oil goes up 5% overnight and the local energy sector falls 2%, but it was all about a disappointing quarterly production and sales report from gas major Oil Search ((OSH)), arguably the best of the bad bunch when one looks at Australia’s LNG hopefuls. Oil Search fell 4.6%.

The Aussie dollar jumped up as high as 70.8 on the CPI results, which is also discouraging for large parts of the market, but it has since fallen overnight to be only up 0.2% over 24 hours at US$0.7027.

Economists have now pushed their consensus forecast for the next RBA rate cut out to August from June.

Central Bank Two

There’s a strong argument to suggest the Fed would never, in isolation, have raised its cash rate in December, given prevailing economic conditions, but for the fact it had been talking about a hike for so, so long and the markets had become so, so frustrated with the central bank’s procrastination. Just get it over and done with, the markets screamed. And so it was.

The Fed had upset Wall Street by holding off in September following an August sell-off sparked by a collapsing Chinese stock market and falling commodity prices. The Fed raised in December, and what has happened since?

The implication when the Fed made its move is that a tightening cycle had begun that would see subsequent hikes in 2016. Typically these would be quarterly, although the Fed was at pains to point out the cycle would be “gradual”. Gradual or not, Wall Street debate turned to whether or not there will be a second rate rise in March. Given what has occurred in January, the market was looking to last night’s statement for clarification on the Fed’s rate rise timing.

Of course the one thing you will never get from a central bank is something called “clarification”. Last night’s statement did not say “We will not hike in March”. Therefore, it was left to the market to read between the lines of the rhetoric and attempt to gauge the Fed’s thinking. And guess what – there is complete disagreement.

The Fed statement was balanced between pointing out just how strong the US labour market is, and just how worrying just about everything else is. The US economy clearly slowed in the December quarter (first GDP result out tomorrow night). The global economy is slowing (China). The Fed is no longer so confident inflation will rise as was expected (oil). Markets are volatile. All up, the FOMC no longer believes the risks are “balanced”. This, in itself, should imply no March rate rise. If only if it wasn’t for that very strong assessment of the labour market.

So we might conclude the statement was on the “dovish” side, but with a caveat. In other words, the Fed will decide whether to raise in March in March, not in late January.

Why did Wall Street fall? Was it (a) because the Fed did not assure there would be no March rate rise; (b) because the Fed now seems quite worried for the US economy; or maybe even (c) Wall Street wants a rate rise and may not get one. All three arguments were being bandied about last night.

Two days back and it's 2015 all over again. Shoot me.

Commodities

Last night proved to be the first night in 2016 the US stock markets did not move in lockstep with the oil price. Oil prices rose ahead of the Fed statement release and fell back somewhat thereafter, but West Texas is still up US62c or 2% at US$31.88/bbl and Brent is up US$1.05 or 3% at US$32.68/bbl.

The US dollar fell on the supposedly “dovish” statement, but only by an inclusive 0.1% on the index to 98.91. (We note the US ten-year yield is also as good as unmoved at 2.00%).

LME traders were anticipating a dovish statement, and thus a weaker greenback, in again buying up base metals ahead of the release. Nickel missed out, tin rose 3%, and all others rose 1-2%. Fed statement releases always occur just after the LME closes.

To confuse the issue, last night was the last night of trade before the LME moves buildings, suggesting some squaring up of positions, and there were rumours a Chinese commodity fund that had been shorting copper last year was back in covering.

Iron ore rose US50c to US$41.30/t.

Gold rose US$5.30 to US$1127.50/oz.

Today

As usual, we really need to wait until tonight’s trade on Wall Street to gauge the true response to the Fed, given the “smart money” tends to stay out of the typically volatile last afternoon on Fed days. US durable goods data are also due.

It’s a busy day on the local bourse today, featuring a raft of resource sector production reports, with Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) the highlight, and earnings reports from Credit Corp ((CCP)) and Energy Resources of Australia ((ERA)) to remind us the February earnings season is nigh.
 

All overnight and intraday prices, average prices, currency conversions and charts for stock indices, currencies, commodities, bonds, VIX and more available in the FNArena Cockpit.  Click here. (Subscribers can access prices in the Cockpit.)

(Readers should note that all commentary, observations, names and calculations are provided for informative and educational purposes only. Investors should always consult with their licensed investment advisor first, before making any decisions. All views expressed are the author's and not by association FNArena's - see disclaimer on the website)

All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided. www.fnarena.com

article 3 months old

What Will It Take To Turn BHP Around?

-Yield elevated, even if div cut
-First half result could be positive
-Industry discipline improving

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

The Big Australian, BHP Billiton ((BHP)) is in a state of flux. The diversified miner is under pressure following continued weakness in its chief commodities, coupled with the effects of a disaster at the Samarco joint venture in Brazil.

Morgan Stanley, on upgrading to Overweight on the stock, received a number of surprised responses from investors suggesting its decision may be premature. The broker is not the only one with a positive rating. There are five Buy ratings on FNArena's database, with two Hold and one Sell.

Essentially, the questions centre on just how long the current downturn will last and whether there will be another step down in commodity prices. Also, what is required to induce a turnaround?

The broker does not back away from its view on the stock, assessing it would still trade on an elevated yield even after the dividend is cut by 40%, while the shares are already pricing in the the US$8-9bn in lost value related to Samarco.

Moreover, BHP does not have a problem with its balance sheet, Morgan Stanley maintains, and investments are likely to be reduced to fit in with the available cash. The broker suggests that, while its view may appear contrarian in light of the potential for downgrades to earnings forecasts, the heightened discussion surrounding the stock signals that value is becoming apparent.

The broker anticipates the first half result in February could be a positive event if it confirms that operating costs and capex are being reduced and there is a strategy to address the shortfall in free cash flow relative to the existing dividend.

Most brokers expect the dividend will be cut and re-based. UBS expects a 50% reduction and observes the company is encouraging internal competition for capital to ensure the best returns on investments are made. The broker maintains the initiatives to reduce costs and capex in 2016 are positive aspects for shareholders.

Macquarie accepts the company's commitment to protecting its balance sheet and assumes the progressive dividend is re-based by 50%, but at the FY16 results, sticking with a Neutral rating.

Credit Suisse maintains an Outperform rating and notes that with US capex under review and to be updated at the interim results, reductions are likely to be primarily in the petroleum division where there is current capex guidance of $2.9bn, including $1.4bn in shale spending allocated for FY16.

In terms of the industry outlook, UBS expects prices for key commodities will remain subdued over the next few years but finds some evidence the mining industry is starting to operate in a more disciplined way, which bodes well for the longer-term supply/demand outlook.

The broker's upside case for BHP assumes a 10% increase to commodity price forecasts and a 10% decrease to the Australian dollar/US dollar rate into perpetuity. The downside case assumes a 10% decrease to commodity price forecasts and a 10% increase to the FX rate into perpetuity.

Morgan Stanley sets its price target at $22.50, as a weighted average of its bull, base and bear cases. The bull case, with a $36.00 target, implies 50% of free cash flow is reinvested at a 20% return for five years, with Jansen potash valued using a discounted cash flow model rather than at book, and Samarco re-starts, receiving US$1bn in fines.

The bear case, with a $13.20 target, implies the market loses even more faith in the stock, the Jansen potash project proves worthless, Samarco does not re-start and BHP incurs a share of fines amounting to US$5bn. FNArena's database has a consensus target of $19.98, signalling 29.4% upside to the last share price.

See also Prepare For The BHP Billiton Dividend Cut on January 21 2016.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: And We’re Back, At 5000

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed up 282 points or 1.8% while the S&P gained 1.4% to 1903 and the Nasdaq added 1.1%.

Happy New Year

And here we are, back at that familiar level of 5000 for the ASX200. When I left for my break just before Christmas we were at 5140, so clearly it’s been a quiet January.

No?

Fair enough. One could have been holidaying on a rock in the ocean and still not managed to avoid the news the Chinese stock market had again collapsed and the benchmark oil price had fallen to US$26 a barrel.

In the former case, the Chinese stock market itself is basically a joke and realistically not much of an indicator of the true Chinese economy but the sell-off was triggered by weak data. That said, I imagine the 2015 GDP result of 6.9% was seen as reasonable, if it can be trusted. I see this morning the head of China’s Bureau of Statistics is now up on supposed corruption charges.

In the latter case, it must be said there were plenty of calls for oil in the twenties as we headed into Christmas, and so it came to pass. The good news is that we will now see the long assumed disappearance of smaller, high-cost US producers, thus meaningfully reducing supply. Had oil continued to hover around US$40, the story could have dragged on all through 2016.

The bad news is we have now seen the first trickle of small US banks getting into trouble over their loans to said oil producers, with Texas being the unsurprising starting point. As to just how bad this story can get is as yet unknown, but it is unlikely to impact on the major US banks and is not, alone, the stuff of another GFC.

While locally the focus tends to be on China, one doesn’t have to look far to see what’s been driving Wall Street in 2016. The S&P500 has to date registered 97% correlation with the WTI oil price. Earnings season has begun in the US but that doesn’t seem to matter much right now. Tonight brings the first Fed rate decision post the December hike, but nothing untoward is expected.

Shortly the local market will enter the February result season, and that will no doubt tell a tale. In the meantime, here we are at 5000, again.

Wishful Thinking?

Two or three times late in 2015 there was talk from OPEC officials of possibly conceding to production cuts. Those officials tended to be non-Saudi, and each time a Saudi official quashed expectations with a largely “She’ll be right mate” attitude, while Saudi Arabia continued to pump oil as fast as it could.

Last night’s latest production cut talk came from Kuwait’s OPEC governor, who suggested OPEC would be willing to cooperate with non-OPEC members if non-OPEC members were willing to do the same. Such members include Russia and Brazil, who are bleeding heavily, but also includes the US, which is the heart of the problem.

The chances of the US agreeing to sanctioned production cuts are zero, so it’s all just pie in the sky. Meanwhile, one would hardly expect Iran to finally return to oil exporting and immediately take a haircut. And the history of OPEC suggests production cuts, while always agreed to, are never adhered to. The only way global oil production can be reduced is through natural selection. The oil price will only ever go back to US$40 once a lot of the marginal production in North America is idled once and for all.

And this is what is likely to happen in 2016.

In the meantime, West Texas is up US$1.36 or 4.9% at US$31.26/bbl and Brent is up US$1.53 or 5.11% at US$31.63/bbl.

As a result, Wall Street rallied overnight. There were a couple of positive earnings results in the mix to help things along, but basically it was just that 97% correlation.

Commodities

Outside of oil, there were some solid moves up in other commodity prices. The usual short-covering and technical trading were cited on a volatile LME for snap-back rallies in base metal prices. Aluminium jumped a percent, copper, lead and nickel rallied around 2%, tin was up 3% and nickel almost 5%.

Iron ore fell US30c to US$40.80/t.

Gold also went for a run, up US$14.30 at US$1122.20/oz despite the US dollar index being only 0.3% weaker at 99.04.

The Aussie is up 0.9% at US$0.7013.

Today

The SPI Overnight closed up 54 points or 1.1%.

Today sees the release of the local CPI numbers for the December quarter, which will no doubt fuel debate about whether or not the RBA will be back in cutting mode in 2016.

And the other endless debate will also rage in 2016. Not of when the first Fed rate hike will be, but when the second rate hike will be. And the third… The Fed will release its first statement for 2016 tonight.

Happy New Year. I hope it’s a good one.
 

All overnight and intraday prices, average prices, currency conversions and charts for stock indices, currencies, commodities, bonds, VIX and more available in the FNArena Cockpit.  Click here. (Subscribers can access prices in the Cockpit.)

(Readers should note that all commentary, observations, names and calculations are provided for informative and educational purposes only. Investors should always consult with their licensed investment advisor first, before making any decisions. All views expressed are the author's and not by association FNArena's - see disclaimer on the website)

All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided. www.fnarena.com

article 3 months old

Impairments Next For South32?

-Net debt reduction a key positive
-MS takes relative Underweight stance
-Impairments a substantial risk

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

Is the glass half full or half empty at South32 ((S32))? The company reported a decline in copper equivalent production in the December quarter, with weakness mostly derived from Illawarra coal and South African manganese.

Other assets were stronger performers and one of the highlights of the quarter was a substantial reduction in net debt. This indicates to Deutsche Bank that the cost cutting program is well on track. The broker believes the company is still positive on cash flow at current commodity prices and has compelling potential to cut costs further and improve the balance sheet. Deutsche Bank retains a Buy rating.

Credit Suisse, too, with an Outperform rating, notes the strong balance sheet is a key point of differentiation versus the company's peers and believes the stock is resilient at spot prices, with FY16 operating cash flow expected to show only a modest decrease of 0.9%.

On the other hand, with hindsight, Morgan Stanley believes it should have been more decisive when highlighting the spot commodity risk last year. The broker decides to downgrade to Underweight from Equal-weight, believing further downside risk exists if prices don't recover.

Morgan Stanley now has a contrarian stance but believes the trend has been implying a ratings downgrade over the past three months. The equity is trading close to the broker's price target (90c) so the move to Underweight is made more in relation to relative preferences for other mining exposures.

FY16 guidance was maintained, with the exception of Illawarra coal, where production was down 31% in the December quarter after a record September quarter. A further two longwall moves are planned for the current quarter at Illawarra. The company has noted challenging geological conditions have been encountered at both the Appin and Dendrobium mines.

South African manganese operations at Wessels and Mamatwan were suspended during the period and remain under review. UBS does not expect the company to exit South African manganese but rather look to consolidate and minimise operating costs. The broker was impressed by the cash flow in the quarter as it was amid a substantial fall in commodity prices, net of one-off tax gains, FX translation and despite some likely unwinding of working capital.

Looking ahead, JP Morgan expects lower capex guidance at the first half result and more progress on cost savings as well as details of the strategic reviews. The broker believes the reduction in the net debt position bodes well for the upcoming financials and South32 can ride out the downturn, although oversupply in key markets needs to be addressed before any recovery.

Macquarie has made some material cuts to earnings forecasts based on the production results and expects an earnings loss in FY16 with only modest profit in FY17. The broker also suspects cash flow will come under pressure now commodity prices have declined further, despite the benefit from favourable FX movements.

With a book value of US$11bn Macquarie considers South32 at risk of taking significant impairments at the first half result, should it start to factor in a sustained period of weakness in commodities or an outlook more broadly in line with forecasts.In the absence of an acquisition or recovery in commodity prices the stock lacks a positive catalyst for the near term, in the broker's opinion.

At most risk of impairment are Illawarra metallurgical coal and South African manganese, both of which are carrying negative valuation. The decision to exit the power sales contract in Brazil is also expected to require a revision to the carrying value of Alumar.

A risk, albeit much less, also exists for impairments to the company's larger profit contributors, particularly Worsley alumina. Macquarie highlights the fact Worsley is carrying a book value nearly US$2.5bn higher than the broker's valuation. Only the Cannington silver mine appears to be immune to a write-down risk.

FNArena's database has two Buy ratings, four Hold and one Sell (Morgan Stanley). The consensus target is $1.18, suggesting 23.4% upside to the last share price. Targets range from $1.45 (UBS) to 90c (Morgan Stanley).

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Prepare For The BHP Billiton Dividend Cut

-Urgent need to reduce dividend pay-out
-Escalating debt levels
-Issues will resolve but take time

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

BHP Billiton ((BHP)) production was largely in line with expectations in the December quarter, albeit the Samarco disaster during the quarter had not yet been factored into broker estimates. However, the issue of most concern is not production but the sustainability of the company's dividend policy.

The company alluded to its balance sheet in the report, reiterating an intention to protect it, which most brokers believe comes down to reductions in capital expenditure in the face of widely prevailing commodity price weakness... and, likely, a lower dividend payment to shareholders.

Macquarie suggests a re-basing of the progressive dividend will occur this year and most probably by 50% at the full year result in August. Citi is more blunt, suspecting an interim loss might be reported in February, with a reduction in the interim dividend to US30c. In FY15 BHP paid out $1.24 per share in dividends. Both Macquarie and Credit Suisse forecast FY16 dividends will be reduced by half to 62c per share.

Production was stronger than most expected in copper and metallurgical (coking) coal, offset by weaker volumes in iron ore and thermal (energy) coal. Guidance has been maintained for FY16 production across all commodities in the company's portfolio, with the exception of iron ore, which has been affected by the closure of the Samarco mine in Brazil after the dam wall failure. Macquarie considers iron ore production guidance is a stretch.

Morgan Stanley suspects the company will also have to catch up in the second half on the 3mt shortfall derived from a train derailment and power outage in the first half, or otherwise miss its renewed guidance in that segment. There is a slight change in the mix of oil production, the broker observes. Conventional oil capex has been maintained at US$1.6bn and oil exploration spending unchanged at US$600m. New full year guidance for US onshore production, on the back of a reduction to five rigs from seven, will be provided at the first half results in February.

Three were only two positives in the report, in Deutsche Bank's view – an increase in copper production and better-than-expected performance form the higher margin conventional oil assets, although conventional oil production still declined 5.0% quarter on quarter. The broker observes the company has a number of growth options but almost all projects require a large increase in spot prices to deliver attractive returns. Deutsche Bank acknowledges the commentary regarding protecting the balance sheet, which may signal a change in capital allocation will be forthcoming at the February results.

The company will recognise further provisions and write-downs in the range of US$300-450m in the upcoming first half results. Including these, as well as the production result, means Macquarie's underlying earnings forecasts fall 43% for FY16 to around US$902m. The broker expects BHP to report lower earnings than its competitor and peer Rio Tinto ((RIO)) for the first half.

Macquarie highlights the fact that BHP comfortably generated more earnings than Rio Tinto for each six months period over the past few years but in the second half of FY15 Rio Tinto's result was stronger. This is expected to continue to be the case for at least the next two years with BHP not expected to take back the lead until FY18. This means cash flow is superior at Rio Tinto, which also has lower debt. The gap in gearing between the two is expected to become significant, with Macquarie forecasting BHP's to peak around 30% while Rio Tinto's remains in the low 20% region.

JP Morgan highlights the urgent need to re-base the dividend, with a credit ratings downgrade a distinct possibility given the growing debt. The broker believes it will take time for the company to emerge from the mire, noting costs related to the Samarco incident are yet to be quantified. The company is expected to resolve the problems but, in the meantime, the stock is not expected to trade at full value.

UBS acknowledges the half year has been tough for the company, with its major commodities at multi-year lows making cash flow tight. Operating cash flow is expected to cover interest and capex but this broker also believes a cut to the FY16 dividend is warranted, also expecting a 50% reduction.

FNArena's database has five Buy ratings, two Hold and one Sell (JP Morgan). The consensus target is $19.98, signalling 38.2% upside to the last share price. This compares with $20.16 ahead of the report. Targets range from $13.00 (JP Morgan) to $29.30 (Morgans, yet to update on the December production report).

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Material Matters: Energy, 2016 Commodity Outlook, Metals And Steel

-Oil supply, capex cuts to feature
-Oil market re-balancing late 2016?
-Little demand growth for commodities
-Supply deficits but no price inflation
-Domestic housing, AUD supports steel

 

By Eva Brocklehurst

Energy

The market is concentrating on the future direction of the oil price as it breaches US$30/bbl for the first time in 12 years and UBS addresses the impact on the oil sector. Most companies, other than AWE Ltd ((AWE)), are expected to report declining quarter on quarter December revenue.

The broker suspects the quarterlies will concentrate on guidance for the upcoming results as well as cost reduction initiatives. Santos ((STO)) is expected to suffer a material impairment, while impairments for Woodside ((WPL)) and Oil Search ((OSH)) are likely to be restricted to mature assets.

All are expected to announce cost savings. The broker's key pick for investors willing to look through near-term weakness is Woodside and Santos in large cap stocks and AWE and Karoon Gas ((KAR)) among small caps.

A number of factors are weighing on the oil prices, including global oversupply, the expected increase in Iranian volumes and concerns over Chinese economic growth. Furthermore, UBS notes a lack of material supply decline in US shale, despite lower drilling rates. The broker expects the market will re-balance by late 2016 with a lack of investment in new oil supplies.

Deutsche Bank does not envisage a near-term re-balancing but expects 2016 US onshore supply will decline and, along with robust demand growth, support a second half rebound. Nevertheless, incremental Iranian export volumes are a headwind. The broker does not expect further non-OPEC supply declines until 2017, when oil markets should tighten.

While expecting low oil prices will not be sustainable for long the broker believes spot LNG will come under further pressure as new supply intensifies the oversupply situation in Asia. Key Asian LNG buyers have over contracted out to 2020. Balance sheet resilience is the key issue for oil stocks and the broker expects substantial cuts in capex to persist this year.

Commodities

Macquarie analysts are at the point where they suspect conditions will get worse before they get better. Assuming some macro economic stability in the second half oil could be the first to benefit while US gas could also make gains.

Among the metals, zinc and palladium offer the best hope of raw material constraint, in the broker's view. In contrast Macquarie recommends avoiding exposure to steel, aluminium, thermal coal, potash and nitrogen markets.

Something has to give, and the broker believes that something is supply. Despite barriers to exit, the supply response is starting, because of a lack of growth and sustaining capital. The broker cautions that supply reductions historically have only managed to stabilise cycles and demand growth is needed for more sustained recovery. With industrial production barely growing the year ahead offers little in that regard, Macquarie warns.

Metals

Ranking the demand for metals, Macquarie envisages in 2016 only cobalt and aluminium have demand growth above 2.5%. Cobalt benefits from its exposure to the lithium-ion rechargeable battery sector while aluminium has not had a sustained demand problem because its intensity of use is increasing in packaging and construction.

At the other end of the spectrum are tin, thermal coal, iron ore, steel and platinum. Of these, the broker suspects steel is now in a muti-year downtrend and could be at risk of matching the 3.5% decline seen over 2015. This means iron ore and metallurgical coal demand is likely to follow. Thermal coal's seaborne trade is expected to fall further in coming years and the broker believes the challenge is in displacing existing supply, which takes time, and during which margins are likely to be weak.

Platinum, meanwhile, is suffering from an “anti-diesel” effect, the broker observes. The majority of metals and bulks are expected to sustain significantly lower growth rates over 2016. The exception is gold, given the strong negative demand growth seen in 2014 from fund selling which has dragged down the five-year average.

Only aluminium is expected to be in surplus this year but Macquarie cautions, while deficits are expected and important for a market that is re-balancing, they alone do not convert to price inflation until excess inventories are drawn down.

Steel

Australian steel products are benefiting from earlier delivery of cost reductions and growth in domestic demand as well as a lower currency, Deutsche Bank maintains. These benefits should offset weaker steel spreads and deliver better underlying earnings for the half year reports.

The broker expects BlueScope ((BSL)) to benefit form the continued strength in the Australian housing market and the acquisition of the remainder of North Star, retaining a Buy rating. Deutsche Bank notes the company's coated products business in China is performing well.

Despite recent negative impacts from declines in scrap prices the broker also believes Sims Metal ((SGM)) is well positioned to benefit from upside in the US economic recovery. The company's recent downgrade to forecasts is considered largely the result of a competitive central region in the US and management has shown some evidence of delivering on planned improvements.

Meanwhile, Arrium ((ARI)) is not considered in breach of covenants at this stage but the broker is cautious, given the current volatility in the iron ore price.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.