Tag Archives: Banks

article 3 months old

A Very Busy Weekend For Europe…

By Kathleen Brooks, Research Director UK EMEA, FOREX.com

The main event this weekend was supposed to be the Franco/ German summit in Berlin; however this produced nothing more than another pledge to do everything possible to save the Eurozone in its current form. You wonder why Nicolas Sarkozy had to fly to Berlin leaving his heavily pregnant ex-supermodel wife at home; surely both Merkel and Sarkozy could have issued a joint statement that was then released via their respective press offices?

Far more interesting was news about Dexia. After a weekend board meeting that included Belgian and French officials, it was announced that Belgium would spend EUR4 billion to buy its retail banking arm, thus effectively nationalising the stricken lender that has had to be bailed out twice in the last three years.

But Dexia could be the straw that broke the camel’s back for Belgium. Brussels’ credit rating was put on negative watch by Moody’s on Friday, and for a country with GDP of approx EUR400bn and a public debt ratio knocking on 100% of GDP, a bank bailout couldn’t come at a worse time. Welcome to the new normal: sovereigns in the West can’t afford to bailout their weak banks and when they do it threatens to de-stabilise their credit ratings. So France got off lightly? Not quite. Dexia was a big lender to French municipalities and local councils, who borrow about EUR20 bn each per year (according to an article in the FT) so the French government is trying to hurry along a deal that would see a Treasury department and the Post Office bank to try and avert a funding crisis next year. Increasingly Sarkozy is needed at home, not only because of Carla’s delicate state, but also because major cuts to public services would be detrimental to his 2012 re-election campaign.

There were a few other things that caught my eye about the Dexia saga and the plan to sell off other assets and end up with a EUR100bn “bad bank”. Firstly, according to the FT report, some French muni debt that is already toxic will end up in said bad bank. Secondly, the sheer size of it. I am no banking analyst but there are plenty of other lenders out there who specialised in muni lending across Europe along with some of the region’s largest banks that hold huge amount of domestic government debt on their books. So bank re-capitalisations could also be far larger than the EUR 90 billion I have heard bandied about recently.

The only concrete things that came out of the Merkel/ Sarkozy meeting was 1, that a package of reforms to save the Eurozone will be ready by month-end and 2, that bank re-capitalisations are necessary. However, who can pay for them? France has already backed away from injecting cash into Dexia for fear of losing its AAA credit rating. We don’t yet know if the EFSF will be allowed to leverage-up so it can do the job. So there is plenty for Europe’s politicians to chew over and the markets to speculate on and this crisis still has the ability to disrupt the positive tone to markets.

Those who thought the Eurozone crisis was over the worst were dealt a blow on Friday evening UK time when Fitch came in and ruined everyone’s attempts to get away early and downgraded Spain and Italy. Spain was the bigger shock, however it was all the result of the banking sector. The state took ownership of a further four Caja banks last week, which will inevitably dent its finances. Add to this rising unemployment and you have the recipe for higher bond yields and CDS spreads when we head in on Monday.

It is hard to see an environment where the euro can sustain a steady rally and we may see it dwindle back towards the 1.3200 mark on the negative outlook for governments as they embark on mass bank re-capitalisations in the currency bloc. But what is bad for the sovereigns is good for the banks? Could we see bank stocks continue to rally even if their financial needs put their governments’ credit ratings at risk? Stranger things have happened, so all eyes will be on sovereigns and stock markets come tomorrow morning, especially since banking stocks have led the overall markets higher and lower in recent weeks.

The risk is that now the ratings agencies are scrutinising sovereign balance sheets it won’t be long before France and the UK get downgraded, which could set off another bout of market volatility.

There were some interesting stories in this weekend’s papers. Italy’s perilous state was amplified by news that it had asked the British air force, the RAF, to leave one of its bases, which had originally been offered as a re-fuelling post en-route to missions in Libya. The reason was that it couldn’t afford the lost landing fees from commercial jets, so the UK has until Thursday to move operations to Sardinia.

The UK Sunday papers were also digesting the latest round of QE. The Sunday Times was fairly scathing in its view that more QE will hurt pensions rather than boosting economic growth. That may be a reflection of the demographic that makes up the bulk of Sunday Times’ readers, but with inflation at 5%, QE has received a fairly chilly reception by the UK press all round. The editorial in today’s Times suggested that waiting for the government to embark on its plan to restore growth is turning into something from Waiting for Godot. Not exactly damning at this stage, but if Osborne doesn’t act quick his policies will be subject to more than the odd sarcastic literary reference.

Some of you may notice this is a bit later than usual but I wanted to wait for the tete-a-tete between Merkel and Sarkozy to come to an end before I gave my weekend musings. Added to that, I needed to do some research for IN (impending nuptials) that is both incredibly time consuming and also strangely addictive.

Ahead this week, watch out for US retail sales and Fed minutes. In the UK labour market data will be the key release and in the Eurozone it will be industrial production and the final reading of CPI data for September that will dominate the calendar. Also watch out for Slovakia – one of the newest, smallest and poorest EZ states is holding out on passing the changes to the EFSF agreed in July. If it doesn’t get through the Slovakian Parliament then the EFSF may not be extended to EUR 440bn, which is already deemed too small. Yet again, the Eurozone proves it works in mysterious ways...

The views expressed are the author's, not FNArena's (see our disclaimer).

Disclaimer: The information and opinions in this report are for general information use only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any currency or CFD contract. All opinions and information contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any particular recipient. Any references to historical price movements or levels is informational based on our analysis and we do not represent or warranty that any such movements or levels are likely to reoccur in the future. While the information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, author does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness, nor does author assume any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.

Foreign Exchange and other leveraged products involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Increasing leverage increases risk. Spot Gold and Silver contracts are not subject to regulation under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act. Contracts for Difference (CFDs) are not available for US residents. Before deciding to trade forex, you should carefully consider your financial objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained herein is intended as general information about the subject matter covered and is provided with the understanding that FOREX.com is not rendering investment, legal, or tax advice. You should consult with appropriate counsel or other advisors on all investment, legal, or tax matters. FOREX.com is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the US, by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the UK, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) in Australia, and the Financial Services Agency (FSA) in Japan.

 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Top Ten Weekly Recommendation, Target Price, Earnings Forecast Changes

By Chris Shaw

The first week of October has again brought more ratings upgrades than downgrades by the eight brokers in the FNArena database, the six upgrades double the number of downgrades in the period. Total Buy ratings now stand at 59.5%, up from 59% previously.

Citi upgraded Mirvac ((MGR)) to a Buy to reflect the view that management's moves to reposition the portfolio imply negative risks at the property developer are reducing. This is especially the case given a high level of earnings through FY14 have already been secured, adds the stockbroker.

Charter Hall Office ((CQO)) is another property play to score an upgrade, UBS lifting its recommendation to Buy given the view an offer for the company at closer to net tangible asset backing could still emerge. 

For CSL ((CSL)), changes to foreign exchange assumptions by Credit Suisse have been enough to justify an upgrade to an Outperform rating. This reflects increased upside potential relative to a price target that has also been revised higher.

Both Tabcorp ((TAH)) and Alumina ((AWC)) have enjoyed upgrades on valuation grounds, the former from Macquarie and the latter from Citi. Tatts ((TTS)) has also been upgraded to Hold by Citi, this due to higher earnings estimates and an increased price target thanks to higher ticket sales from the introduction of Saturday Lotto Six.

BHP Billiton ((BHP)) has similarly been upgraded to Outperform by Credit Suisse as recent share price weakness is pricing in overly pessimistic commodity price reductions in the broker's view. An initiation of coverage for Campbell Brothers ((CPB)) with a Buy rating by Merrill Lynch has lifted overall ratings for that company. BA-ML's initiation includes earnings estimates 8-16% above consensus through FY14.

On the downgrade side, Credit Suisse has cut its rating on Caltex ((CTX)) to Underperform from Neutral on the back of revised oil price and Australian dollar forecasts. This has the effect of impacting on expected refining margins.

For Citi a further deterioration in the global economic backdrop has driven changes to earnings estimates and price target for National Australia Bank ((NAB)). These changes are enough to see the broker downgrade to a Hold rating from Buy previously. Forecasts and price target have also been reduced.

It is a similar story for QBE Insurance ((QBE)), as UBS has downgraded to a Neutral rating given the view the market is unlikely to recognise what appears good long-term value for some time thanks to poor operating conditions and current margin volatility. The downgrade by UBS was accompanied by cuts to earnings estimates and price target.

Solid recent share price performance and tougher conditions in the US have been enough for UBS to downgrade Sonic Health ((SHL)) to Sell from Neutral, the broker arguing current earnings risks are not being fully priced in by the market. Earnings estimates and price target have also been trimmed.

The increase in offer for Charter Hall Office has caused brokers to adjust price targets higher in accordance with the change in offer, while some increases to estimates for Caltex by Citi have seen both overall earnings estimates and price target for the stock move higher. 

The upgrade in rating for CSL has been accompanied by an increase in price target and earnings estimates, while on the other side of the ledger changes to commodity price and foreign exchange assumptions have brought about cuts to price targets for BHP. JP Morgan has similarly lowered its target and forecasts for Alumina, while BA-ML's initiation on Campbell Brothers has brought down the average price target for the stock.

Factoring in full year earnings has sparked some changes to earnings estimates for Gindalbie ((GBG)) and Perseus ((PRU)), while on the back of recent commodity price movements earnings and price target for Newcrest ((NCM)) have also been adjusted. Earnings estimates for Whitehaven ((WHC)) have also risen to account for additional volume assumptions.

Forecasts for Murchison Metals ((MMX)) have been lowered to reflect increased uncertainty with respect to the Jack Hills mine and associated port and rail infrastructure projects. Changes to commodity forecasts see cuts to earnings estimates for Alumina and Paladin ((PDN)), while Paladin's earnings have also been adjusted for the recent capital raising.

Outlook commentary at Oakton's ((OKN)) annual general meeting indicated a still soft operating environment and this sees cuts to estimates across the market, which has also impacted on price targets. Thorn Group ((TGA)) has missed out on a contract re-tender and this has brought about some reductions to earnings estimates and price target, while a weaker macro environment has generated cuts to earnings forecasts for Sims Metal ((SGM)). Price targets for the shares have also come down as a result.

Note: FNArena monitors eight leading stockbrokers on a daily basis and the tables below are based on data analysis from the week past concerning these eight equity market experts. The eight experts in casu are: BA-Merrill Lynch, Citi, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Macquarie, RBS and UBS.

 

Total Recommendations
Recommendation Changes

 

Broker Recommendation Breakup

 

Broker Rating

Order Company Old Rating New Rating Broker
Upgrade
1 ALUMINA LIMITED Sell Neutral Citi
2 BATHURST RESOURCES LIMITED Neutral Buy UBS
3 BHP BILLITON LIMITED Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
4 BILLABONG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Neutral Buy Citi
5 CHARTER HALL OFFICE REIT Neutral Buy UBS
6 COFFEY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Neutral Buy UBS
7 CSL LIMITED Neutral Buy Credit Suisse
8 TABCORP HOLDINGS LIMITED Sell Neutral Macquarie
Downgrade
9 CALTEX AUSTRALIA LIMITED Neutral Sell Credit Suisse
10 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED Buy Neutral Citi
11 QBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITED Buy Neutral UBS
 
Special Note: we have translated all ratings changes in simplified Buy/Hold/Sell labels for readers who are as yet not familiar with typical stockbroker lingo such as "Outperform" or "Underweight".

Recommendation

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 MGR 71.0% 86.0% 15.0% 7
2 CQO 29.0% 43.0% 14.0% 7
3 CSL 50.0% 63.0% 13.0% 8
4 NUF 25.0% 38.0% 13.0% 8
5 AWC 50.0% 63.0% 13.0% 8
6 TAH 13.0% 25.0% 12.0% 8
7 BHP 63.0% 75.0% 12.0% 8
8 TTS 38.0% 50.0% 12.0% 8
9 GPT 57.0% 67.0% 10.0% 6
10 CPB 50.0% 57.0% 7.0% 7

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Rating New Rating Change Recs
1 CSV 50.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 4
2 CTX 50.0% 33.0% - 17.0% 6
3 NAB 88.0% 75.0% - 13.0% 8
4 QBE 63.0% 50.0% - 13.0% 8
5 SHL 75.0% 63.0% - 12.0% 8
6 AUB 60.0% 50.0% - 10.0% 4
7 DOW 43.0% 33.0% - 10.0% 6
8 WOR 43.0% 33.0% - 10.0% 6
9 MRE - 25.0% - 33.0% - 8.0% 3
10 CEU - 17.0% - 20.0% - 3.0% 5
 

Target Price

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 CQO 3.426 3.490 1.87% 7
2 CTX 11.793 11.918 1.06% 6
3 AUB 6.670 6.723 0.79% 4
4 CSL 33.249 33.499 0.75% 8
5 GPT 3.277 3.300 0.70% 6
6 TTS 2.396 2.409 0.54% 8

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous Target New Target Change Recs
1 BHP 51.679 49.228 - 4.74% 8
2 AWC 2.251 2.151 - 4.44% 8
3 WOR 29.790 28.862 - 3.12% 6
4 CSV 1.338 1.300 - 2.84% 4
5 QBE 16.180 15.743 - 2.70% 8
6 NAB 27.863 27.201 - 2.38% 8
7 DOW 4.296 4.225 - 1.65% 6
8 MGR 1.377 1.369 - 0.58% 7
9 CPB 49.278 49.024 - 0.52% 7
10 SHL 12.809 12.804 - 0.04% 8
 

Earning Forecast

Positive Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 GBG 0.614 1.029 67.59% 6
2 TNE 6.767 7.933 17.23% 3
3 ORI 170.975 196.425 14.89% 8
4 NAB 249.088 266.025 6.80% 8
5 DLX 21.486 22.500 4.72% 7
6 ANZ 214.500 224.575 4.70% 8
7 NCM 208.971 217.229 3.95% 8
8 PRU 24.600 25.433 3.39% 6
9 CTX 110.567 113.550 2.70% 6
10 WHC 37.820 38.750 2.46% 5

Negative Change Covered by > 2 Brokers

Order Symbol Previous EF New EF Change Recs
1 MMX 1.033 - 0.733 - 170.96% 3
2 MRE 5.400 3.500 - 35.19% 3
3 AWC 7.160 6.443 - 10.01% 8
4 PDN 1.867 1.753 - 6.11% 7
5 PPT 170.657 160.486 - 5.96% 7
6 GNC 81.130 77.518 - 4.45% 6
7 OKN 20.300 19.420 - 4.33% 5
8 IAG 29.425 28.213 - 4.12% 8
9 TGA 20.227 19.467 - 3.76% 3
10 SGM 133.500 128.500 - 3.75% 7
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

Weekly Broker Wrap: Commodity Forecasts Cut

- Europe forces reductions in global growth assumptions
- Cuts to base and bulk metal price forecasts follow
- Industrial and financial sectors also hit
- Gold remains a winner


By Greg Peel

The Australian stock market began on a weak note last week, carrying on the August-September theme of European uncertainty driving fear and widespread reductions to global growth forecasts. However an apparent newfound agreement among leaders that they must act swiftly to recapitalise European banks ahead of a more severe restructuring (or “orderly default”) of Greek sovereign debt sparked very solid rallies through to the end of the week.

There is little disagreement that Europe holds the key to market direction from here. Forecasts are largely binary in that continued dithering equals bad and definitive action equals good. However economists around the world have cut global growth forecasts on the assumption European growth will be difficult either way. Thereafter, the US continues to walk the tight rope between low growth and recession, while it remains difficult to find solid agreement on just how China will fare.

The problem for analysts is that they don't like to move forecasts around too often. Given changes in commodity and currency price forecasts can magnify into substantial changes in resource stock valuations, shifting price assumptions too often simply leads to confusion. Better to be more resolute about forecasts for periods of a quarter or more such that valuations can come with some level of conviction. But when prices move significantly analysts are reluctantly forced into action. Last week saw analysts bowing to weak market pressures and taking a knife to forecasts, albeit by week's end the mood had brightened with the potential for Europe to finally get its act together now in the sights.

The RBS commodity analysts in Hong Kong decided to reassess commodity price forecasts over a week ago, reverting to a bear case scenario in which both Europe and the US fall into recession. Under this scenario, RBS sees the weak commodity price levels of September carry through the fourth quarter and into 2012. The Hong Kong team acknowledges, however, their global commodity analyst colleagues are more “constructive” on the 2012 outlook.

RBS Hong Kong believes price to book value ratios are more relevant in a cyclical downturn than either PE or enterprise value measurements. Applying the PB ratios reached in the 2008 trough suggests the potential for significant valuation downside for global steel and base metal companies. Coal companies on the other hand have more stable earnings streams.

Credit Suisse also decided early last week it was time to address commodity price forecasts and mimicked the IMF in suggesting forecasts had entered “a dangerous new phase”. Summarising their views ahead of what we might call the “light at the end of the tunnel” of European agreement mid-week, the analysts suggested the short-term risks remain firmly to the downside and prices would remain highly volatile. Once the panic subsides, nevertheless, the trick will be to assess just how much longer term damage has been done to the real economy.

Clearly any failure to resolve the European situation would mean further weakness, but Credit Suisse is happy to note that while eurozone economic data have weakened considerably, the same is not true in China or even in the US. Assuming a European resolution is not far off, the analysts are looking for commodity prices to trough in the fourth quarter before resuming their decade-long upward trend in 2012.

Importantly, CS suggests China will take the opportunity of much weaker commodity prices, particularly for industrial metals, to undertake aggressive inventory restocking once the fear in the North Atlantic subsides.

BA-Merrill Lynch also believes the December quarter will provide the nadir for the current commodity price downturn. Merrills has held a positive view on commodities since 2009 but has been forced to cut price assumptions three times since March this year, with last week prompting the third cut. However, the analysts believe that as the dust settles in Europe the fundamental conditions which existed post-GFC will reemerge to set the rally in train once more.

Low central bank cash rates and quantitative easing in developed markets have meant negative real interest rates, as was the case post-GFC. Emerging markets such as China have the capacity to also cut rates if necessary and some, including Brazil, already have. As some form of rescue package is finally engineered for Europe, Merrills sees an attractive entry point into resource sector stocks, with lower commodity currency (eg AUD) levels attracting near term investment flows.

On the base metal front, and remembering that commodity analysts like to keep their price forecasts mostly below spot for industrial commodities, Merrills sees a copper price of US$2.40/lb as the trough this quarter before rebound potential to US$3.80/lb in 2012. The current spot price is US$3.30/lb. In copper the analysts like OZ Minerals ((OZL) and PanAust ((PNA)).

Coal and iron prices will also continue to come under pressure but Merrills is expecting 7% growth in Chinese steel production in 2012. This should see a floor in the iron ore price at the US$140-150/t level, the analysts suggest, with Chinese cost inflation providing a backstop. In iron ore Merrills likes Fortescue Metals ((FMG)) and Atlas Iron ((AGO)).

Meanwhile Merrills has trimmed earnings forecasts for BHP Billiton ((BHP)) and Rio Tinto ((RIO)) by 10% and dropped base metal miner price targets between 10% and 20%.

Goldman Sachs is now assuming a recession in Europe and weaker growth elsewhere around the world, including in the US, China and India. Goldmans' global GDP growth forecasts have been cut to 3.8% from 3.9% in 2011 and to 3.5% from 4.2% in 2012. For Australia, GS now sees 2011 growth of 1.5%, down from 1.7%, and 3.0% growth in 2012, down from 3.5%. The analysts have trimmed their Aussie dollar assumptions accordingly.

Global growth assumptions translate into oil price assumptions, and here GS has cut its fourth quarter 2011 Brent crude price forecast to US$110/bbl from US$125/bbl and its 2012 forecast to US$120/bbl from US$130/bbl. The analysts note however that non-OPEC oil supply has disappointed again in 2011 while global demand has proved more robust than previously assumed. OPEC producers have less than one million barrels per day of excess capacity and demand should be seasonally stronger in the fourth quarter, so Goldmans suggests Libyan production needs to be reestablished quickly.

For Australian oil and gas producers, Goldman Sachs notes reductions in price forecasts are largely offset by reductions in currency forecasts. The analysts are attracted to Woodside's ((WPL)) heavily discounted valuation and are also keen on attractive prices for Santos ((STO)) and Origin Energy ((ORG)), however early execution risks for the latter two's CSG LNG projects keeps the broker on Neutral for now. On the other hand, Oil Search ((OSH)) boasts the most attractive LNG exposure in the region, Goldmans suggests.

Refining margins in Asia have remained strong which should have been good news for Caltex ((CTX)) this year, were it not for the headwinds of the strong Aussie. Thus with Aussie forecasts now reduced, Goldmans sees a brighter outlook for the local refiner in 2012.

Goldman Sachs' equity strategists have also been in on the act, reducing forecast earnings for both resources and industrial stocks in Australia and also reducing PE multiples to reflect weaker sentiment. A cynic might thus suggest the strategists have thus reduced their ASX 200 price forecasts yet again in order to catch up to the market.

GS has now set a December quarter target for the ASX 200 of 4075, down from a previous target of 4450. By mid next year the analysts see 4400, down from 4800, and by end next year 4725, down from 5000. That implies a 22% return over 12 months including 4% of yield.

Lower global growth forecasts and weaker markets do not only impact upon resource sector stocks. Goldman Sachs put New Corp ((NWS)) on its Conviction List given its recent phone hacking-related price plunge, but notes that gap has now reduced materially. Fallout from weaker global growth will include weaker advertising demand, so Goldmans has now taken News off its Conviction List.

In the first half of 2011 we spent our time wondering to what extent excessive disaster claims would have on Australia's insurers. In the second half we have had to worry about impact the insurers will suffer on the investments needed to pay claims, given significantly weaker markets. This week Credit Suisse warned of lower earnings and dividend cuts in the sector. (See Weak Market Hurts Australian Insurers).

Returning to our hopes that a resolution in Europe may be edging nearer, one might be forgiven for assuming a victim of any good news would be the gold price. Clearly gold has been carrying a premium in its role as safe haven against financial disaster. Yet for most analysts the opposite is actually true. European debt restructuring basically suggests quantitative easing in some form or another, and if you like we can be more basic and say it means money printing.

This means global monetary inflation, and that means expectations of a higher gold price. Hence analysts spent this week revising up their gold price forecasts – some quite substantially. (See Gold Still Shines).
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: The Honeymoon Continues

By Greg Peel

The Dow rose 183 points or 1.7% while the S&P gained 1.8% to 1164 and the Nasdaq added 1.9%.

And then there were two. Last night the Dutch parliament passed the EFSF bill leaving only Malta and Slovakia to hold their votes early next week. The trick will then be what to actually do with the E440bn fund. We know that European leaders finally agree that bank recapitalisation ahead of an orderly Greek default is the necessary plan, but the details of that plan are yet to be determined.

The expectation is that the details are now being nutted out and will be presented at the EU summit on October 17. This leaves another ten days of room to disagree, bicker and disrupt, but one gets the felling Europe has finally figured it out. Figured out, that is, that it's time to show a united front. No end of damage has been done to reputations in the past two years, but then one can hardly look to the US as a role model either.

Last night Jean-Claude Trichet held his final press conference before the end of his eight-year tender as ECB president. Previously markets had assumed the ECB would cut its cash rate in the face of the turmoil but Trichet had poured cold water on that idea, and true to form he left the ECB cash rate steady at 1.5% last night. However he did announce a raft of other “unconventional” policy measures.

Those measures are described as “tried and trusty” by the Wall Street Journal given Trichet is reverting to strategies put in place in 2008 after the fall of Lehman. We must recall at this point that the eurozone does not have a common bond to replicate the US Treasuries or UK gilts for example, so any form of quantitative easing has to be more imaginative than just printing money to buy sovereign paper.

The ECB will restart its program of buying covered bank bonds next month and will hold two separate tenders of one-year refinancing for eurozone banks. Echoing the Fed's new policy of specifying timing, the ECB will provide banks with as much liquidity as they need until at least July 2012. In other words, we might now be able to assume that whatever happens on the default front, from Greece to anyone else, European banks will not crash under the weight of losses.

Where will this funding come from? Well that's where the EFSF comes in. It has long been noted that E440bn might cover Greece, Portugal and even Spain but not Italy, but we are yet to find out what sort of leverage will be applied to the EFSF and what sort of complex system will be put in place to feed the ECB. But perhaps the salient point here is the message European officials are now sending to the so-called “bond vigilantes” – a message which basically suggests “we're bigger than you are so you might as well back off”. For two years we have seen nothing but band-aid measures to support Greece and the other PIIGS which have not been sufficient to prevent financial markets from undermining the capacity of the peripherals to finance their budget deficits.

The Poms also got into the act last night. There's been a lot of thigh-slapping around The City of late as the British have reflected on their sensible decision not to join a common currency which has brought its continental neighbours to their knees more effectively than Nelson could ever have managed. And there has also been talk of leaving the EU. But the UK has not been immune to the goings on in Europe and its economy is feeling the fallout. Last night the Bank of England announced a 75bn pound increase to its asset purchase program to 275bn pounds, which has been dubbed a British “QE2”. 

The decision by the ECB not to raise rates last night meant the euro rallied, despite the implications of QE in the announced ECB policies. This meant the US dollar could stop rising for once and instead it fell 0.5% to 78.54 in its index. The move took the pressure off commodity prices, and as such we saw metals surge in London, with copper up 4.5% and tin 7% amongst the positive moves.

Oil chimed in, with Brent up US$3.00 to US$105.73/bbl and West Texas up US$2.91 to US$82.59/bbl. Silver was up 5%, and gold quietly moved US$8.90 higher to US$1648.40/oz.

Aside from a rolling stream of positive news out of Europe, last night Wall Street learned that the big chain stores saw their sales rise 5.8% in the September back-to-school season. Heavy discounting helped, but economists had expected only a 4.9% gain. And last week's new jobless claims rose by only 6,000 to a one-month average of 401,000 when economists had expected 410,000.

Such data underscore a commonly held belief that if you take the European effect out of the equation, the US economy is not faring as badly as many have assumed. Talk of a double-dip recession has now eased.

Australia was also pleasantly surprised by its latest retail sales data released this week, and yesterday's session was certainly a cracker. Indeed it was the biggest up-day since December 2008. Praise the Lord and pass the retsina – it's beginning to look a lot like a rally. 

We should probably remember, however, that the December 2008 rally soon gave way and the GFC low was not established until March 2009. Then, too, there was a honeymoon period as the world revelled in the TARP but soon the party faded and champagne went flat. The question thus is: is what we are now seeing just another honeymoon session ahead of an inevitable hangover?

I believe it's important to note that a significant feature on Wall Street in late 2008 and early 2009 was “redemption window” selling. Small equity investors in the US were leveraged to the gills before the GFC and could only watch helplessly as stock prices crashed given the funds they were invested in only allowed redemptions during specific quarterly windows of time. They had to wait until those windows opened, and then they pulled their money out in droves. This meant those funds had to sell underlying stock positions, and they did so relentlessly, day after day, in the period in question. Some funds had even frozen redemptions initially, so unfreezing meant further selling into 2009.

I hate to use what is usually a kiss of death expression, but this time it's different. This time not only have most investors shied away from the levels of leverage which had them in so much trouble in the GFC, they have mostly shied away from the stock market altogether. And so have the mutual funds, which are currently holding record levels of cash. And this time not only are US corporates not geared to ridiculous levels, they're sitting on mountains of readies. This time there is no desperate need to sell out of the stock market in the face of looming bankruptcy.

Such a position would then suggest that not only does this market not have the same scope to fall, it has a much greater scope to rise. Because if we can get through this (hopefully) final period of European decision-making and policy implementation unscathed, then there is an awful lot of money in the US in particular earning negative real interest on unallocated cash. If the market starts to move and the mutual funds begin to feel they're being left behind, look out.

So enjoy, but bear in mind we really are in a honeymoon phase right this very moment in which the covering of short positions is playing a major part. When they're cleared out, the next move may yet be down again before we can really, honestly, call the bottom.

The SPI Overnight was up another 68 points or 1.7%.

For those who were wondering, Apple shares closed down a mere 0.1%. In the US tonight, attention swings back to those other jobs.

A reminder that Rudi will be making his presentation, “Helping Investors Adapt To Changing Markets” at the Melbourne Trading & Investing Expo today and tomorrow at 3.45pm at the Melbourne Convention & Exhibition Centre, Seminar Room 2.

I'd steer clear of the Sydney CBD from lunchtime on today – there'll be a lot of thirsty stockbrokers getting on it. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Fund Managers Still Prefer Defensive Assets

- Russell Investments releases September quarter fund manager survey
- Survey shows fund mangers continue to prefer defensive assets
- Australian equities seen as undervalued
- Interest cuts seen as most likely catalyst for domestic non-mining growth

By Chris Shaw

In the September quarter investors have had to deal with continued equity market weakness and heightened market volatility, reflecting escalating European sovereign debt concerns and doubts about the sustainability of a US economic recovery.

The latest Russell Investment Management survey of Australian investment managers and their views about the market has been conducted with this as a backdrop, the result being some changes in views from the June quarter.

A total of 31% of managers are now bearish on international shares, Greg Liddell, Russell managing director, consulting and advisory services, noting this is ten times the number of managers that were bearish on the asset class at the end of the March quarter.

A majority of fund mangers, 77%, see the Australian equity market as undervalued, the highest number of managers with such a view since Russell began its surveys in 2005. In contrast, 6% of managers see Australian stocks as overvalued at present. The positive views reflect an assessment the Australian economy is relatively well placed compared to developed counterparts.

What didn't change was the number of managers largely maintaining a preference for defensive assets, as evidenced by a further rise of 10% in bullish sentiment with respect to Australian bonds. At the same time bearish sentiment among managers towards growth assets such as Australian and international shares also increased, by 6% and 10% respectively.

The more defensive nature of Australian REIT shares meant managers turned less bearish on the sector in the September quarter. Overall, Liddell, notes managers remain more bullish on domestic shares at 66% than on international shares at 57%. 

Views are most bullish for the telecommunications, materials and industrials sectors. Between 59-62% of mangers are bullish on these sectors, which for industrials is an increase from 46% last quarter. Financials are also becoming more popular with 47% of managers now bullish, up from 42% previously. While a majority of managers are bullish on the materials sector, Liddell notes bearish sentiment towards this sector has doubled from 19% to 38% in the June quarter. 

At the other end of the market managers are least bullish on the consumer discretionary, IT and consumer staples sectors, with only 29-35% of managers bullish on these sectors and 50% of managers bearish on consumer discretionary stocks. 

For smaller capitalisation stocks around one-third of all managers are bearish at present according to Liddell, which compares to 20% of managers being bearish on the broader market.

Falls in the Australian dollar during the quarter allowed managers to become more bullish on the currency, with 15% more managers taking a positive view on the dollar than was the case in the June quarter.

As market volatility has risen a series of interest rate cuts have been priced in for the next 12 months in Australia and Liddell notes this has seen sentiment towards Australian cash turn more bearish. A total of 37% of managers are now bearish on the domestic cash market, up from 26% in the June survey. 

At the same time sentiment towards Australian bonds has improved, with 29% of managers now taking a bullish view. This is up from 19% in the June quarter and, as Liddell suggests, highlights the fact Australian bonds are better value than international bonds at present.

With the Australian economy continuing to show significant divergence in performance between the resources sector and the rest of the market, managers were asked what could spark a recovery in domestic growth. 

Liddell notes interest rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of Australia was the most likely catalyst according to 43% of managers, while about 35% suggested the most likely catalyst would be an economic recovery in global developed markets.

A similar survey by Russell of fund managers in the US showed a significant majority of managers, 79%, don't see the US economy entering a double-dip recession. This is due to strong corporate balance sheets and high corporate profit levels offering some reasons for optimism.

In contrast, a total of 11% of US fund managers suggests the US is entering a double-dip recession, with most of these managers suggesting a jobs recovery is the critical element needed to drive a recovery in the broader economy. 

 
Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Europe Embraces Progress

By Greg Peel

The Dow rose 131 points or 1.2% while the S&P gained 1.8% to 1144 and the Nasdaq added 2.3%.

European stock markets had already closed on Tuesday when a report came through that European finance ministers were looking to recapitalise the region's banks ahead of a more severe but orderly restructuring of Greek sovereign debt. Wall Street shot up in a heart beat on the news and last night European markets had their chance, with London's index rising 3%, France's 4% and Germany's 5%.

Adding to optimism was a statement from German chancellor Angela Merkel last night in favour of bank recapitalisation. Little can be achieved in the eurozone without the support of the German government. Markets are now hoping that a plan will be unveiled at the next European Union summit to be held on October 17.

Markets are also likely to be further comforted when the three remaining parliaments – those of the Netherlands, Malta and Slovakia – pass the EFSF bill, finally ratifying its size and structure. There has been talk of Slovakia being against the idea, but one wonders whether the dirt-poor Slovaks can really see an advantage in seriously pissing off the entire world. Merkel subtly put a rocket up the three laggards last night, entreating them to get on with it.

Wall Street opened last night still reeling from Tuesday's late 350 point Dow rally and no doubt wondering what to do next. News that the September services PMI had fallen to 53.0 from 53.3 in August was not cork-popping stuff but the result still implies expansion in the sector which provides 80% of US output and that does not signal recession. Better news came in the form of the ADP private sector jobs result for August which showed a gain of 91,000 jobs compared to expectations of 75,000. Wall Street is now hoping for a better non-farm payrolls number for September, due tomorrow night, following August's disaster.

Global services PMIs have rolled in over the last 24 hours, albeit China's was posted on Monday. It showed an increase to 59.3 from 57.6 which is a very solid and expansionary result, again calming fears of a rapid Chinese slowdown. Australia's was a little disappointing on a fall to 50.3 from 52.1 but at least it's still the right side of the line – just.

The UK liked its increase to 52.9 from 51.1 but the wet blanket was the eurozone, which saw a fall to 48.8 from 51.5. But really, are we shocked? The eurozone also publishes a “composite” PMI which collates all of the manufacturing, services and construction numbers and it fell to 49.9 in September from 50.2 in August. It's only just on the wrong side, but it's the first indication of general contraction since June 2009.

Europe is looking at a recession – we know that.

After absorbing the economic data Wall Street decided it was still time to buy, albeit last night's volume was only about half of that seen on Tuesday. The bulk of the volume on Tuesday was accumulated when the Dow was pushing southward, while the last half hour's extraordinary rally occurred largely in a vacuum. This is not the stuff of major bottoms, but then we cannot call a bottom until the latest developments in Europe are played out and a definitive solution is bedded down. So realistically we're only now looking at short-covering and a backing away from the sellers rather than a wholesale assault from the buyers. Given Europe's track record of dithering, dallying and delaying, no one much will be brave enough to call the opera over until the fat lady has sung, taken her bow, accepted her flowers, changed out of her costume and is in the green room guzzling the bubbly.

October 17 will be an important date if we can really foresee the EU summit providing the Great Rescue Plan. What are we up to? Plan M, N, O? Prior to the summit – next Tuesday to be precise – Alcoa will release its September quarter earnings result and in so doing officially kick off the US quarterly earnings season. High hopes are still being held for good results to be posted, but the concern is just how bad Q4 and 2012 earnings guidance may be from company managements.

We must remember, nevertheless, that it's always better to talk down guidance and then post an upside surprise than it is to talk up guidance and then disappoint the market.

Before we get to next week, tonight the ECB will make a rate decision. Expectations here have taken somewhat of a back-flip given a rate cut is no longer expected. Only last week commentators were talking at least 25 and maybe even 50 basis points, but rhetoric from Trichet in the meantime has rather poured cold water on those expectations. It is nevertheless expected Trichet will announce other quantitative easing-type measures such as further sovereign bond purchases, and hopefully his legacy, at his final press conference as ECB president, will be to announce a new collateral facility as part of the bank recapitalisation plan.

The fact that it is Trichet's last policy meeting before his tenure expires has been cited as why he would not reverse the rate rise he implemented only a few months ago. He might look like a fool. Some might say it's a bit late.

Base metals trading had already closed on Tuesday before the Wall Street rally although last night's responses were not exactly exciting. Copper was up 1.7% to mark the biggest move in the complex. Oil shot up last night however, with West Texas leaping US$4.11 or 5% to US$79.78/bbl on news of a larger than expected weekly US inventory offtake. These weekly numbers are about as useful as the weekly jobless claims numbers (ie not) but Brent still managed a US$2.94 rise to US$102.73/bbl.

The Aussie risk indicator has put in a solid recovery, rising a cent to US$0.9652 when the US dollar index fell only 0.2% to 78.94. Gold found some buying again, rallying US$22.30 to US$1639.50/oz. The US ten-year bond yield jumped another 12 basis points to 1.90%.

The SPI Overnight was up 69 points or 1.8%.

Rudi will be appearing on Sky Business at noon today and then he's off to Melbourne for the Trade Expo tomorrow and Saturday. Mexicans are cordially invited to rock up and catch Rudi's presentations.

The Melbourne Expo means FNArena's fortnightly chart-topping live show, Market Insight, will not be seen today but rather it has been shifted to next week.

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

Weak Market Hurts Australian Insurers

By Greg Peel

Insurance companies collect premiums on policies and invest those proceeds in various financial markets. In simplified terms, an insurer's earnings are the net of returns on those investments and the payouts made on policies in the period (if we ignore reinsurance for the moment). Earnings thus come under threat at times when markets are volatile and weak and if investment portfolios are weighted towards underperforming assets. Presently we have the case of globally weak stock prices and globally strong (low yield) fixed interest prices.

On that basis, the analysts at Credit Suisse have updated their earnings forecasts for Australia's major listed insurers to allow for market movements in the September quarter. How those insurers subsequently fare is a reflection of investment portfolio allocations.

Insurance Australia Group ((IAG)) boasts $3.6bn of shareholder funds of which 41% is invested in “growth” assets, Credit Suisse notes, split as 23.5% equities and 17.6% convertible bonds (equity hybrids). Clearly the current market weakness is impacting on IAG's earnings, to the point the broker has downgraded its FY12 profit forecast by 29%. [IAG runs June-end accounts.]

The good news is CS has made only minimal changes to forecasts beyond FY12, and indeed its second half FY12 forecast profit has been reduced by only 1% while its first half is down 66%. This would tend to imply the analysts see an end to current market volatility by next calendar year. The bad news for shareholders is the analysts have also cut their first half dividend expectation by 60% to 3cps.

On a similar basis, CS sees downside risk to the QBE Insurance ((QBE)) dividend, although the broker has not yet cut its forecast. Given weather claims in the second half of 2011 have been minimal, QBE may be able to maintain a flat dividend or at least keep any reduction to a minimum, the analysts suggest. [QBE runs December-end accounts.]

CS has nevertheless downgraded forecast 2011 profit by 14%, with its second half forecast falling 26%. Outer year changes are minimal. At that level, flat dividend forecasts imply a 100% payout ratio over 2011 and 115% for the final distribution. Hence the downside risk to QBE dividends.

In contrast to its peers, Suncorp-Metway's ((SUN)) investment portfolio is far more conservative, the broker notes, given its general insurance funds are all in fixed interest and equity exposure for the life business is less than 10%. The result is that Suncorp actually scores an earnings upgrade in FY11 from CS, albeit only a mere 1.4%. This is matched by slight earnings decreases in latter years. [June-end accounting.]

The problem for AMP ((AMP)) is compounded by weak investment inflows on top of weak market returns, the broker notes. CS has downgraded forecast profit by around 4% in both 2011 and 2012. [December-end accounting.]

The good news is that AMP is carrying some downside protection for its capital position, but operational earnings are clearly going to be affected by weak equity markets, the broker suggests, and the longer the market remains volatile the more likely funds flow will also remain weak.

Despite Credit Suisse's cuts to profit and dividend forecasts, the analysts have changed neither their target prices for the insurers nor their ratings. IAG and QBE thus both retain Neutral ratings from CS on target prices of $3.60 and $13.50 respectively while Suncorp and AMP retain Outperform on targets of $9.50 and $5.00.

Assigning values to the Buy, Hold and Sell ratings of each of the eight brokers in the FNArena database for each of the four stocks provides a sentiment indicator (range of plus one to minus one) for IAG of 0.3, for QBE of 0.5, for Suncorp of 0.9 and for AMP of 0.8. Please refer to FNArena's Stock Analysis for more detailed information.
 

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Solution?

By Greg Peel

The Dow closed up 153 points or 1.4% while the S&P jumped up 2.2% and the Nasdaq a full 3.0%.

If Paul Stanley still wants to rock and roll all night then all he had to do was follow Wall Street last night. On heavy volume, the Dow initially fell 250 points, clawed that back to be down only 55, and fell again to be down 200. Up to about 3pm, one might have been tempted to declare a “capitulation” session which in its self is a positive sign from a contrarian perspective, if not the ultimate signal for a bottom. But there was more to come.

Wall Street simply gapped lower on the open, driven by what seemed to be more delay tactics and dithering from Europe. Greece had hoped it would have received the next E8bn tranche of its bail-out fund by now, but a failure to project sufficient budget reductions has held that up. Initially the troika was to hold up its decision until mid-October, cognisant of the fact Greece would run out of money by end-October. Before the bell on the NYSE last night, it was announced that decision will now be held up until mid-November, at which point, one presumes, Greece would be stone motherless.

Oh God – another delay. Surely the risk of a disorderly Greek default just jumped up to almost inevitable status? At least that's the way Wall Street saw it from the bell. But if we look to the reason why the troika called yet another delay, we might see that there is method in the madness.

I opened my Report yesterday with the question: might this really be good news in disguise? I was referring to the news Greece had failed to reach its budget projection targets, in theory making it ineligible for the E8bn, the news of which had the Dow closing down 250. My suggestion was that given the disaster that would follow a disorderly Greek default, finally Europe would have to be spurred into definitive action.

Wall Street initially saw the new delay as bad news, but the reason for the delay is to allow time for the troika to renegotiate the haircut deal it had previously agreed upon (although not yet enacted) with holders of Greek sovereign debt. The initial deal was for holders to take a 21% haircut on the face value of their positions in return for EU support of Greece and default prevention. At the time, bond markets were pricing in 50% haircut. One reason markets are that much lower in the interim is the difference between 21% fantasy and 50% reality. 

It is now clear Greece cannot meet its bail-out requirements and, let's face it, probably never could. No doubt it is with this in mind the troika has delayed the Greek payment to insist upon a more substantial bondholder haircut and put such a restructure to bed. And why not? When the European banks bought the debt, it was simply a free market trading decision, and a very bad one. 

Whether or not Wall Street began to figure out that last night's initial news was maybe more good than bad in the scheme of things, it's hard to say. The market turned at 10am and started heading northward, but not before the benchmark S&P 500 index had breached the 1090 level, meaning it was down 20% from its last peak and thus, semantically, in a “bear market”. Such technical levels can either prompt more intensified selling or, in this case, buying from value-seekers. However at the same time, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke was making a testimony to Congress.

In addressing the risk of a potential run on the US banking system as a flow-on from the same in Europe, Bernanke suggested, “We would make sure we would stand ready to provide as much liquidity against collateral as needed as lender of last resort for our banking system”. In other words, if things get bad we'll stop simply twisting and roll out QE3. Whatever it takes.

The declaration was indeed heartening, but then again not all that new. And besides, given QEs 1 and 2 have failed to get markets anywhere other than where we are now, should we be excited? Maybe we were still looking more realistically at some genuine buying. And so it was the Dow was down only 55 points at midday.

Which is where it met the sellers once more, and the battle began anew. Was it hedge funds going short on the assumption Europe must surely implode, or was it simply more capitulation from investors finally giving up? The problem with the last possibility is that given current levels of cash being held by mutual funds and small investors alike, one might argue they all gave up long ago. And that reality was underscored with what happened next.

First came the news of a plan for Dexia Capital – the Franco-Belgian financial institution close to bankruptcy – which would see it park E180bn of toxic sovereign debt positions into a “bad bank”, leaving an unexposed “good bank”. This is exactly the tactic Paulson and Bernanke wanted to employ initially in 2008 for the US banks and their toxic mortgage assets. It didn't happen however, because no one could agree on what over-the-counter CDOs were really worth. Hence was born the alternative TARP plan. In the case of European sovereign debt on the other hand, exchange listings provide price discovery.

Dexia will remain as two banks until the Greek debt restructuring is clearer, but either way the governments of France and Belgium would acquire the “bad bank”. In other words, the plan is a step in the right direction – a direction that should have been taken one, if not two, years ago.

The Dexia news was enough to halt the slide, and the Dow managed to edge a bit higher. Then came the clanger. A report hit the wires from the London Financial Times that the EU finance ministers were examining possible ways to recapitalise European banks. Hellelujah, there it is – the Eurotarp. With such capital support in place, Greece can be guided calmly into an orderly default.

You want to see short covering in action? Just watch the Dow rally 350 points in under 45 minutes.

The stock markets were not the only markets to rock and roll all night. In another sign of capitulation, gold fell sharply to trade below US$1600 as once again positions were cashed in to pay margin calls. Gold subsequently bounced to be down US$40.10 at US$1617.20/oz at the New York close. The Aussie visited the 94s, helped along by yesterday's dovish RBA statement, before rebounding sharply to be up 0.3% in 24 hours at US$0.9557. The US dollar index finished down 0.6% at 79.12. The US ten-year bond yield closed at 1.82% having hit 1.72%.

Oil fell sharply and bounced back, with Brent finishing down US$1.92 to US$99.79/bbl and West Texas down US$1.94 to US$75.67/bbl. London Base metals close at 2pm New York and hence they missed the bounce. Most were around 1% weaker.

The SPI Overnight closed up 43 points or 1.1%.

Are we there yet? No. But we might just be one helluva lot closer. 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

The Overnight Report: Coming To A Head

By Greg Peel

The Dow fell 258 points or 2.4%. The S&P fell 2.9% to close at 1099, breaching the earlier August intraday low of 1101. The Nasdaq dropped 3.3%.

The question is: might this really be good news in disguise?

The Australian market was hit hard yesterday on news Greece had failed to pass the budget deficit reduction test required to be eligible for the next tranche of bail-out funds. The Greek government projected a deficit of 8.5% of GDP for 2011 and 6.8% for 2012, below the limits set of 7.6% and 6.5% respectively. Greece has vowed to implement even further austerity measures but has noted that austerity measures to date are sending Greece into recession.

What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong is the Catch-22 of it all. The more Greece cuts its budget, the greater its economic recession will be. The greater the recession, the less likely the revenue side of the budget will provide enough to gain ground against the expense side. The troika's response? You must cut more. Where does the spiral end? It ends with Greece in default, that's where.

So realistically the troika should give up on its fruitless attempts to prop up Greece. Officials will meet again tonight, but they will not be reaching a decision on whether or not to give Greece its next tranche until October 13. While this seems like yet another delay, it also suggests the troika's intention is to work on shoring up the European banking system first. Greece will simply go down without the bail-out money, implying a “disorderly” default. Better to give Greece the money anyway, buying time to arrange an “orderly” default. That means passing the EFSF through its final parliamentary votes and agreeing on a leverage plan, or Eurotarp.

The first alarm bell, wake-up call, call it what you will has now occurred, with Franco-Belgian financial group Dexia Capital calling an emergency board meeting last night as bankruptcy looms due to Greek debt exposure. The finance ministers of France and Belgium have also called an emergency meeting as a result. Financial markets are in a tail spin. But then perhaps this is exactly what we need. Perhaps a final end to all the dithering and bickering will come through sheer necessity. 

Perhaps we are reaching the critical point.

Yesterday was global manufacturing PMI day, and results were mixed. We already knew China's PMI had risen (officially) to 51.2 in September from 50.9 in August, and we were none too surprised when Australia's PMI fell to 42.3 from 43.3, marking its eleventh fall in thirteen months. Nor could we be knocked down with a feather by the news the eurozone's PMI fell to 48.5 from 49.0.

More promisingly, the UK ticked back up into expansion at 51.1 from 49.4, and the US surprised with an increase to 51.6 from 50.6. They may be barely expansionary numbers, but the US number in particular tells a tale. Take Europe out of the equation and we are not looking at a US double-dip – very slow growth perhaps, but not recession. Sort out the problem once and for all in Europe, and we may not have to be fretting over JP Morgan's collated global manufacturing PMI. It fell to 49.9 in September from 50.6. That's only just a contraction, but it is the first contraction in this global number since June 2009.

I have previously noted that if Europe doesn't sort itself out in a hurry, the markets will do the sorting out instead. What we see now is short-side slamming of weaker stocks around the globe, which in the US case includes the investment banks for example and last night AMR, owner of American Airlines. Bankruptcy rumours have flowed. European bank stocks are simply being carted, suggesting little to no chance of private sector equity injections. The short-side will hammer away until there is nothing left to hammer. 

On the other side of the equation investors continue to take flight into safe havens, and right now the US dollar is the lesser-of-the-evils safe haven of preference. The dollar index rose another 1.0% last night to 79.58 while the benchmark US ten-year bond yield fell 16 basis points to 1.76% as it continues to slide below 2008 levels. Last night was the first session for Operation Twist, and the thirty-year yield fell 19 basis points to 2.73%.

Gold is back in favour, bucking the US dollar influence in rising US$32.50 to US$1657.30/oz as the euro fell 1.2%. Even silver managed to rally 1.5%.

As China enters a three-day holiday, volumes on the LME have dried up. It's also LME Week this week, meaning a lot of talk around the bar and little action in the pits. Metals were all over the shop last night and bounced off intraday lows. Copper still finished down 1.7% from Friday but nickel is up 6%.

West Texas crude continues to be slammed in meaningless fashion since it breached support at US$80 on Friday, falling another US$2.58 or 3% to US$76.62/bbl. The world's benchmark crude's slide is more orderly, and last night Brent recovered to be down US$1.05 to US$101.71/bbl having briefly traded below the US$100 mark.

The Aussie is down 1.3% to US$0.9533 with a lot of the damage being done yesterday as foreigners again exited Aussie stocks.

The SPI Overnight closed down 46 points or 1.2%.

As noted, the S&P 500 closed at 1099, which is below the previous intraday close in August (US credit downgrade day). Technicians will now be slavering over a a more distinct breach suggesting another leg down. The way things are looking, it is hard to see anything but continued selling from here – a la 2008 – until Europe gets its act together. Even then, short-covering would likely give way to another cohort of dispirited investors getting out all together.

And additional noise is not helping. The UK is now considering a referendum on leaving the EU, albeit Prime Minister Cameron has sensibly said it won't be put until after the immediate issues in Europe are sorted. The Republican-led US Senate is putting a bill to impose import tariffs on countries which manipulate their currency, ie China. Talk about pot calling kettle. This blindly and ignorantly parochial bill will nevertheless not be passed in the House.

Yesterday TD Securities informed us that Australia's CPI inflation grew by 2.8% in September. Inflation is still growing but the rate of growth has slowed slightly, given the August number was 2.9%. There is not enough reason here for the RBA to cut today, and no one expects such. There is, however, a growing number of economists joining to school believing a cut is not far off. This view contradicts RBA rhetoric to date, which suggests that “on hold” is in itself a response to Europe and the local two-speed issue because a hike would otherwise be forthcoming. One gets the feeling the RBA is not looking to cut unless it joins in with a G20 coordinated monetary/fiscal emergency response as it did in 2008, in which case global financial markets would have to be facing collapse. But we learn more from Glenn Stevens' statement today.

We'll also see the August trade balance today, which will provide a further clue as to whether demand from China is slowing or not.
 

[Note: All paying members at FNArena are being reminded they can set an email alert specifically for The Overnight Report. Go to Portfolio and Alerts in the Cockpit and tick the box in front of The Overnight Report. You will receive an email alert every time a new Overnight Report has been published on the website.]

article 3 months old

You Can Bank On It

By Greg Peel

Bank analysts figured it out a while back, but unfortunately the market has not, particularly foreign investors in the Australian market. It took the local bank analysts a while, mind you, so we can only hope the market catches on eventually. The funny thing is that if you listen to market commentary, you'd swear the market had caught on. Yet day to day whipsawing of Australian bank stock prices would tend to suggest otherwise.

What am I talking about? I'm talking about the fact Australian banks have reverted to being the “defensive” stocks they have been throughout nearly all of history with the exception of the period 2003-07. That period represented the runaway credit boom which took us to the GFC in 2008, and to the same GFC in a different form in 2011. In that period, Australian banks stopped being defensive and became high-beta, cyclical stocks, with stock prices driven by economic growth which was itself credit-fuelled. Since then, banks have remained cyclical in terms of stock index movements largely because of the F in GFC. What has been the source of all the trouble since 2008? Banks – first US then European. So it stands to reason that Australian banks should also be sold off when things get volatile once more.

But actually it doesn't. The problem with Europe's banks at present is that they are undercapitalised vis a vis the level of toxic sovereign debt risk they are carrying on their balance sheets. If nature had been allowed to take its course, such that Greece would have defaulted long ago and possibly set off a cascade of defaults right through to Italy, then possibly all of Europe's banks would be bankrupt.

In 2008 the story was the same, except in that case it was US banks and toxic mortgage debt. The US banks have since been recapitalised by the public sector, and it would seem the same might be about to happen for the European banks. But what of the Australian banks?

Australia's big banks undertook extensive recapitalisation in 2009-10 via the private sector (albeit with a government deposit guarantee providing a safety net). In retrospect, given the fact Australia did not fall into recession, the extent of recapitalisation was probably over the top, and for the last two years Australian banks have been gradually bringing their unused provisions against potential bad debts back into their earnings pools. However they weren't to know this at the time, and given the collapse of global mortgage security markets they had to quickly find new loan book funding through expensive off-shore loans – the last of which will roll off mid-2012. Australian banks did not have any great exposure to toxic US mortgage debt (NAB had some but nothing too destructive) and they don't have any exposure of note to European sovereign debt.

The only exposure Australian banks have is to a renewed increase in offshore funding cost and a renewed increase in local bad debts due to a recession (and one can argue Australian ex-resources is already in one). Yet herein lie offsets. Credit demand in Australia has plunged but that means less offshore funding is required. Deposit demand has soared which, again, means less need for offshore funding. What this means is that Australia's banks are well capitalised (and exceedingly so compared to US and European banks) and are able to maintain reasonable net interest margins (a bank's source of earnings) through a period of sluggish loan growth. Such margins means Australian bank payout ratios are quite safe, which in turn means dividend yields will remain very attractive until such time as stock prices rally strongly once more.

And this is where the contradiction lies between the “what I say” and “what I do” attitude of foreign investors. Almost every commentator appearing on US business television, and plenty of them on Australian business television, will tell you investing in quality dividend stocks is the way to play this market right now. Australian banks fall into that category, yet every time Europe sneezes again Australian banks are dumped from offshore.

Of course, such episodes do provide opportunities for local investors, if they are prepared to hang on for the wild ride.

The previous FNArena Australian bank report was published on August 23, which was a point at which Europe had reared its ugly head once more after we'd all just got over the US credit rating downgrade and the market had tried to rally again. On August 23, our bank table looked like this:

Between then and now markets have suffered all sorts of extreme volatility, and none more so than in the last week and even as I write. Today's version of the table is as follows, with closing prices reflecting the 3.6%% rally achieved yesterday:

Spot the difference? Well there are certainly differences, but not to any great extent. ANZ Bank ((ANZ)) has suffered one broker downgrade to Hold from Buy which has it slip to third place in the FNArena database consensus table thus shifting Westpac ((WBC)) into second. None of Westpac, National ((NAB)) or Commonwealth ((CBA)) has seen a rating change since August 23.

There has been a little bit of movement in closing prices, but not much. There has been virtually no movement in consensus broker target prices, meaning not a lot of change to that still extraordinary upside to valuation. And those fabulous yields, shown here before applying 100% franking, remain fairly similar.

In other words, despite all the turmoil in the ensuing period which seems to have brought Europe to the brink, Australian bank analysts have just not seen any reason to change their tunes.

Indeed, bank reports in the interim period have remained relatively positive, in least in terms of highlighting defensive qualities and attractive yields in a period of acknowledged slow growth ahead. Goldman Sachs, for example, has suggested bank “dividend yields look sustainable”. Macquarie reiterates that the aforementioned offsets in operation mean income growth for the banks will “hover at or around the average level seen for the last 20 years”.

It isn't all beer and skittles however, with a couple of old habits reappearing to make bank analysts a little nervous.

Having surveyed the banks' senior loan officers, UBS finds that in the current environment of slowing credit demand the response has been to once again ease lending standards. As we all know, it was lax lending which brought us up to the GFC in the first place. Obviously, Aussie banks are not suddenly writing “NINJA” mortgages, but they are easing off on previously tightened mortgage requirements in the face of easing house prices and mortgage demand.

They are also loosening requirements for large corporations, but at this stage they've left requirements for small and medium enterprises (SME) as they have been post-GFC. The agriculture sector, the services sector, and some industrials are enjoying better access to loans, but the offset is a further tightening for anyone in retail and manufacturing – the two “dog” sectors of post-GFC Australia. In other words, banks are cherry-picking via their loan requirements as they let a bit more light in through the shutters. The conclusion drawn is that loan growth will improve over the next 12 months, but net interest margins will ease as a result.

UBS thus believes the Australian banks are “structurally challenged”, and will need to focus on cost cutting and processing upgrades. However at current prices, UBS believes valuations are fair.

In the meantime however, when it comes to mortgages the Big Four banks are “writing almost every new loan,” as research by RBS Australia has found. The Big Four currently hold 62% of the $1 trillion Australian mortgage market, with the balance spread across the smaller banks, foreign banks, credit unions etc and the (minimal) securitisation market. Prior to the GFC, the Big Four controlled 49% of mortgages.

It is perhaps not all that comforting, therefore, at a time when talk of a global recession is once again rife, to learn that Australian mortgage standards are being eased again in the face of falling demand. Nor is it all that comforting to find that the Big Four are once again discounting mortgages prices, as JP Morgan notes.

[As an aside – two of the great misconceptions in Australia are that mortgage rates bear any relationship to the RBA cash rate, and Australian banks are some sort of non-competitive cartel.]

NAB started it all off with its “breaking up” campaign, which proved not only cleverly irreverent and a real slag off at stupid politicians but also a great success. NAB has picked up quite a slice of the mortgage market as a result, ANZ's gains have been modest, while the offset is Westpac's losses have been modest and CBA has been the big loser. Given the extent of Big Four dominance in the mortgage market, and given the Big Four are writing almost every new loan, as RBS notes, it's all as good as a zero sum game.

Yet within the zero sum game, as JP Morgan has found, competition has led to mortgage discounting – again. But rather than competition being based in the standard variable rate (SVR) market as it usually has been, competition has hotted up in the fixed rate market. Fixed rates are now being offered below SVRs. How can that be?

Well, it's all about the first point I made above, being that multiple-year mortgage rates have nothing to do with the RBA overnight cash rate, as well they shouldn't given the duration gap. The average duration of loans on a bank's books sit around the 4-5 year mark, and the Australian yield curve has “slumped” of late given high demand for term deposits and expectations of an RBA rate cut. This allows the banks to lock in cheaper funding and thus offer cheaper fixed rate loans without the usual level of risk associated with not being able to move rates up and down with the RBA.

It's all good news for the home buyer, but for the bank stock investor it means greater pressure on those important net interest rate margins, which are what translate into earnings and dividends. JP Morgan thus concludes that earnings risk is now to the downside for banks, meaning the “slow” rate of earnings growth for Australian banks previously assumed will be even slower.

On that basis, we can conclude that while Australian banks have become “defensive” once more, despite still being the plaything of fickle foreign investors, they are not quite as defensive as, say, a utility or a telco, or even a supermarket. But then that is why Australian bank yields are currently at such historically high levels (even before we talk 100% franking). Nobody said there was no risk at all.
 

Technical limitations

If you are reading this story through a third party distribution channel and you cannot see charts included, we apologise, but technical limitations are to blame.

Find out why FNArena subscribers like the service so much: "Your Feedback (Thank You)" - Warning this story contains unashamedly positive feedback on the service provided.