Commodities | Sep 29 2011
By Justin Dove, Investment U Research
Nuclear power took a huge public relations hit in the wake of the Fukushima disaster. A supposed “clean” energy, it caused massive devastation and left miles of land uninhabitable for thousands of years. At least 25 reactors in Europe were shut down or cancelled since the triple meltdown in March.
But what if nuclear power could produce more power with less material, while being incredibly less risky?
There’s a growing sentiment that it may be possible with a little-known radioactive metal called thorium. An article in the latest issue of Los Alamos Laboratories’ National Security Science opened with this introduction:
“Imagine an element that when used in a nuclear reactor is so safe that it may never lead to the possibility of the type of catastrophic meltdown that threatened the reactors in Japan. Picture one ton of such an element producing as much energy as 200 tons of uranium or 3,500,000 tons of competitiveness.”
Changing The Way Our Economy Views Thorium
Currently thorium has no real uses in today’s economy. It’s actually viewed as waste, a radioactive byproduct of rare earth mining.
The U.S. government even has 3,200 metric tons of thorium trapped in nuclear waste from the 1960s. Since disposal would cost $60 million, the waste is buried in a shallow grave in Nevada.
It’s estimated that there are only about 80 years left of sustainable uranium production.
Thorium would be inexpensive to mine, since it’s plentiful and little is needed.
Because of this, the mining and production of thorium would probably never be as profitable as it is for uranium. Thorium will most likely be produced and cheaply sold as a byproduct by rare earth miners, such as Molycorp (NYSE: MCP).
Lynas Corp. (OTC: LYSCF.PK) is actually planning to get rid of the thorium it will encounter at Mount Weld. The expensive plans involve diluting the radioactive metal with lime, encasing it in concrete and using it for artificial reef systems.
But if China, India, France, Norway, or even the United States’ plans for thorium nuclear reactors take hold, costs could be reduced greatly for Lynas. Instead of the expensive disposal of thorium, it could be sold for use in reactors. Thorium probably wouldn’t be very profitable, but the lack of expense would certainly help the company’s bottom line.
The Companies Leading the Way in Thorium Technology
Rather than investing in the miners or directly in thorium, the biggest beneficiaries will be entrepreneurial companies that lead the way in producing the reactors.
So far, the only publicly traded pure play on thorium nuclear power is Lightbridge Corp. (Nasdaq: LTBR). Dr. Alvin Radkowsky, who was a chief scientist at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (later named the Department of Energy), founded the company in 1992. Originally called Thorium Power, Ltd., the name was changed to Lightbridge in 2009.
However, with a market cap of $34 million and no profitability, Lightbridge is a wildly speculative company.
Another company to watch is Flibe Energy. It’s a private start-up created in May by Kirk Sorensen, a former NASA engineer who dedicated his life to promoting Weinberg’s work with thorium molten reactors. There’s no telling if the company will ever become public or profitable, but this guy seems to be the current authority on thorium nuclear power.
Also, pay attention to the effect this could have on energy companies that currently use coal plants or uranium-based reactors. Uranium miners and producers will also likely take a hit if this technology comes to fruition.
Good investing,
Justin Dove
Reprinted with permission of the publisher. The above story can be read on the website www.investmentU.com. The direct link is: http://www.investmentu.com/2011/September/thorium-the-future-of-nuclear-power.html
Nothing published by Investment U should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Investment U should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.
Views expressed are not FNArena's (see our disclaimer).
